Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
High ionic strength electrokinetics of clay minerals
Introduction
When the ionic strength is not too high, addition of 1-1 electrolyte (alkali nitrate V, chlorate VII or halide) at otherwise the same experimental conditions induces a decrease in the absolute value of the electrokinetic potential [1]. Then addition of even more electrolyte would depress the electrokinetic potential to zero. Till very recently direct measurements of the electrokinetic potential at high ionic strength were not possible, and it was believed that the electrokinetic potential at electrolyte concentrations of about 1 M is about zero. Indeed, popular models of the electric double layer (triple layer model, Stern) produce ζ potentials in the range of ±1 mV in 1 M 1-1 electrolyte (with model parameters, which give reasonable ζ potentials and surface charge densities at lower ionic strengths). Recently, the electroacoustic method made it possible to perform measurements of the electrokinetic potential at electrolyte concentrations of 1 M and even more. More recently, new equipment made it possible to perform measurements at high ionic strengths also by means of electrophoresis [2]. These measurements indicated surprisingly high absolute values of the electrokinetic potential at high ionic strengths. Moreover, certain 1-1 electrolytes (lithium salts and certain sodium salts) induced a shift in the IEP of metal oxides to high pH, which indicates specific adsorption of cations. The driving force for adsorption of metal cations on metal oxides at high ionic strengths is at least partly due to ion–ion interactions in solution. However, the difference in high ionic strength behavior between particular metal oxides suggests, that specific interactions between the solid and the ions also play an important role.
The electrokinetic behavior of metal oxides and silica in highly concentrated 1-1 electrolytes is well-documented [3], but there are no data for other materials. We are interested if the surprisingly high electrokinetic potentials at high ionic strength occur also with materials other than sparingly soluble oxides. The aim of this study is to generalize the previous observations, and to verify the hypotheses regarding the mechanism of the observed phenomena. We are especially interested if the salt-specificity, which was observed for metal oxides occurs also for other materials.
Kaolinite and montmorillonite were selected for this study as examples of clay minerals. Both have well-defined chemical formulas and crystalline structures, but actual samples vary in composition. This is because in contact with aqueous electrolytes clay minerals show cation-exchange properties and certain degree of dissolution (or rather selective leaching of components). The shape of the particles is far from spherical, and the charge is not evenly distributed over the surface. Moreover, part of the charge of the particles is located in the bulk. The charge of clay mineral particles consists of negative structural charge, which is rather insensitive to the pH and ionic strength and of variable (pH and ionic strength dependent) charge of the edges. This results in a negative electrophoretic mobility over the entire pH range [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], although a few studies report an IEP at low pH [11], [12]. Probably the electrokinetic behavior is affected by the morphology of the particles (aspect ratio). Strictly speaking, for clay minerals one should use a term “apparent ζ potential” for the value that is calculated from the measured quantity (e.g., electrophoretic mobility) by the instrument software, since the physical sense of this quantity is vague.
Section snippets
Materials
Kaolin (Sigma-Aldrich, particle size 0.1–4 μm, according to the manufacturer) was used as obtained. Montmorillonite was a fine fraction separated from montmorillonite K 10 (Fluka, surface area 200 ± 20 m2/g). The original product contained coarse grains which are not suitable for electrophoretic or electroacoustic measurements. In order to separate a fine fraction, the commercial product was dispersed in water (1:10). After 10 min the dispersion was separated from the sediment, and after further
Kaolin
Electrokinetic curves for kaolin are shown in Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 7 (Malvern), Fig. 8 (Acoustosizer), and Fig. 9 (DT). The results obtained by means of various instruments were qualitatively consistent with very few exceptions. Only negative ζ potentials at a low ionic strength were observed by means of Malvern and DT. A few titrations carried out by means of Acoustosizer (not shown here) suggest an IEP at pH about 3.6. A few publications report similar IEP of
Discussion
The electrokinetic behavior of clay minerals and silica show many common features. The IEP at low ionic strengths falls at pH below 4 or does not exist at all. This is due to common physical properties (relatively low dielectric constant [16]) and to similar character of the surface groups responsible for the surface charging. The preference for the alkali metal cations decreases in the series Cs > Rb > K > Na > Li. In this respect silica and clay minerals can be categorized as “soft” in contrast with
Conclusions
The results obtained by means of three different instruments based on different principles are qualitatively consistent. Thus, the observed phenomena are likely to be real effects rather than instrument artifacts. The present study confirmed that the ζ potentials in 1 M 1-1 electrolyte solutions can assume values in excess of ±20 mV. The shifts in the IEP induced by a 1-1 electrolyte when its concentration exceeds 0.1 M are a common phenomenon. These shifts are salt-specific. For “soft” materials,
References (16)
- et al.
J. Colloid Interf. Sci.
(2006) - et al.
Adv. Colloid Interf. Sci.
(2004) - et al.
J. Colloid Interf. Sci.
(1998) - et al.
Microporous Mesoporous Mater.
(2005) - et al.
Colloids Surf. A
(1998) - et al.
J. Colloid Interf. Sci.
(2003) - et al.
J. Colloid Interf. Sci.
(1996) - et al.
Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta
(2001)
Cited by (59)
A review of zeta potential measurements using electroacoustics
2022, Advances in Colloid and Interface SciencePredictive surface complexation model of the calcite-aqueous solution interface: The impact of high concentration and complex composition of brines
2022, Journal of Colloid and Interface ScienceCitation Excerpt :The EPM is conducted on powdered calcite samples suspended in aqueous solution thus potentially exposing fresh mineral surfaces. Moreover, the method is usually limited to solution concentration below 1 M (M = mol/L) [16]. The ratio of the mineral to the solution is also very low (typically few grams per liter) and not representative of real rocks.
Interactions between bubble and particles of key minerals of diasporic bauxite through the extended DLVO theory
2022, International Journal of Mining Science and TechnologyPathways of biogenically excreted organic matter into soil aggregates
2022, Soil Biology and BiochemistryThe mechanisms of gravity-constrained aggregation in natural colloidal suspensions
2021, Journal of Colloid and Interface SciencePhotocatalytic activity of Nb heterostructure (NaNbO<inf>3</inf>/Na<inf>2</inf>Nb<inf>4</inf>O<inf>11</inf>) and Nb/clay materials in the degradation of organic compounds
2019, Solar EnergyCitation Excerpt :According to the Zeta Potential, the surface of natural clay (Clay_nat) has a negative charge in all the pH intervals studied, the surface charge has very similar values in different pHs, and it is almost constantly above pH 2. This trend was already expected since the montmorillonite usually has a negative surface charge as previously reported (Kosmulski, 2006). On the other hand, comparing the Zeta Potential profile of Clay_nat and Clay_NaCl, it can be clearly seen that the addition of NaCl to the natural clay caused a notable polarization of the surface charge since the profile of Clay_NaCl showed a declined curve in the interval of pH 3–4 (more notably remarked when compared to Clay_nat), which can be related to the presence of Na+ and Cl− ions, on the surface of the sample.