Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
Thermo-mechanical contact problems on non-matching meshes
Introduction
The numerical simulation of frictional contact problems is still a challenging task and plays an important role in many industrial applications. Mortar techniques became a promising discretization method for such type of problems involving non-matching meshes, see, e.g. [9], [21], [3], [5]. Recently, a lot of work has been done to generalize these concepts to dynamic contact problems including friction and large deformations. Due to the sliding of the different bodies, most of the frictional work results in the generation of heat. This observation motivates the extension of the mortar method to thermo-mechanical dynamic contact problems including frictional heating and thermal softening effects at the contact interface.
The mortar method is a hybrid formulation in space. The displacement and the temperature field enter as primal variable, whereas the contact stress and the thermal flux at the contact interface are the dual variables. Mathematically speaking, the dual variables, also denoted as Lagrange multipliers, enforce the interface conditions. Here, we have two types of constraints: the non-penetration condition and the friction law for the mechanical unknowns and the generation of heat as well as the flow condition for the thermal variables. The main focus of this paper is on the treatment of the Robin-type thermal interface condition within the mortar framework. Due to the use of biorthogonal basis functions for the mechanical dual variable, the mechanical interface constraints at the contact zone decouple for each node. Although the mortar approach can be seen as a segment-to-segment formulation, the possible decoupling results in a node-to-segment approach which can be handled more easily from the numerical point of view. In contrast, a straightforward application of the concept of biorthogonality to Robin-type constraints does not decouple the nodes. To benefit from static condensation, we introduce a stable operator which can be interpreted as mass lumping at the interface.
For the formulation of the linear thermo-elastic constitutive equations, we follow [2], [17]. A more general thermo-plasticity formulation is given in [15]. The extension to dynamic thermo-mechanical contact mechanics can be found, e.g. in [10], [13], [12] and is also considered in the textbooks [20], [17]. For the modeling of the contact heat flux, we use the linear model proposed in [13]. More general models can be found in [18]. For the considered formulation with a coefficient of friction depending on the temperature we refer to [13], [12].
We start with the introduction of the constitutive equations and the interface conditions in Section 2. Section 3 presents the time discretization based on the midpoint scheme. The mortar formulation and the space discretization can be found in Section 4, followed by the resulting algebraic formulation in Section 5. Some comments on the applied numerical algorithm to solve the arising non-linear equations are given in Section 6. The last section shows numerical examples both in the two- and three-dimensional setting and illustrates the flexibility of the considered discretization.
Section snippets
Problem formulation for linear thermo-elasticity
We consider two bodies in their reference configuration , with the dimension . The superscript s stands for the slave body and m for the master body, as it is common in the framework of mortar techniques. We are interested in the displacement field and the temperature for , where is the given time interval. The local balance of momentum is given byHere we denote by the mass density of the body and by the
Discretization in time
Both the hyperbolic mechanical equilibrium condition (2.6a) and the parabolic thermal one (2.6b) are discretized using the midpoint scheme which is of order two. We start with introducing some notation. Firstly, we define , where the time step size is given by . Secondly, we denote by and the approximation of the displacement field and the temperature at time , respectively. Setting , the midpoint rule yields
Space discretization and mortar formulation
In this section, the space discretized variational formulation of the time discretized thermodynamic contact problem is derived. Introducing Lagrange multipliers and for the mechanical boundary stress and the thermal heat flux on the possible contact boundary, respectively, we end up with a mortar based formulation. Our main focus is on the treatment of the Robin-type thermal interface conditions (2.17a), (2.17b) which leads to a generalized saddle point formulation. A local static
Algebraic representation
To formulate the algebraic representation of the first two equations in (4.28), we introduce the mass matrices , resulting from the bilinear forms with respect to the nodal basis. To avoid numerical oscillations in space due to the possible non-zero heat flux at the interface, we use a standard lumping technique and replace the mass matrix by a diagonal matrix . We remark that using the lumped version of the mass matrix does not deteriorate the numerical
Numerical algorithm
One of the challenges in the numerical simulation of such type of problems is the design of fast and robust solvers which can handle the non-linearities in the mechanical and thermal interface constraints efficiently. For the highly non-linear mechanical condition we use a semi-smooth Newton method; at the same time, we update the non-linearities of the thermal condition in the iteration process using a fixed point approach. The non-linear mechanical contact constraints (5.4), (5.5), are
Numerical examples
In this section, numerical examples for the proposed formulation and algorithm are presented both in the three- and two-dimensional setting. The numerical implementation is based on the finite element toolbox UG [1] and the fast direct solver package PARDISO [14].
Conclusion
In this paper, we apply mortar techniques with a dual Lagrange multiplier on non-matching meshes to thermo-mechanical contact problems. Discretization methods based on Lagrange multipliers are quite attractive in the case of sliding geometries. The new variables on the interface represent the surface forces and the heat flux and enter in a consistent way into the variational problem. Therefore, these formulations pass a patch test for highly non-matching meshes in contrast to simple node to
References (21)
- et al.
Mortar based frictional contact formulation for higher order interpolations using the moving friction cone
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.
(2006) - et al.
Stable Lagrange multipliers for quadrilateral meshes of curved interfaces in 3D
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.
(2007) - et al.
Numerical methods for unilateral problems in solid mechanics
- et al.
A primal–dual active set strategy for non-linear multibody contact problems
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.
(2005) - et al.
Thermoelastic frictional contact problems: modelling finite element approximation and numerical realization
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.
(1993) - et al.
Comparison of two approaches for the discretization of elastodynamic contact problems
C.R. Akad. Sci. Paris
(2006) - et al.
Associative coupled thermoplasticity at finite strains: formulation numerical analysis and implementation
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.
(1992) - et al.
Contact constraints within coupled thermomechanical analysis – a finite element model
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.
(1994) - et al.
UG – a flexible software toolbox for solving partial differential equations
Comput. Vis. Sci.
(1997) Linear thermoelasticity
Cited by (71)
Insight into the influence of frictional heat on the modal characteristics and interface temperature of frictionally damped turbine blades
2024, Journal of Sound and VibrationA study of the radiation thermal boundary conditions influence in three-dimensional thermomechanical contact problems
2023, Engineering Analysis with Boundary ElementsA numerical assessment of partitioned implicit methods for thermomechanical problems
2023, Computers and StructuresThree-dimensional finite discrete element-based contact heat transfer model considering thermal cracking in continuous–discontinuous media
2022, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and EngineeringCitation Excerpt :A simple thermal pipe-network model is setup to account for thermal conduction between particles. However, these contact heat transfer models cannot consider the contact heat transfer between complex particles and the influence of the shapes of the contact surface on the heat transfer [11–14]. Thermo-mechanical coupling in discontinuous and granular materials is another important topic in numerical methods.
DP-MPM: Domain partitioning material point method for evolving multi-body thermal–mechanical contacts during dynamic fracture and fragmentation
2021, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and EngineeringCitation Excerpt :Hence, capturing both the contact conductance and normal contact pressure are of critical importance for precisely replicating the thermo-mechanical contacts. For simplicity, the linear constitutive law for pressure-dependent thermal conductance has been widely used in the literature (e.g. [57,58]). Meanwhile, Wriggers and Miehe [59] propose a more sophisticated power law to describe contact conductance.
Numerical evaluation of transient solar radiation effect on concrete-faced rockfill dam with dual mortar contact method
2021, Computers and GeotechnicsCitation Excerpt :First, Eq. (2a) is a single physics problem without considering the coupling terms contributed by the stress and deformation of the solid body. The frictional heat may also be significant in finite-deformation thermo-mechanical contact problems (Johansson and Klarbring, 1993; Oancea and Laursen, 1997; Hüeber and Wohlmuth, 2009; Seitz et al., 2018). These coupling terms are omitted here, because the thermo-mechanical analysis conducted in this work focuses on the operating period of CFRDs after nearly sufficient compaction and creep.