Elsevier

Computers & Structures

Volume 118, March 2013, Pages 109-114
Computers & Structures

A Galerkin least-square stabilisation technique for hyperelastic biphasic soft tissue

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.10.010Get rights and content

Abstract

An hyperelastic biphasic model is presented. For slow-draining problems (permeability less than 1 × 10−2 mm4 N−1 s−1), numerical instabilities in the form of non-physical oscillations in the pressure field are observed in 3D problems using tetrahedral Taylor–Hood finite elements. As an alternative to considerable mesh refinement, a Galerkin least-square stabilisation framework is proposed. This technique drastically reduces the pressure discrepancies and prevents these oscillations from propagating towards the centre of the medium. The performance and robustness of this technique are demonstrated on a 3D numerical example.

Introduction

The theory of porous media (TPM) is a powerful and yet simple tool to model multi-phase media, primarily comprising a solid and a fluid (which are referred to as “constituents”). Due to its modularity, this theory also represents a practical framework to include other effects such as mass exchange, chemical reactions and electrochemical phenomena. There is no restriction as to which material models can be used, e.g. anisotropy or viscosity and is therefore well suited for the analysis of hydrogels, polymeric foams and hydrated biological soft tissues (e.g. cartilage and intervertebral disc).

The concepts behind the TPM find their roots in diffusion and soil mechanics problems formulated in the nineteenth century (for historical developments, see [3], [9]). The TPM is a homogenised macroscopic representation of the porous media. It is a continuum-based model which fully couples the fluid and the solid (see Fig. 1). It overcomes the difficulty of obtaining an accurate geometrical description of the microstructure by using the concept of volume fractions to “smear” the constituent properties over a control space to obtain properties of the overall mixture. This is described in the following section.

The authors have employed TPM in the development of an hyperelastic biphasic swelling model for modelling the intervertebral disc. This application illustrates slow-draining problems, where a porous medium with low permeability (in the range 1 × 10−2  1 × 10−3 mm4 N−1 s−1) is rapidly loaded. Such low permeabilities are typical for soft tissues (e.g. cartilage, brain tissue), mortar or homogeneous clays [2], [13], [17].

This model has been implemented in a finite element framework, employing Taylor–Hood (quadratic shape functions for the solid displacement, linear shape functions for the pressure) tetrahedral elements, aiming to fulfil the infsup condition (see [6], [5]). However, numerical instabilities manifest in the form of non-physical oscillations in the pressure field, which is a shortcoming already observed in the past (see for example [16] for a recent review of biological applications). Vermeer and Verruijt [21] explain that these instabilities occur because loads applied to free-flow boundary conditions may lead to singularities in the derivatives of the pressure field. They also derive a lower bound critical time-step for one-dimensional problems, suggesting the requirement for large time-steps to overcome this issue, often incompatible with fast loading rates.

Several stabilisation techniques have been proposed in the context of Biot’s consolidation problems for small deformations (e.g. [12] using least-squares mixed finite element methods, and [1] by perturbation of the flow equation). The current work proposes to stabilise the pressure oscillations in the context of TPM for finite deformation problems, using a Galerkin Least-Square (GLS) formulation based on [19]. In order to focus only on the stabilisation aspect, only a biphasic mixture is considered, that is a porous medium composed of two constituents α: an isotropic, non viscous hyperelastic solid (α = S) and an ideal fluid (α = F).

Section snippets

The biphasic model

The biphasic model presented in this section is based on [8], [10]. A few preliminary assumptions are made to keep the derivation as simple as possible in order to focus on the stabilisation aspect. First, the quasi-static problem of small biological tissues is herein considered, thus neglecting external body forces. Second, the constituents are assumed immiscible and no density supply is allowed. Third, it is assumed that the whole space is occupied by either of the constituents. Finally,

The GLS stabilisation

The spurious oscillations are stabilised using a Galerkin Least-Square (GLS) formulation, following [19] that has been extended for finite deformations. This formulation was originally derived to solve geotechnical problems of fully and partially saturated soils. A weighted least-square term RGLS, originating from the strong form of the fluid flow continuity equation (Eq. (2.9)) is derived and added onto the weak form (Eq. (2.17c)):R=Ru-ΔtRp+RGLS=0Starting off by defining the least-square term R

Numerical example

The performance of the GLS stabilisation technique is assessed on a biphasic cylinder subjected to unconfined compression. With a 18 mm radius, a thickness of 8 mm and a solid phase defined with λ = 0.2 MPa and μ = 0.5 MPa, the cylinder can be thought of as an idealised human nucleus pulposus of the intervertebral disc when the permeability is set to k = 1 × 10−3 mm4 N−1 s−1. The permeability is assumed to be constant.

The fluid flux q¯ at the boundary is prescribed to zero on the vertical faces offering a

Conclusion

It was observed that an hyperelastic biphasic model, implemented in a finite element framework with Taylor–Hood tetrahedral elements, exhibits non-physical pressure oscillations for low permeabilities. A Galerkin least-square formulation was derived for finite deformations in order to stabilise these oscillations.

In the context of constant permeability and near to uni-axial fluid flow, the current formulation shows good results. It eliminates the spurious oscillations for most meshes (and damp

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Glasgow Research Partnership in Engineering (GRPE).

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text