ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Computer Communications
Volume 30, Issue 2, 15 January 2007, Pages 261-268
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (296 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2006.08.014    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Fisheye zone routing protocol: A multi-level zone routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks

Chun-Chuan YangCorresponding Author Contact Information, a, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Li-Pin Tsenga

aMultimedia and Communications Laboratory, Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Chi Nan University, Taiwan, ROC

Received 13 September 2005; 
revised 15 August 2006; 
accepted 18 August 2006. 
Available online 12 September 2006.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP) provides a flexible solution for discovering and maintaining routes in the MANET. By adopting the idea of Fisheye State Routing in ZRP, a more efficient protocol called Fisheye Zone Routing Protocol (FZRP) was proposed in the paper. FZRP provides the advantage of a larger zone with only a little increase of the maintenance overhead. Two levels of routing zone are defined in FZRP: the basic zone and the extended zone. Different updating frequencies of changes of link connectivity are associated with the basic zone and extended zone. Simulation study has shown that FZRP is more efficient than ZRP in terms of route finding cost with only a little increase of the maintenance overhead.

Keywords: MANET; Routing; ZRP; Fisheye

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Related work
2.1. Fisheye state routing (FSR)
2.2. Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP)
3. Fisheye Zone Routing Protocol
3.1. Basic idea and zone maintenance
3.2. Route acquisition
3.3. Impact of uncertainty
3.4. Route maintenance
3.5. Discussion
4. Performance evaluation
4.1. Simulation environment and performance criteria
4.2. Performance comparison
4.3. Impact of F and RE
5. Conclusion
Acknowledgements
References
Vitae













Computer Communications
Volume 30, Issue 2, 15 January 2007, Pages 261-268
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.