ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Computers & Structures
Volume 83, Issues 4-5, January 2005, Pages 339-356
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (902 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.08.014    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2004 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

A full coupled numerical analysis approach for buried structures subjected to subsurface blast

Zhongqi Wanga, Yong Lua, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Hong Haob and Karen Chongc

aSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798, Singapore bDepartment of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia cDefense Science and Technology Agency, Ministry of Defense, 1 Depot Road, Singapore 109679, Singapore

Received 5 September 2003; 
accepted 31 August 2004. 
Available online 26 November 2004.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

The physical processes during an explosion in soil and the subsequent response of buried structures are extremely complex. Combining all these processes into a single analysis model involves several numerical difficulties but such a model will enable more realistic reproduction of the underlying physical processes. This paper presents a full coupled numerical analysis approach, in which the SPH (smooth particle hydrodynamics) method is adopted to model the near field medium to cater for large deformation, while the conventional FEM is used to model the intermediate and the far field soil medium and the structural response. A robust three-phase soil model developed by the authors is employed to model the soil mass. The numerical model is verified against empirical predictions and the comparison shows a favorable agreement.

Keywords: Buried structure; Subsurface blast; SPH–FEM coupled method; Stress wave; Structural response; In-structure shock

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Basic considerations on SPH–FEM coupled analysis
3. Computational framework
3.1. Conservation equations
3.2. The smooth particle hydrodynamic (SPH) method
3.3. The coupled SPH and FEM method
4. Material models
4.1. Three-phase soil model
4.2. The equation of state (EOS)
4.3. Damage for soil
4.4. The strength model for soils
4.5. Concrete model
4.6. The failure surface
4.7. The elastic limit surface and strain hardening
4.8. Residual failure surface
4.9. Damage for concrete
4.10. Pα equation of state
4.11. Elastic–strain hardening plastic model for steel
4.12. JWL equation of state for explosive
4.13. The interface model
4.14. The computational cycle
5. Numerical example
5.1. Buried structure configuration and numerical model setup
5.2. The crater formation
5.3. The propagation of blast wave in soil
5.4. Response of the structure
5.5. In-structure shock
5.6. Conclusions
References

















Computers & Structures
Volume 83, Issues 4-5, January 2005, Pages 339-356
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.