ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Computer Networks
Volume 50, Issue 15, 18 October 2006, Pages 2820-2838
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (623 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2005.09.038    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Contour maps: Monitoring and diagnosis in sensor networks

Xiaoqiao Menga, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Thyaga Nandagopalb, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Li Lib, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Songwu Lua, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aComputer Science Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States bBell Laboratories, Holmdel, NJ 07733, United States

Received 26 January 2005; 
revised 17 August 2005; 
accepted 30 September 2005. 
Responsible Editor: E. Ekici. 
Available online 7 December 2005.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Large-scale sensor networks impose energy and communication constraints, thus it is difficult to collect data from each individual sensor node and process it at the sink. In this paper, we propose an efficient data-collection scheme that can be used for event monitoring or network-wide diagnosis. Our scheme relies on the well-known representation of data—contour maps, which trade off accuracy with the amount of samples. The scheme consists of three novel algorithms to build contour maps: distributed spatial and temporal data suppression, contour reconstruction at the sink via interpolation and smoothing, and an efficient mechanism to convey routing information over multiple hops. By reducing the number of transmissions required to convey relevant information to the sink, the proposed contour mapping scheme saves energy and improves network lifetime. In a sharp contrast to related work in this area, the scheme does not require all nodes to explicitly share information.

The contour mapping scheme can be applied for tasks such as: (1) presenting a global picture of the network in both temporal and spatial domains, (2) being used as a diagnosis tool, e.g., to detect faulty sensors and to scan for residual energy, (3) working in concert with in-network aggregation schemes to further reduce the communication overhead of aggregation schemes. The proposed scheme imposes little processing and storage overhead, allowing for the sensor networking paradigm of ‘dumb sensor, smart sink’ which enables economical deployment of large-scale sensor networks.

Simulation results show that our scheme is resilient to both high packet loss rate and measurement noise. The design is also energy efficient, resulting in up to an-order-of-magnitude power savings when compared with the base line scheme where every sensor sends its report to the sink.

Keywords: Sensor network; Contour map; Spatio-temporal sampling

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Network model
3. Problem description and design overview
3.1. Data representation using contour maps
3.2. Contour map construction and its applications
4. Related work
5. Algorithms for contour map construction
5.1. Local suppression at each sensor
5.1.1. Spatial suppression
5.1.2. Temporal suppression
5.2. Interpolation and smoothing at the sink
5.2.1. Interpolation algorithm
5.2.2. Smoothing constructed contour
5.3. Discussions
6. Extensions
6.1. Multihop local suppression
6.1.1. Routing information
6.1.2. Interpolation algorithm at the sink
6.2. Interaction with data aggregation
7. Application scenarios
7.1. Spatio-temporal event monitoring
7.2. Residual energy monitoring
7.3. Faulty sensor detection
8. Performance evaluation
8.1. Experimental settings
8.2. Performance of contour construction algorithm
8.2.1. Quality of reconstructed contour maps
8.2.2. Impact of δ
8.2.3. Sensitivity to noise
8.2.4. Energy saving
8.3. Detection of faulty sensors
8.4. Spatial–temporal event monitoring
8.5. Contour maps for residual energy monitoring
8.6. Comparison with CAG
9. Conclusion
References
Vitae














Computer Networks
Volume 50, Issue 15, 18 October 2006, Pages 2820-2838
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.