ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Computer Communications
Volume 30, Issue 2, 15 January 2007, Pages 358-368
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (562 K)

  E-mail Article   
  Add to my Quick Links   
Bookmark and share in 2collab (opens in new window)
Request permission to reuse this article
  Cited By in Scopus (0)
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2006.09.002    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

A fair bandwidth distribution mechanism in a Diffserv network

Sangdok Moa, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Kwangsue ChungCorresponding Author Contact Information, a, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aSchool of Electronics Engineering, Kwangwoon University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Received 5 April 2006; 
revised 4 September 2006; 
accepted 6 September 2006. 
Available online 4 October 2006.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Previous works for the Assured Forwarding (AF) service in a Diffserv network have no sufficient consideration on the target rate and the effect of RTT and UDP in achieving the fairness of bandwidth share. Also previous works act like Best-effort service in an Under-Provisioned Network (UPN) condition. In this paper, in order to solve these problems, we propose the Proportionally Fair Differentiated Service Architecture (PFDSA), which is composed of tcp-microflow based Target rate and RTT Aware Three Color Marker (tmTRA3CM), udp-microflow based Three Color Marker (um3CM), Target Rate Based Dropper (TRBD), and Target Rate Adjusting Function (TRAF). In the results of comparisons on the performance among existing mechanisms and the PFDSA in the OPN (Over-Provisioned Network) and the UPN conditions, the PFDSA was able to further mitigate the RTT and UDP effects than the previous works. The PFDSA was shown to provide better fair bandwidth distribution proportional to various target rates even in the UPN condition.

Keywords: Diffserv; RTT; UDP; Target rate; Bandwidth; Fairness

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Background and related work
2.1. Time sliding window three color marker
2.1.1. TSW meter
2.1.2. TSW marker
2.1.3. Problems of TSW3CM
2.2. Intelligent traffic conditioner
2.2.1. RATC
2.2.2. TATC
2.2.3. DDPM mechanism
2.2.4. Problems of ITC
3. Fair bandwidth distribution mechanism
3.1. Design of proportionally fair differentiated service architecture
3.2. Function of an edge node in the PFDSA
3.2.1. tmTRA3CM
3.2.2. um3CM
3.3. Function of a core node in the PFDSA
3.3.1. TRBD mechanism
3.3.2. TRAF mechanism
4. Simulations and evaluation
4.1. Comparison according to different RTTs
4.2. Comparison according to the effect of UDP
4.3. Comparison according to different target rates
4.4. Comparison in various effects coexisting condition
5. Conclusion and further work
Acknowledgements
References
Vitae













Computer Communications
Volume 30, Issue 2, 15 January 2007, Pages 358-368
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.