Copyright © 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Benefits of traffic engineering using QoS routing schemes and network controls
Received 31 July 2002;
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.
Abstract
We demonstrate the benefits of traffic engineering by studying three realistic network models derived from an actual service provider network. We evaluate traffic engineering in the presence of QoS-based routing schemes compared with Destination-Based Routing, the default routing behavior for the Internet. We also simulate prioritization of important traffic flows by implementing priority in one or more of the path caching, path ordering, and actual route selection phases of the constraint-based routing framework. We observe that traffic engineering can provide 20–50% network capacity savings. We also observe that prioritization in more than one phase of constraint-based routing can provide even more significant benefits.
Author Keywords: Author Keywords: Traffic engineering; Constraint-based routing; Quality of service routing
Article Outline
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Priority mechanisms
- 2.1. Priority in the PPC phase (number of cached paths)
- 2.2. Priority in the UPO phase (choice of routing schemes)
- 2.3. Priority in the ARS phase (activation of control)
- 3. Simulation environment and network setup
- 3.1. Network topology
- 3.2. Traffic models
- 3.3. Service classes
- 3.4. Traffic matrix
- 3.5. Performance metric
- 3.6. Notation
- 3.7. Experiment setup
- 4. Results and discussion
- 4.1. Basic results
- 4.2. Changing traffic matrices between 5% S1 and 20% S1
- 4.3. Interactions between routing schemes, Ks1, and Kosvc
- 4.4. Changing network capacity
- 4.5. Overloaded networks—Networks II and III
- 5. Conclusion
- References






E-mail Article
Add to my Quick Links

Cited By in Scopus (2)






