Hybrid electric vehicle fuel minimization by DC-DC converter dual-phase-shift control

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2017.04.007Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Powertrain voltage control for hybrid electric vehicle fuel minimization proposed.

  • Dual active bridge DC-DC converter dual phase shift control varies DC-link voltage.

  • Dual phase shift offers two control variables to regulate power and minimize loss.

  • Fuel economy improves over single phase shift and PI control for large drive range.

  • DC-link voltage control must not couple strongly with powertrain energy management.

Abstract

The paper introduces an advanced DC-link variable voltage control methodology that improves significantly the fuel economy of series Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEVs). The DC-link connects a rectifier, a Dual Active Bridge (DAB) DC-DC converter and an inverter, interfacing respectively the two sources and the load in a series HEV powertrain. The introduced Dual Phase Shift (DPS) proportional voltage conversion ratio control scheme is realized by manipulating the phase shifts of the gating signals in the DAB converter, to regulate the amount of DAB converter power flow in and out of the DC-link. Dynamic converter efficiency models are utilized to account for switching, conduction, copper and core losses. The control methodology is proposed on the basis of improving the individual efficiency of the DAB converter but with its parameters tuned to minimize the powertrain fuel consumption. Since DPS control has one additional degree of freedom as compared to Single Phase Shift (SPS) voltage control schemes, a Lagrange Multiplier optimization method is applied to minimize the leakage inductance peak current, the main cause for switching and conduction losses. The DPS control scheme is tested in simulations with a full HEV model and two associated conventional supervisory control algorithms, together with a tuned SPS proportional voltage conversion ratio control scheme, against a conventional PI control in which the DC-link voltage follows a constant reference. Nonlinear coupling difficulties associated with the integration of varying DC-link voltage in the powertrain are also exposed and addressed.

Introduction

Transport is a significant contributor of carbon emissions, only coming second to Energy (Committee on Climate Change, 2015). The vast majority of these emissions come from road transport and are currently on the rise (Edenhofer, 2014). The hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) has been identified as critical for achieving sustainable transportation, by decreasing consumption of fossil fuels (Bose, 2013). According to Khaligh, Rahimi, and Emadi (2008) there is a strong potential to enhance the sustainable impact of HEVs by improving their efficiency, with significant advances already achieved in the last decade by smart supervisory control systems that manage the powertrain energy flow (Wirasingha & Emadi, 2011). The present paper represents an attempt to contribute to this goal by proposing DC-link voltage controls to operate series HEV powertrains more efficiently and improve their fuel economy.

Various HEV topologies exist. A DC-DC converter is included in architectures in which the DC-link and electric energy store (generally a chemical battery) operate at different voltages, to act as the interface between them. Many types of DC-DC converters have already been employed in this context, ranging from standard boost (Estima & Cardoso, 2012), three-level (Dusmez, Hasanzadeh & Khaligh, 2014), isolated dual half- and full-bridge (DAB) (Krismer and Kolar, 2012, Inoue and Akagi, 2007, Li et al.,, Rathore and Prasanna, 2013, Al-Sheikh et al., 2014) and other converters (Amjadi & Williamson, 2010). The DAB converter, included in the present research, has become popular due to its advantages in power controllability, bi-directionality, soft-switching ability and high efficiency (Zhao, Song, Liu, & Sun, 2014). Operation under soft-switching has particularly received wide attention in an attempt to achieve energy loss minimization (Chen et al., 2010, Ma et al., 2009). The loss reduction is achieved by zero-voltage-switching (ZVS) or zero-current-switching (ZCS) in all the converter switches, but this comes at the expense of additional components and more complex control. Furthermore, the reduction is obtained mainly in the switching losses which is only one of the loss mechanisms in the converter.

The simplicity and ease of implementation of the single phase-shift (SPS) control has established it as the classical control methodology of DAB converters. In this scheme, the average power flow through the converter can be regulated directly by the phase shift input. However, operation under SPS control is marred by circulating currents and reactive power, which increase the energy losses (Bai & Mi, 2008). Various other control algorithms, involving different phase-shift and modulation strategies, have been proposed in the literature with the aim of increasing the DAB converter efficiency (Oggier et al., 2011, Krismer et al., 2006, Zhou and Khambadkone, 2009). These schemes, however, have disadvantages related to implementation complexity, limited power range and limited operating range. Dual phase-shift (DPS) control, which manipulates two phase-shifts as control inputs, has emerged as a suitable algorithm to eliminate reactive power and increase efficiency (Bai and Mi, 2008, Zhao et al., 2013, Wen and Su, 2015).

Beyond the provision of the interface, the deployment of a DC-DC converter in a series HEV powertrain facilitates the controlled variation of the DC-link voltage by manipulating the converter electronic switches via their gating signals. Studies on DC-link control already exist, with a precursor of such work found in Estima and Cardoso (2012). This work compares two single source electric drive systems in which a battery either supplies an inverter directly or does so via a bidirectional boost converter, to power a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PMSM). The presence of the boost converter enables control of the DC-link voltage, and it is shown that when the voltage is changed in proportion with the PMSM speed, overall efficiency improvements result.

In Song and Wang (2014) a more complex dual source topology is considered corresponding to series HEV powertrains. It comprises a DC-link with a three-phase rectifier interfaced engine-generator set, a bidirectional DC-DC converter interfaced battery, and a three-phase inverter interfaced motor. The work proposes improved operation reliability by implementing DC-link voltage control which maintains a constant inverter modulation index. The principle followed is that reliability deteriorates with increasing converter energy losses, hence the underlining objective of the DC-link control is to reduce these losses. However, while the constant modulation index objective is beneficial to the inverter losses, it is not necessarily the optimal rule for DC-DC converter loss reduction. Furthermore, Song and Wang (2014) does not account for the rectifier losses and the effect of the voltage control on these losses.

A similar series HEV powertrain, with a DAB DC-DC converter, is treated in Roche, Shabbir and Evangelou (2016) with the objective to reduce the losses in all the electronic converters. This work develops a process to choose the most appropriate nominal DC-link voltage for maximized inverter and rectifier efficiencies. It also designs a DC-link voltage control that pushes the DAB converter in boost/buck operation when the battery charges/discharges, such that it avoids hard switching losses persistently in its whole operating range. Thus it achieves substantially higher converter efficiency than conventional constant voltage control schemes. Nevertheless, this study does not consider the impact of the varying DC-link voltage on the overall efficiency of the powertrain and hence on the fuel economy.

The present research develops a novel, efficient and powerful DC-link voltage control algorithm for a series HEV that optimizes the overall system efficiency, by dual-phase-shift control of the DAB DC-DC converter. In order to provide the appropriate context for comparison the research also contributes a single-phase-shift algorithm for DC-link control, based on the approach in Roche et al. (2016), which has further been adapted and optimized for overall system efficiency. System efficiency is quantified by utilizing the concept of equivalent fuel consumption which accounts for both the real fuel and battery charge consumption. Both control schemes developed are compared with a conventional PI constant DC-link voltage control scheme in extensive simulations with a comprehensive HEV mathematical model. The investigation in this paper represents an application of DPS control in a significantly more complex setting than in existing literature, which essentially considered DPS control of a DAB DC-DC converter utilized at simple boundary conditions of constant input voltage and constant power out to a resistive load (Kim et al., 2011, Wang et al., 2013, Wen and Su, 2015, Zhao et al., 2013).

The paper structure is as follows. Section 2 describes: (a) the basis HEV model that is used to conduct the research, (b) the supervisory control strategies employed to simulate the HEV model, (c) the modeling of the inverter and rectifier power loss respectively for varying PMSM and Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator (PMSG) operating conditions, and (d) the operating mode dependent DAB converter switching, conduction, copper and core loss modeling. Section 3 describes the DC-link control schemes developed and tested in this work: the constant voltage PI control, and the SPS and DPS proportional voltage conversion ratio control schemes. Simulation results are presented in Section 4, including a description of the tuning of the voltage controls, and a comparison of their characteristics and performance in terms of power profile, evolution of DC-link voltage and modulation indexes, converter losses and fuel economy. Conclusions are drawn in Section 5.

Section snippets

Modeling

The HEV model utilized in this paper is high-fidelity. It corresponds to a general-purpose passenger car and is based on that presented in Roche et al. (2016) and Shabbir (2016), with earlier versions of the model found in Evangelou and Shabbir (2016) and Evangelou and Shukla (2012). As in the basis model, the present model characterizes the dynamic efficiency for both the inverter and rectifier by including modulation-index dependent conduction and switching losses. The DAB converter design

Control of DC-link voltage

The paper investigates and compares three control schemes which are detailed in this Section: a) the constant voltage PI control, b) the single phase-shift proportional ratio control, and c) the dual phase-shift proportional ratio control.

Simulation results

The performance and operation of the three voltage control strategies presented are assessed and compared in this Section. This is done by simulation of the vehicle model described, with the Thermostat and Power Follower SCSs.

Conclusion

The fuel economy of series HEVs is shown to improve by dynamic variation of the voltage of the DC-link that joins the powertrain converters. The variation is achieved by controlling the power flow of the DAB DC-DC converter that integrates the energy storage device with the DC-link. DC-DC converter single-phase-shift proportional voltage conversion ratio and dual-phase-shift control methodologies significantly outperform constant voltage control, in terms of DC-DC converter efficiency but also

References (43)

  • W. Shabbir et al.

    Real-time control strategy to maximize hybrid electric vehicle powertrain efficiency

    Applied Energy

    (2014)
  • Al-Sheikh, H., Bennouna, O., Hoblos, G., & Moubayed, N. (2014). Modeling, design and fault analysis of bidirectional...
  • Z. Amjadi et al.

    Power-electronics-based solutions for plug-in hybrid electric vehicle energy storage and management systems

    IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics

    (2010)
  • H. Bai et al.

    Eliminate reactive power and increase system efficiency of isolated bidirectional dual-active-bridge DC-DC converters using novel dual-phase-shift control

    IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics

    (2008)
  • Bierhoff, M. H., & Fuchs, F. W. (2004). Semiconductor losses in voltage source and current source IGBT converters based...
  • B.K. Bose

    Global energy scenario and impact of power electronics in 21st century

    IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics

    (2013)
  • W. Chen et al.

    Snubberless bidirectional DC-DC converter with new CLLC resonant tank featuring minimized switching loss

    IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics

    (2010)
  • Committee on Climate Change (2015). Reducing emissions and preparing for climate change – 2015 Progress Report to...
  • Dusmez, S., Hasanzadeh, A., & Khaligh, A. (2014). Loss analysis of non-isolated bidirectional dc/dc converters for...
  • Edenhofer O., et al., (2014). Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. 914 Sci. rep.,...
  • M. Ehsani et al.

    Modern electric, hybrid electric, and fuel cell vehicles: Fundamentals, theory, and design

    (2010)
  • J.O. Estima et al.

    Efficiency analysis of drive train topologies applied to electric/hybrid vehicles

    IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology

    (2012)
  • Evangelou, S. A., & Shabbir, W. (2016). Dynamic modeling platform for series hybrid electric vehicles. In Proceedings...
  • Evangelou, S. A., Rehman-Shaikh, M.A. Power loss characterization of bidirectional DC-DC converter with...
  • Evangelou, SA., & Shukla, A. (2012). Advances in the modelling and control of series hybrid electric vehicles. In...
  • Graovac, D., & Purschel, M. (2009). IGBT power losses calculations using data-sheet parameters. Tech. rep. Infineon...
  • S. Inoue et al.

    A bidirectional DC-DC converter for an energy storage system with galvanic isolation

    IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics

    (2007)
  • A. Khaligh et al.

    Modified pulse-adjustment technique to control dc/dc converters driving variable constant-power loads

    IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics

    (2008)
  • M. Kheraluwala et al.

    Performance characterization of a high power dual active bridge DC-DC converter

    IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications

    (1992)
  • Kim, M., Rosekeit, M., Sul, S. K., & De Doncker RWAA. (2011). A dual-phase-shift control strategy for...
  • Y. Ko et al.

    A supervisory control algorithm for a series hybrid vehicle with multiple energy sources

    IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology

    (2015)
  • Cited by (11)

    • Comprehensive energy efficiency analysis of series hybrid electric vehicles with dual-phase-shift-controlled DC-DC converter

      2020, Journal of the Franklin Institute
      Citation Excerpt :

      A complete characterization of the DAB converter efficiency for all the operating modes of the converter and representation of the DC-DC DAB converter as a two-port network component model which can be conveniently integrated in a vehicle system model (Section 2). Analysis and comparison of the losses and energy efficiency of series HEVs that include a conventional DAB converter that is controlled according to various methodologies, including a recently developed optimal DPS variable DC-link voltage control scheme [28], while undergoing realistic driving conditions and employing two different conventional powertrain energy management control methodologies, the Thermostat and Power Follower control strategies (Section 3). An important aspect in the analysis is the consideration of both the developed DAB converter power loss model and a conventional constant efficiency DC-DC converter model [29,30] to evaluate the impact that the converter modeling fidelity has on converter loss prediction accuracy and on fuel consumption prediction in series HEV applications.

    • Nonlinear control of direct-drive pump-controlled clutch actuator in consideration of pump efficiency map

      2019, Control Engineering Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      A clutch is required at start-up or during gear shifting to disconnect the combustion engine from the gear box (Lu, Chen, Wang, & Gao, 2011; Nouailletas, Mendes, & Koenig, 2010). The automatic control of the clutch engagement plays a crucial role in Automated Manual Transmission (AMT) (Berkel, Hofman, Serrarens, & Steinbuch, 2014), which is widely used in pure electric vehicles and hybrid electric vehicles to implement the mode switching and gear shifting (Chen, Xi, & Sun, 2012; Evangelou & Rehman-Shaikh, 2017; Lhomme et al., 2008; Wang, Li, & Yang, 2016). Therefore, the precise position control of the clutch is essential for safety, comfort and fuel economy (Pisaturo, Cirrincione, & Senatore, 2015).

    • Optimal model predictive fuzzy control of DC–DC convertor

      2024, Advanced Control for Applications: Engineering and Industrial Systems
    • Charging stations and standards

      2021, Cable Based and Wireless Charging Systems for Electric Vehicles: Technology and control, management and grid integration
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text