Elsevier

Composites Part B: Engineering

Volume 39, Issues 7–8, October–December 2008, Pages 1183-1195
Composites Part B: Engineering

Design and manufacture of all-PP sandwich panels based on co-extruded polypropylene tapes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.03.010Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper describes the creation of polypropylene sandwich panels, based on all-polypropylene (all-PP) composite laminates combined with a polypropylene based honeycomb or foam core. These all-PP composite laminates are based on high modulus polypropylene tape reinforcing a polypropylene matrix. Sandwich panels containing these all-PP composite laminate faces are compared with sandwich panels containing conventional glass fibre reinforced polypropylene laminate faces, and the mechanical properties, failure modes, and design requirements of these different materials are discussed.

Introduction

Sandwich panels are relatively common composite structural products and are employed in areas such as sports equipment, and in automotive and aeronautical applications. A typical sandwich panel is composed of three layers, in which two thin sheets (faces) of a stiff and strong material are separated by a thick core of low-density material [1]. Composite laminates are often employed as the faces of a sandwich panel due to their high mechanical performance and low density. Sandwich structures have optimised specific flexural stiffness (flexural rigidity) because the separation of the two faces by a low density core increases the moment of inertia and hence contributes to the flexural stiffness of the panel, with only a small increase in panel mass. In addition to the high stiffness and low density of sandwich panels, an extra advantage of sandwich panels is that the designer can tailor the properties of the sandwich by adjusting the geometrical parameters of the panels (thickness of the core and the faces) independently of the material used.

The different material characteristics required of the core and faces of a sandwich panel often demands the use of different materials. This complicates recycling, since recycling can necessitate costly material separation at the end of life of the product, if the constituent materials of the product have different recycling processes. Therefore, the concept of creating a sandwich panel in which the faces and the core are made from the same material is attractive since it would remove this separation step in the recycling process. However, the desire to make a sandwich panel composed only of one material must be balanced with the need for adequate mechanical properties from the final sandwich panel.

A candidate material for the construction of sandwich panels is polypropylene (PP). PP is commonly used for a range of applications due its low cost, environmental stability, ease of processing and because it is relatively easy to recycle [2], [3], [4]. However, due its modest mechanical properties, PP often needs to be reinforced to satisfy load-bearing applications. Glass fibres are popular reinforcing elements for PP due to their relatively low cost and high mechanical performance. Alternative composite systems reinforced with natural fibres such as flax, hemp and sisal have also been reported [5], [6] and may appear to be more environmentally friendly [7]. However, although these natural fibres are renewable and can be incinerated, degradation and heterogeneity of fibres can cause performance issues. Clearly, the introduction of any foreign filler whether a glass or a natural fibre, complicates recycling [8]. However, composite materials based entirely on polypropylene have been developed and reported in literature [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. These “all-PP” composites show potential for use as faces of sandwich panels. all-PP composites consist purely of a propylene copolymer matrix reinforced with a very high volume fraction of high-performance PP tapes. Since these composites do not contain any foreign reinforcements, recycling can be achieved by simple thermal processing at the end of life of the structure [14], and recycled in a subsequent generation of all-PP composites or simply used as a feedstock for less demanding applications. Because these all-PP composites are entirely thermoplastic, the performance of these composites can be expected to vary at different strain rates and temperatures, and this is the focus of a separate publication [12].

This paper describes the development of recyclable sandwich panels based on all-PP composite faces and PP based cores. Flexural testing is used to compare all-PP faced sandwich panels with sandwich panels having glass reinforced PP faces. The bond strength between the face plates and the sandwich core is also assessed. Sandwich panels constructed using the same PP based cores but commercial glass reinforced polypropylene face panels will be presented for comparison. Finally the minimum weight criterion of a sandwich panel with respect to a given flexural stiffness developed by Kuenzi [15] was found appropriate to compare the performance of the different face materials.

Section snippets

Designing with all-PP laminates

The mechanical properties of all-PP laminates are presented in Table 1, compared to glass fibre reinforced polypropylene (GFRPP). The mechanical properties of GFRPP depend strongly on the architecture of the reinforcement and the volume of glass fibres present. Woven glass fibre reinforced PP (woven glass/PP), such as Twintex®, with a glass content of 60 wt% (percentage by weight) woven fabrics of continuous fibre, has considerably higher mechanical properties than glass mat thermoplastics (GMT)

all-PP sandwich face panels

It has been widely reported in literature that it is possible to create highly oriented PP fibres or tapes, with high tensile strength and stiffness, by molecular orientation achieved during solid state drawing [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], and thus it is conceivable to use such tapes as a reinforcement for a composite material. Much has been published on alternative processing routes to achieve single polymer composites such as combining high performance

Specimen production

Sandwich panels were produced consisting of all-PP, GMT or woven glass/PP face panels, and a core composed of either a PP honeycomb or a PP foam. The stacking sequence used to create the sandwich panels was: face panel-adhesive film-core-adhesive film-face panel, as illustrated in Fig. 6. The stacked collection of layers is then subjected to heat and pressure to bond the sandwich faces to the core material, by melting the adhesive film. The method used to apply this heat and pressure depends on

Differential scanning calorimetry

To determine the melting behaviours of both of the copolymer adhesive films investigated in this paper, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was performed on 5 mg samples of polymer taken from the pellet form, using a TA Instruments DSC Q1000 differential scanning calorimeter. To remove the effect of thermal history of the DSC results, samples were heated in the DSC from ambient temperature to 180 °C at 10 °C min−1 and then cooled to 20 °C, also at 10 °C min−1. Immediately, the samples were

Differential scanning calorimetry

Fig. 11 shows the DSC data obtained for copolymer LS and HS melt adhesives. Also indicated on Fig. 11 are the manufacturers recommended sealing temperatures. It is clear that copolymer LS melt adhesive has a lower temperature endothermic event associated with the manufacturers melt sealing temperature, which is absent from copolymer HS melt adhesive. The lower melting temperature of copolymer LS melt adhesive allows adhesion of the sandwich faces to the sandwich cores at lower temperatures,

Conclusions

The use of material selection tools to assess the performance of all-PP composites in structural sandwich applications reveals that there is a potential to reduce the weight of applications where GFRPP is currently used. This is particularly true in the case of stiffness limited design. It was, however, stressed that the low compressive strength of all-PP can be a limiting factor for the use of all-PP structures loaded in flexure or compression.

It has been shown that 100% PP sandwich panels can

Acknowledgement

This work was sponsored by the Dutch Government’s Economy, Ecology and Technology (EET) programme for sustainable development, under Grant No. EETK97104.

References (71)

  • P.J. Hine et al.

    The hot compaction behaviour of woven oriented polypropylene fibres and tapes I

    Mech Prop Polym

    (2003)
  • N.D. Jordan et al.

    The hot compaction behaviour of woven oriented polypropylene fibres and tapes. II. Morphology of cloths before and after compaction

    Polymer

    (2003)
  • T. Peijs

    Composites for recyclability

    Mater Today

    (2003)
  • B. Alcock et al.

    The effect of temperature and strain rate on the impact performance of recyclable all-polypropylene composites

    Compos Part B: Eng

    (2008)
  • F. Meraghni et al.

    Mechanical behaviour of cellular core for structural sandwich panels

    Composites: Part A

    (1999)
  • J.C. Theulen et al.

    Optimization of the bending stiffness and strength of composite sandwich panels

    Compos Struct

    (1991)
  • H.G. Allen

    Analysis and design of structural sandwich panels

    (1969)
  • B.E. Tiganis et al.

    Effects of processing on the microstructure melting behaviour and melting temperature of polypropylene

    J Appl Polym Sci

    (1996)
  • J. Brydson

    Plastics materials

    (1999)
  • A.K. Bledzki et al.

    Natural fibre reinforced plastics

  • S.K. Garkhail et al.

    Mechanical properties of natural-fibre-mat-reinforced thermoplastics based on flax fibres and polypropylene

    Appl Compos Mater

    (2000)
  • R. Heijenrath et al.

    Natural-fibre-mat-reinforced thermoplastic composite based on flax fibres and polypropylene

    Adv Compos Lett

    (1996)
  • Y. Leterrier

    Life cycle engineering of composites in comprehensive composite materials

    (2000)
  • B. Alcock et al.

    Interfacial properties of highly oriented coextruded polypropylene tapes for the creation of recyclable all-polypropylene composites

    J Appl Polym Sci

    (2007)
  • Alcock B. Single polymer composites based on polypropylene: processing and properties. UK: Queen Mary, University of...
  • Kuenzi EW. Minimum weight structural sandwich. US Forest Service Research Note, FPL-086; 1965. p....
  • L.A. Berglund et al.

    Glass mat reinforced polypropylene

    (1995)
  • Peijs T, Jacobs MJN, Lemstra PJ. High performance polyethylene fibers. In: Kelly A, Zweben C, editors. Comprehensive...
  • M.F. Ashby

    Materials selection in mechanical design

    (1999)
  • The Cambridge Engineering Selector, in www.grantadesign.com, G. Design;...
  • W.H. Carothers et al.

    Studies of polymerization and ring formation. XV. Artificial fibres from synthetic linear condensation superpolymers

    J Am Chem Soc

    (1932)
  • M. Takayanagi et al.

    Mechanical properties of fine structures and drawn polymers

    J Polym Sci: Part C

    (1966)
  • S.M. Aharoni et al.

    Crystalline transitions and the solid state extrusion of polymers

    J Appl Polym Sci

    (1979)
  • S.M. Aharoni et al.

    On the conformational behavior and solid-state extrudability of crystalline polymers

    Polym Eng Sci

    (1979)
  • A.J. Wills et al.

    Plastic deformation of polypropylene: effect of molecular weight on drawing behavior and structural characteristics of ultra-high modulus products

    J Polym Sci: Polym Phys Ed

    (1980)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text