Elsevier

Computers & Chemical Engineering

Volume 73, 2 February 2015, Pages 43-48
Computers & Chemical Engineering

Note
Nonlinear model predictive control of an industrial polymerization process

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2014.11.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Maintain polymer quality requirements at specified production rates.

  • Achieve process objectives that have different settling times.

  • Address the computational needs of the associated dynamic optimization problem.

Abstract

Nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) is used to maintain and control polymer quality at specified production rates because the polymer quality measures have strong interacting nonlinearities with different temperatures and feed rates. Polymer quality measures that are available from the laboratory infrequently are controlled in closed-loop using a NMPC to set the temperature profile of the reactors. NMPC results in better control of polymer quality measures at different production rates as compared to using the nonlinear process model with reaction kinetics to implement offline targets for reactor temperatures.

Introduction

There are relatively few industrial applications of nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) compared to linear model predictive control (LMPC) (Qin and Badgwell, 2003), and most of these are in the field of polymerization control. Industrial NMPC applications have been simplified to decrease the computational burden ([Bindlish and Rawlings, 2003], [BenAmor et al., 2004], [Negrete et al., 2013]) and results have been shown in simulation cases. A prototypical industrial polymerization control case study has been presented (Congalidis et al., 1989) and used to develop control strategies in simulations ([Congalidis et al., 1989], [Bindlish and Rawlings, 2003]). A control scheme based on successive linearization has been used to track the optimal trajectory obtained by solving the unconstrained, nonlinear optimization problem offline without taking measured disturbances into account (Seki et al., 2001). Industrial implementation and results are reported for the controller, but the infrequent laboratory measurements are not used in the actual feedback control loop. Problems arise in applications of models to control actual industrial polymerization reactors due to significant process disturbances, modeling errors, and infrequent laboratory measurements. An important feature of industrial processes is that the key product quality measures are available only as laboratory measurements that have long sampling times with associated delays. A two-tier control scheme based on a linear model has been used to deal with the unavailability of on-line key product quality variable measurements (Ogunnaike, 1994). In the two-tier system, the set points for the on-line outputs are based on the targets for the laboratory outputs. Hence, the infrequent laboratory measurements are not used in the feedback control loop. Prior to the NMPC development for the industrial process discussed in this paper, a two-tier system that consisted of the non-linear process model with reaction kinetics was used to establish offline steady-state targets for reactor temperatures to maintain laboratory quality measures for polymer. There was no actual feedback control of laboratory quality measures (Fig. 1).

Dow's first application of a commercial nonlinear model predictive control technology that uses the laboratory quality measures in the feedback control loop is presented. The industrial nonlinear model predictive control problem has the following challenges

  • Long laboratory sampling times for controlled polymer quality attributes (0.5–1 day)

  • Varying dead times (2–7 days) and gains (multiplier of 1–20) for polymer quality attributes with respect to reactor temperatures

  • Process models need to extend for extremely low feed rates (approximately 35% of normal rates)

  • Process also occasionally operates with one of the seven reactors bypassed for maintenance

  • For the first four reactors, recycle streams can only be manually set for heating or cooling

A linear model predictive controller (LMPC) will not be able to achieve the process objectives because there are strong nonlinear dependencies for polymer quality attributes with reactor temperatures and feed.

The physical details and chemistry for the industrial process are not disclosed because of proprietary reasons. The industrial polymerization process consists of seven well mixed reactors in series, where the extent of reaction is set by level and temperature in each reactor (Fig. 2). The copolymerization of monomer and comonomer is carried out using a catalyst to make a polymer characterized by polymer viscosity, unreacted monomer content and byproduct content. Comonomer composition in the feed is set at a stoichiometric excess value to minimize the unreacted monomer content in the polymer product. The catalyst dissolved in a solvent is also fed separately to the first reactor. The flow rate and composition of the feed streams are measured on-line along with the reactor temperatures and levels. Off-line laboratory measurements are made for the polymer viscosity, unreacted monomer content and byproduct content. Each reactor has a recycle stream, whose temperature is controlled by heating or cooling it. The reactor temperature is controlled by manipulating the recycle stream temperature.

Section snippets

Model development

A validated fundamental kinetic model based on first principles has been developed to capture the information in the process output measurements. Similar process models for a well-mixed polymerization reactor have been used for simulation of control strategies ([Congalidis et al., 1989], [Bindlish and Rawlings, 2003]). The differential material balances including the rate expressions and the energy balance coupled with the equations for the physical phenomena constitute the dynamic process

Results

The data and parameters shown for the industrial process have been scaled to protect proprietary information. The application of a commercial NMPC technology with the laboratory quality measures in the feedback control loop has been extremely successful for plant operations. Although LMPC has been widely used in industrial applications compared to NMPC, it would not have been able to achieve the process objectives because there are strong nonlinear dependencies for polymer quality measures with

Conclusions

The industrial nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) has been in continuous use since October 2012 to maintain polymer quality at specified production rates. The NMPC application has been able to achieve improved feedback control of polymer quality measures that show strong nonlinearities with reactor temperatures and feed. After meeting the polymer quality and feed requirements, the NMPC has been enhanced to minimize the byproduct content. A cascade NMPC scheme was implemented to achieve

References (11)

  • S. BenAmor et al.

    Polymer grade transition control using advanced real-time optimization software

    J Process Control

    (2004)
  • R. Bindlish et al.

    Target linearization and model predictive control of polymerization processes

    AIChE J

    (2003)
  • J.P. Congalidis et al.

    Feedforward and feedback control of a solution copolymerization reactor

    AIChE J

    (1989)
  • J.H. Lee et al.

    Extended Kalman filter based nonlinear model predictive control

    Ind Eng Chem Res

    (1994)
  • K. Naidoo et al.

    Experiences with nonlinear MPC in polymer manufacturing

    Assessment and future directions of nonlinear model predictive control, vol. 358

    (2007)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text