ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Computer Communications
Volume 28, Issue 18, 1 November 2005, Pages 2070-2081
Current Areas of Interest in End-to-End QoS
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (424 K)

  E-mail Article   
  Add to my Quick Links   
Bookmark and share in 2collab (opens in new window)
Request permission to reuse this article
  Cited By in Scopus (0)
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2004.07.035    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Capacity requirements of traffic handling schemes in multi-service networks

Towela P.R. Nyirenda-Jerea, Victor S. Frosta, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Nail Akarb

aDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Information and Telecommunication Technology Center, University of Kansas, 2335 Irving Hill Road, Lawrence, KS 66045-7612, USA bDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey

Received 29 July 2004; 
accepted 29 July 2004. 
Available online 17 September 2004.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

This paper deals with the impact of traffic handling mechanisms on capacity for different network architectures. Three traffic handling models are considered: per-flow, class-based and best-effort (BE). These models can be used to meet service guarantees, the major differences being in their complexity of implementations and in the quantity of network resources that must be provided. In this study, the performance is fixed and the required capacity determined for various combinations of traffic handling architectures for edge-core networks. This study provides a comparison of different QoS architectures. One key result of this work is that on the basis of capacity requirements, there is no significant difference between semi-aggregate traffic handling and per-flow traffic handling. However, best-effort handling requires significantly more capacity as compared to the other methods.

Keywords: Network engineering; Internet QoS; Multimedia networking; Network capacity planning

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Edge-core network capacity analysis using network calculus
2.1. Framework
2.2. End-to-end delay
2.3. Comparison of capacity requirements
3. Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Topology construction
4.2. Capacity requirements with symmetric traffic distribution
4.2.1. Impact of edge traffic handling
4.2.2. Impact of network diameter
4.3. Effect of projections on traffic growth
4.4. Effect of delay ratios
5. Conclusion
References
Vitae







Computer Communications
Volume 28, Issue 18, 1 November 2005, Pages 2070-2081
Current Areas of Interest in End-to-End QoS
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.