ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Computer Networks
Volume 50, Issue 13, 15 September 2006, Pages 2295-2311
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (267 K)

Article Toolbox
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2005.09.010    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

A potential game approach to distributed power control and scheduling

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

T. HeikkinenCorresponding Author Contact Information, a, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aMTT Economic Research, Luutnantintie 13, 00410 Helsinki, Finland


Received 26 September 2004; 
revised 31 August 2005; 
accepted 2 September 2005. 
Responsible Editor: E. Chong. 
Available online 5 October 2005.

Abstract

Distributed solutions to resource allocation are motivated by the need to cope with the complexity in modern communication networks. The purpose of this paper is to discuss decentralized resource allocation in a self-organizing network from the viewpoint of potential games. The focus is on power allocation and scheduling in a congested distributed network such as a wireless ad hoc network.

Noncooperative resource allocation is studied as a “potential” game, where the potential function is a common proxy objective, formalizing the implicit joint target of the noncooperative players. The potential function can be used to evaluate the system-level efficiency of noncooperative resource allocation. Examples of potential games are discussed in various contexts of distributed resource allocation. A game with discrete or convex strategy sets possessing a potential function has convergent greedy dynamics. A resource price determines the structure of a potential game.

Keywords: Resource allocation; Power control; Game theory; Ad hoc networks

Article Outline

1. Introduction and related work
2. Distributed power control
2.1. Centralized PC and its distributed solution based on local information
2.2. Noncooperative power allocation
3. Resource allocation games of strategic substitutes/complements
3.1. Applications in power allocation games
3.2. Potential function
4. Potential games of power allocation
4.1. A received power game with binary discrete choice
4.2. A general utility model of power allocation
4.3. Transmit power allocation games
4.4. Weighted games
5. Distributed scheduling
5.1. Distributed scheduling in a time-division based system
5.2. Distributed scheduling in a multi-access network
6. Implementing efficient decentralized allocation
6.1. On congestion pricing
6.2. Agent-based resource allocation: potential approach
7. Concluding remarks
Appendix A
Appendix B. Appendix
Appendix C. Appendix
References

Corresponding Author Contact InformationThis work was carried out while the author was with Department of Management Science, Management School, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YX, United Kingdom. Tel.: +358 400608573.

Computer Networks
Volume 50, Issue 13, 15 September 2006, Pages 2295-2311
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.