ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Computers & Education
Volume 48, Issue 1, January 2007, Pages 137-152
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (630 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.02.004    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Pedagogical approaches for technology-integrated science teachingstar, open

Sara Hennessya, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Jocelyn Wishartb, Denise Whitelockc, Rosemary Deaneya, Richard Brawnb, Linda la Velleb, Angela McFarlaneb, Kenneth Ruthvena and Mark Winterbottoma

aFaculty of Education, University of Cambridge, 184 Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2PQ, UK bGraduate School of Education, University of Bristol, 35 Berkeley Square, Bristol BS8 1JA, UK cInstitute of Educational Technology, Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK

Available online 17 April 2006.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

The two separate projects described have examined how teachers exploit computer-based technologies in supporting learning of science at secondary level. This paper examines how pedagogical approaches associated with these technological tools are adapted to both the cognitive and structuring resources available in the classroom setting. Four teachers participated in the first study, undertaken as part of the InterActive Education project in Bristol; all of them used multimedia simulations in their lessons. The second study presented was part of the wider SET-IT project in Cambridge; 11 teachers in eight schools were observed using multimedia simulations, data logging tools and interactive whiteboards. Teachers were interviewed in all cases to elicit their pedagogical thinking about their classroom use of ICT.

The findings suggest that teachers are moving away from only using ‘real’ experiments in their practice. They are exploring the use of technologies to encourage students to engage in “What If” explorations where the outcomes of ‘virtual’ experiments can be immediately accessed, for example through using a simulation. However, this type of activity can serve just as a mechanism for revealing – and indeed reinforcing – students’ informal conceptions if cognitive conflict is not generated or remains unresolved. The teachers in our studies used simulations, data logging, projected animations and other dynamic digital resources as tools to encourage and support prediction and to demonstrate scientific concepts and physical processes – thereby ‘bridging the gap’ between scientific and informal knowledge. They also integrated technology carefully with other practical activities so as to support stepwise knowledge building, consolidation and application.

Research of this kind has design implications for both curriculum-related activities and emerging computer-based learning technologies, in terms of helping us to understand how teachers capitalise upon the technology available in supporting students to construct links between scientific theory and empirical evidence.

Keywords: Applications in subject areas; Pedagogical issues; Secondary education; Simulations; Teaching/learning strategies

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Pedagogic strategies for exploring the benefits of multimedia simulation to support science learning: findings from the interactive education project
2.1. Methods
2.2. Findings
2.3. Conclusions and recommendations
3. Situated expertise in technology-integrated science teaching: mediating learning and adapting to constraints
3.1. Method
3.2. Findings
3.3. Conclusions
4. Overall conclusions
Acknowledgements
References





Computers & Education
Volume 48, Issue 1, January 2007, Pages 137-152
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.