ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Combustion and Flame
Volume 135, Issue 4, December 2003, Pages 421-439
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (521 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2003.07.003    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2003 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Science Inc.

Analysis of non-adiabatic heat-recirculating combustors

Paul D. RonneyCorresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, a

a Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1453, USA

Received 24 June 2002; 
revised 17 July 2003. 
Available online 16 December 2003.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

A simple first-principles model of counter current heat-recirculating combustors is developed, including the effects of heat transfer from the product gas stream to the reactant stream, heat loss to ambient, and heat conduction in the streamwise direction through the dividing wall (and heat transfer surface) between the reactant and product streams. It is shown that streamwise conduction through the wall has a major effect on the operating limits of the combustor, especially at small dimensionless mass fluxes (M) or Reynolds numbers that would be characteristic of microscale devices. In particular, if this conduction is neglected, there is no small-M extinction limit because smaller M leads to larger heat recirculation and longer residence times that overcome heat loss if M is sufficiently small. In contrast, even a small effect of conduction along this surface leads to significantly higher minimum M. Comparison is made with an alternative configuration of a flame stabilized at the exit of a tube, where heat recirculation occurs via conduction through tube wall; it is found that the counter-current exchanger configuration provides superior performance under similar operating conditions. Implications for microscale combustion are discussed.

Author Keywords: Extinction; Microscale combustion; Counter flow heat exchangers

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Counter-current heat exchanger/combustor
2.1. Approach
2.2. Analysis
2.3. Choice of baseline numerical parameters
2.4. Results - infinite reaction rates
2.5. Results - finite-rate chemistry
2.6. Effect of boundary conditions
3. Combustors with conductive tube walls
3.1. Analysis
3.2. Results
4. Application to microscale devices
5. Discussion and conclusions
Acknowledgements
References












Combustion and Flame
Volume 135, Issue 4, December 2003, Pages 421-439
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.