The AFLOW Library of Crystallographic Prototypes: Part 3

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110450Get rights and content

Abstract

The AFLOW Library of Crystallographic Prototypes has been extended to include a total of 1,100 common crystal structural prototypes (510 new ones with Part 3), comprising all of the inorganic crystal structures defined in the seven-volume Strukturbericht series published in Germany from 1937 through 1943. We cover a history of the Strukturbericht designation system, the evolution of the system over time, and the first comprehensive index of inorganic Strukturbericht designations ever published.

Introduction

Crystal structure classification began near the dawn of X-ray Crystallography with early works by Wyckoff [1], Ewald's 1927 Handbuch der Physik article [2], and the Landolt-Börnstein 1927 supplement [3]. In the next few decades, these catalogs proliferated, including the Strukturbericht (Structure Reports) series [4], Pearson's Handbook of Lattice Spacings and Structures of Metals and Alloys[5], [6], Smithells's Metals Reference Book[7], [8], and Wyckoff's updated Structure of Crystals[9]. In later years, Pearson's Handbook[10] and Smithells Metals Reference Book[11] acquired new editors and even today produce periodic editions. Subsequent works, such as the Gmelin Handbook[12], also appear regularly. As online access became the norm at the beginning of this century, electronic resources appeared, including the American Mineralogist Crystal Structure Database[13], which compiles the structures of minerals from a variety of sources, and the SpringerMaterials website [14], an extension of Pearson's Handbook that also incorporates the Landolt-Börnstein series.

Computational material-property databases have also become available: for example AFLOW (Automatic FLOW for Materials Discovery) [15], [16], [17], Novel Materials Discovery (NoMaD) [18], the Materials Project [19], and the Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD) [20].

While these print and electronic databases contain a vast number of crystal structures, many are not optimized for use in materials computations, e.g., by providing structural information in a format which can be read by one of the common density functional computer codes. In addition, while most of these resources make their data available in standard formats, such as space group/Wyckoff positions or a Crystallographic Information File (CIF) [21], these forms still pose a challenge for novice researchers. Therefore, it is desirable to have a database that addresses both of these concerns.

The AFLOW Library of Crystallographic Prototypes (hereafter AFLOW Prototype Encyclopedia or Prototype Encyclopedia for brevity) [22], [23] has been designed with these objectives in mind. Integrated with the AFLOW computational framework, it can provide structural input for a wide variety of materials computational programs, including VASP [24], Quantum ESPRESSO[25], FHI-AIMS [26], ABINIT [27], and ELK [28] as well as in CIF format. Each structure's web page provides all the necessary crystallographic information, including space group, lattice vectors, and Wyckoff positions. In addition, the formulas for the primitive vectors and basis vectors of the structure are shown. This is particularly useful for students and novice researchers, as it shows the relationship between the standard crystallographic coordinates needed for computational work and the Cartesian positions of the atom in the primitive and/or conventional unit cell. If the desired chemical composition for the structure is not the prototype, the chemistry and primitive cell dimensions can be changed by the user before generating the structural input. Finally, the structure may be viewed as a primitive cell, conventional cell, or supercell at a variety of angles and magnifications via JSmol [29].

This article is about the ongoing development of the AFLOW Prototype Encyclopedia. In Part 1 [22], we introduced the Prototype Encyclopedia, which began as an updated version of the now-defunct Naval Research Laboratory “Structure of Crystals” web site. This was a collection of crystal structures that we found useful as a starting point for computational studies of materials. One feature of the site was that it included a number of well-known Strukturbericht designations, from the German effort to classify common crystal structures [4]. This article also provided a brief introduction of the crystallography needed to understand crystal structures, as well as a description of the entries in the AFLOW Prototype Encyclopedia for each structure. In all, 288 structures were included in the initial Prototype Encyclopedia.

Part 2 [23] continued the discussion of crystallography by reviewing the enantiomorphic space groups, which are pairs of space groups that are mirror images of each other. As part of our teaching mission, we also described the Wigner-Seitz version of the primitive unit cell of a crystal, and discussed the 17 two-dimensional “plane groups,” the analog of the 230 three-dimensional space groups. Another 302 structures were added to the database to bring the total to 590, with at least one structure shown in each of the 230 space groups.

In this article, Part 3, we add 510 new structures to the encyclopedia. These include all of the inorganic Strukturbericht designations which had not previously been cataloged by us. The Strukturbericht classification scheme was one of the earliest attempts to group elements1 and compounds into common crystal structures. However, despite its historical importance there is no available history of its development, and until now there has been no comprehensive index of all the Strukturbericht designations that were defined in the series or added by others.

Recently, M. J. Mehl published a brief history of the development of the Strukturbericht designations [31]. In Part 3, we improve and extend that work, beginning with the introduction of these labels by Ewald [2] through the publication of the seven Strukturbericht volumes and the post-World War II extensions to the scheme made by Smithells [8], Pearson [5], and others. The Strukturbericht classifications changed over the run of the series, and several structures were published under multiple designations. Here, we track all of those changes.

The article is organized as follows: in Sections 2 and 3, we present common prototype classification schemes, followed by a short history of the development and presentation of Strukturbericht designations. As the Strukturbericht designations changed over time, Section 4 discusses the history of the major categories and sub-categories, as well as our editorial decisions as to which label should be used for a given prototype. Section 5 presents what we believe to be the first comprehensive list of Strukturbericht designations for elements and inorganic compounds, including all references to labels which we could find in the literature, with a link to the corresponding online pages in the AFLOW Prototype Encyclopedia. Section 6 describes AFLOW software modules that will be used to identify and classify new prototypes for future iterations of this work. Additionally, Section 7 introduces an online form for users to suggest new prototypes to enrich the Encyclopedia. Section 8 provides information about AFLOW Schools: hands-on workshops for students and researchers to learn about structural analysis methods — especially those discussed in Parts 1, 2, and 3 of this work — as well as other topics related to computational materials science. Section 9 summarizes our conclusions. This is followed by a list of all 510 new prototypes we have included in the Prototype Encyclopedia since the publication of Part 2.

Section snippets

Crystallographic Classification Schemes

Just before the First World War, Max von Laue suggested that diffraction of X-rays through crystals would produce a pattern which could be used to determine the crystal structure [32]. Shortly thereafter, this technique was also applied by Bragg and Bragg [33] and Hull [34] to analyze the structures of diamond and graphite, respectively. Over the next decade, the structures of hundreds of elements and compounds were determined [2], [3], [35], [36].

It was soon obvious that nature is in the habit

A Brief History of Strukturbericht Symbols2

This Strukturbericht scheme was introduced by Ewald in his review of X-ray crystallography for the 1927 edition of the Handbuch der Physik[2]. The 1927 supplement to the 1923 edition of Landolt-Börnstein [3] also contains a shortened version of Ewald's list, presumably taken from the Handbuch, but we have not been able to determine which one was actually published first.

The structural cataloging method devised by Ewald was rather simple:

  • Purely elemental structures were given designations

Strukturbericht categories and subcategories

The original Strukturbericht scheme developed by Ewald was modified and extended over the years, and until now there has been no comprehensive list of Strukturbericht categories or designations. This section and the next correct this omission. Here we describe all the primary (A, B, C, …) Strukturbericht categories, while the next section will list every Strukturbericht designation.

Primary categories from D through S are broken into smaller secondary categories, e.g., D0, E1, F2, which we will

Index of Strukturbericht symbols in the Prototype Encyclopedia

Here we list all of the “inorganic” (not beginning with O) Strukturbericht designations we have found in the literature, with a link to the corresponding web page in the Prototype Encyclopedia. Our primary source is the seven volumes of Strukturbericht, but we include designations from other sources as well.

The list has five columns:

    SB:

    This is the Strukturbericht designation appearing in the literature. When a structure has multiple designations, we choose one of these, usually the latest, to

Future work

New structure-types are constantly being investigated for inclusion into the Prototype Encyclopedia. AFLOW's symmetry (AFLOW-SYM) [60] and crystal prototype finder (AFLOW-XtalFinder) [37] software modules are actively being employed to identify and classify prototypes from literature (e.g., ICSD [61]). Unique prototypes — after comparing against those in Parts 1, 2, and 3 — will be added to future installments of the Prototype Encyclopedia. The symmetries of the prototypes (i.e., Pearson

User contributions

Online functionality has been developed to analyze the prototype of a user's input structure (http://aflow.org/prototype-encyclopedia/xtal-finder.html). The structure is automatically compared to all existing prototype entries via AFLOW-XtalFinder [37]. If a matching entry is found, the relevant prototype information is returned (e.g., prototype label and parameters, Strukturbericht designation, symmetry descriptions, and weblink to the entry). If no matching entry is found — signaling a new

Outreach and education

AFLOW Schools (http://aflow.org/aflow-school/) provide learning modules to teach the theory of and provide hands-on examples for analyzing the structure of materials; including crystallographic symmetry, prototype classification, and structural similarity. Modules are also available for studying thermodynamics (polar and non-polar materials), accessing data in AFLOW.org (APIs), calculating thermomechanical properties, modeling disordered compounds, and predicting the properties of materials

Conclusion

This article presents the newest additions to the AFLOW Library of Crystallographic Prototypes, which now contains 1,100 entries. This includes all of the inorganic crystal structures that were given Strukturbericht designations in the original volumes or by references found in the literature. We also provide a brief history of the development of the Strukturbericht designations and the changes to the system over time.

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by DOD-ONR (N00014-15-1-2863, N00014-16-1-2326, N00014-17-1-2876, N00014-21-1-2132, N00014-21-1-2515) and NSF (DMR-1921909). David Hicks acknowledges support from the Department of Defense through the National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) Fellowship Program. Michael Mehl would like to thank Lauren Mehl, Stephanie Mehl, and Gus Hart for the donation of several of the original Strukturbericht volumes as well as the Trotter and Bree cumulative

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (61)

  • W.B. Pearson

    A Handbook of Lattice Spacings and Structures of Metals and Alloys

    (1958)
  • W.B. Pearson

    A Handbook of Lattice Spacings and Structures of Metals and Alloys

    (1967)
  • C.J. Smithells

    Metals Reference Book

    (1949)
  • C.J. Smithells

    Metals Reference Book

    (1955)
  • R.W.G. Wyckoff

    The Structure of Crystals, vol. I-VI

    (1963)
    (1971)
  • P. Villars et al.

    Pearson's Handbook of Crystallographic Data for Intermetallic Phases

    (1991)
  • E. Parthé et al.

    Standardized Data and Crystal Chemical Characterization of Inorganic Structure Types

    (1993)
  • R.T. Downs et al.

    The American Mineralogist Crystal Structure Database

    Am. Mineral.

    (2003)
  • C. Toher et al.

    The AFLOW Fleet for Materials Discovery

  • C. Oses et al.

    Data-driven design of inorganic materials with the Automatic Flow Framework for Materials Discovery

    MRS Bull.

    (2018)
  • M. Scheffler et al.

    The NoMaD Repository

    (2014)
  • A. Jain et al.

    The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation

    APL Materials

    (2013)
  • J.E. Saal et al.

    Materials Design and Discovery with High-Throughput Density Functional Theory: The Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD)

    JOM

    (2013)
  • G. Kresse et al.

    Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set

    Phys. Rev. B

    (1996)
  • P. Giannozzi et al.

    QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials

    J. Phys.: Condens. Matt.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (29)

    • aflow++: A C++ framework for autonomous materials design

      2023, Computational Materials Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      There are three built-in functions to compare multiple structures automatically (Fig. 2(d)): i. compare structures provided by a user, ii. compare an input structure to prototypes in aflow++ [15–17], and iii. compare an input structure to entries in the aflow.org repositories.

    • aflow.org: A web ecosystem of databases, software and tools

      2023, Computational Materials Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      We invite users to submit new structures for inclusion in the database. See The AFLOW Prototype Encyclopedia: Part 3, [39] and AFLOW-XtalFinder at aflow.org/prototype-encyclopedia/xtal-finder.html for more information. Autonomous computational frameworks such as AFLOW are powerful tools with a rich diversity of features.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text