ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Computer Networks
Volume 46, Issue 5, 5 December 2004, Pages 605-634
Military Communications Systems and Technologies
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (666 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2004.06.007    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

A line in the sand: a wireless sensor network for target detection, classification, and trackingstar, open

A. Aroraa, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, P. Duttaa, E-mail The Corresponding Author, S. Bapata, E-mail The Corresponding Author, V. Kulathumania, E-mail The Corresponding Author, H. Zhanga, E-mail The Corresponding Author, V. Naika, E-mail The Corresponding Author, V. Mittala, E-mail The Corresponding Author, H. Caoa, E-mail The Corresponding Author, M. Demirbasa, E-mail The Corresponding Author, M. Goudab, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Y. Choib, E-mail The Corresponding Author, T. Hermanc, E-mail The Corresponding Author, S. Kulkarnid, E-mail The Corresponding Author, U. Arumugamd, E-mail The Corresponding Author, M. Nesterenkoe, E-mail The Corresponding Author, A. Vorae, E-mail The Corresponding Author and M. Miyashitae, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA bDepartment of Computer Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA cDepartment of Computer Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA dDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA eDepartment of Computer Science, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, USA

Available online 23 July 2004.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Intrusion detection is a surveillance problem of practical import that is well suited to wireless sensor networks. In this paper, we study the application of sensor networks to the intrusion detection problem and the related problems of classifying and tracking targets. Our approach is based on a dense, distributed, wireless network of multi-modal resource-poor sensors combined into loosely coherent sensor arrays that perform in situ detection, estimation, compression, and exfiltration. We ground our study in the context of a security scenario called “A Line in the Sand” and accordingly define the target, system, environment, and fault models. Based on the performance requirements of the scenario and the sensing, communication, energy, and computation ability of the sensor network, we explore the design space of sensors, signal processing algorithms, communications, networking, and middleware services. We introduce the influence field, which can be estimated from a network of binary sensors, as the basis for a novel classifier. A contribution of our work is that we do not assume a reliable network; on the contrary, we quantitatively analyze the effects of network unreliability on application performance. Our work includes multiple experimental deployments of over 90 sensor nodes at MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa, FL, as well as other field experiments of comparable scale. Based on these experiences, we identify a set of key lessons and articulate a few of the challenges facing extreme scaling to tens or hundreds of thousands of sensor nodes.

Keywords: Wireless sensor networks; Smart dust; Target classification and tracking; Reliability; Stabilization

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Related work
3. Problem formulation
3.1. User requirements and performance metrics
3.2. Target models
3.3. System model
3.4. Environment model
3.5. Fault model
4. Design considerations
4.1. Reliability
4.2. Energy
4.3. Complexity
5. Sensing
5.1. Phenomenology
5.2. Sensing options
5.3. Sensor selection
6. Signal detection and parameter estimation
6.1. Magnetic
6.2. Radar
7. Classification
7.1. The influence field as a spatial statistic
7.2. Classifier design
7.3. Validation
8. Tracking
9. Time synchronization
9.1. Algorithm
9.2. Accuracy
9.3. Results
10. Communications and networking
10.1. Routing algorithm
10.2. Reliable communications
10.3. Experimental results
11. Implementation
11.1. System architecture
11.2. Network nodes
11.3. Sensor boards
11.4. Packaging
11.5. Visualization
12. Key lessons
12.1. Impact of network unreliability
12.2. Testing at scale
12.3. Unanticipated faulty behavior
12.4. Quality of network reprogramming
13. Conclusions and future work
References
Vitae








Computer Networks
Volume 46, Issue 5, 5 December 2004, Pages 605-634
Military Communications Systems and Technologies
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.