Elsevier

Computers and Composition

Volume 31, March 2014, Pages 29-42
Computers and Composition

The Weight of Curious Space: Rhetorical Events, Hackerspace, and Emergent Multimodal Assessment

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2013.12.002Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Outlines a theory of the unexpected in multimodal composition.

  • Promotes rhetorical and emergent assessment in learning environments we might imagine as composition hackerspaces.

  • Offers examples of writing student and instructor strategies for striking a productive “balance between convention and innovation” (Kuhn).

  • Describes the benefits of emergent multimodal assessment practices over locked-in rubrics.

Abstract

When we invite students to experiment with form, we invite ourselves as instructors to experiment with feedback, criteria, and assessment. We discover the need to own the complexity of multimodal compositions without risking assessment and pedagogical lock-in. Drawing on a conference series design, instructor-student interactions, and sample student work, this article outlines a theory that accounts for the unexpected and promotes rhetorical and emergent assessment in a composition hackerspace. The theory and examples offer writing students and instructors strategies for striking a productive “balance between convention and innovation” (Kuhn, 2008).

Section snippets

The walk-through :: Where

I’m in a black box, and I’m not comfortable.

I’m a writing teacher standing with a cohort of writing teachers, university colleagues, and community experts faced with over one hundred students about to rush the stage floor to have unscripted conversations about their research questions, their projected audiences, and their public delivery forms.

I’m also a writing teacher who believes that multimodality has been the ubiquitous “new normal” (Ball & Charlton, forthcoming) as long as I’ve cared to

Questions and conversations in the black box

At the first-year, advanced undergraduate, and graduate level, I introduce composition projects to students that generate panic in the face of freedom. I have found myself at a place where I am working only in transitional learning contexts, with students new to college, with students new to rhetorical theories, and with students new to graduate studies. It is this immersion in transition that led me to ask students to map their lives, their desires, their fears, and their theories of how the

The walk-away :: Why

Fostering emergent multimodal assessment through the use of multiple types of space matters because of student learning. Rhetorical savviness is about knowing criteria but also knowing them as living ranges of choice. I think it matters even more to writing program cohesion. Because I’m looking for ways to support new and experienced teachers without leveling or skilling, I have to find ways in which they can experience the evolution of assessment. Staging a conference sequence can work for

Colin Charlton is an associate professor of rhetoric, composition, and literacy studies at The University of Texas-Pan American, where he also directs first year writing programs. He has published on developmental reading and writing, writing program administration, and multimodality. Currently, he's working on a new kind of developmental textbook and a multimodal “coffee table book” about the scenes of writing and teaching

References (34)

  • Chanon Adsanatham

    Integrating assessment and instruction: Using student-generated grading criteria to evaluate multimodal digital projects

    Computers and Composition

    (2012)
  • Chanon Adsanatham et al.

    Going multimodal: Programmatic, curricular, and classroom change

  • Cheryl E. Ball

    Designerly ≠ readerly: Re-assessing multimodal and new media rubrics for use in writing studies

    Convergence

    (2006)
  • Ball, Cheryl E., & Charlton, Colin. (forthcoming). All texts are multimodal. In Linda Adler-Kassner & Elizabeth Wardle...
  • Barthes, Roland. (2010). Camera lucida: Reflections on photography. (Richard Howard, Trans.). New York: Hill and...
  • Berninger, Mathew D. (2007). Slow show. [Recorded by The National.] On Boxer. Beggars Banquet...
  • Collin Gifford Brooke

    Lingua fracta: Towards a rhetoric of new media

    (2009)
  • Gerald Graff

    Clueless in academe: How schooling obscures the life of the mind

    (2003)
  • Grassi, Ernesto. (2001). Rhetoric as philosophy: The humanist tradition. (John Michael Krois and Azizeh Azodi, Trans.)....
  • Rhonda C. Grego et al.

    Teaching/writing in thirdspaces: The studio approach

    (2008)
  • Nick Harkaway

    The blind giant: Being human in a digital world

    (2012)
  • Harrington, Susanmarie, & Weeden, Scott. (2009) Assessment changes for the long haul: Dynamic criteria mapping at...
  • Heidegger, Martin. (1968). What is called thinking? (J. Glenn Gray, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.(Original work...
  • Henry Jenkins

    Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide

    (2007)
  • Steven Johnson

    Where good ideas come from: The natural history of innovation

    (2011)
  • Jonke, Gert. (1994). Geometric regional novel. (Johannes W. Vazulik, Trans.). Champaign: Dalkey Archive Press.(Original...
  • Jonke, Gert. (2009). The system of Vienna: From heaven street to earth mound square. (Vincent Kling, Trans.)....
  • Cited by (0)

    Colin Charlton is an associate professor of rhetoric, composition, and literacy studies at The University of Texas-Pan American, where he also directs first year writing programs. He has published on developmental reading and writing, writing program administration, and multimodality. Currently, he's working on a new kind of developmental textbook and a multimodal “coffee table book” about the scenes of writing and teaching

    View full text