ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Computational Biology and Chemistry
Volume 30, Issue 1, February 2006, Pages 12-20
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (285 K)

  E-mail Article   
  Add to my Quick Links   
Bookmark and share in 2collab (opens in new window)
Request permission to reuse this article
  Cited By in Scopus (0)
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2005.09.007    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

Multilocus consensus genetic maps (MCGM): Formulation, algorithms, and results

D.I. Mestera, Y.I. Ronina, M.A. Korostishevskyb, V.L. Pikusa, A.E. Glazmana and A.B. Korola, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aInstitute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Haifa 31905, Israel bDepartment of Human Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel

Received 20 September 2005; 
revised 30 September 2005; 
accepted 30 September 2005. 
Available online 21 November 2005.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

In process of creating genetic maps different labs/research groups obtain overlapping parts of the map. Merging these parts into one integrative map is based on looking for maximum shared marker orders among the maps. Really, not all shared markers of such maps have consensus order that obstructs building of the integrative maps. In this paper we propose a new approach to build verified multilocus consensus genetic maps in which shared markers always are integrated in stable consensus order. The approach is based on combined analysis of initial mapping data rather than manipulating with previously constructed maps. We show that more effective and reliable solutions may be obtained based on “synchronized ordering” facilitated by cycles of “re-sampling → ordering → removing unstable markers”. The proposed formulation of consensus genetic mapping can be considered as a version of traveling salesperson problem (TSP) that we refer to as synchronized-TSP. From the viewpoint of optimization, synchronized-TSP belongs to discrete constrained optimization problems. Earlier we developed new powerful and fast guided evolution strategy algorithms for some types of discrete constrained optimization. These algorithms were used here as a basis for solving more challenging problems of consensual marker ordering.

Keywords: Multilocus ordering; TSP; Synchronized discrete optimization; Re-sampling verification; Unstable neighborhoods

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. MCGM problems: mathematical models and algorithms
2.1. Consensus order formulation
2.2. The essence and particularities of the approach
2.3. Choosing optimization algorithm for synchronized TSP
2.4. The algorithm for consensus map constructing
2.4.1. Phase 1
2.4.2. Phase 2
2.4.3. Phase 3
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Gender-dependent recombination distance matrixes (MCGM, case B)
3.2. Multilocus ordering with data from different mapping populations (MCGM, case C)
4. Concluding remarks
Acknowledgements
Appendix A. Appendix: Algorithm of searching for all consensual orders
References




 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.