Elsevier

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volume 126, Issue 9, September 2015, Pages 1692-1702
Clinical Neurophysiology

Automated analysis of multi-channel EEG in preterm infants

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2014.11.024Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Automatic detection of burst and interburst periods in multi-channel preterm EEG.

  • EEG marked by 3 independent observers, detailed interobserver analysis.

  • Mathematical features of the EEG are calculated and correlated with gestational age.

Abstract

Objective

To develop and validate two automatic methods for the detection of burst and interburst periods in preterm eight-channel electroencephalographs (EEG). To perform a detailed analysis of interobserver agreement on burst and interburst periods and use this as a benchmark for the performance of the automatic methods. To examine mathematical features of the EEG signal and their potential correlation with gestational age.

Methods

Multi-channel EEG from 36 infants, born at less than 30 weeks gestation was utilised, with a 10 min artifact-free epoch selected for each subject. Three independent expert observers annotated all EEG activity bursts in the dataset. Two automatic algorithms for burst/interburst detection were applied to the EEG data and their performances were analysed and compared with interobserver agreement. A total of 12 mathematical features of the EEG signal were calculated and correlated with gestational age.

Results

The mean interobserver agreement was found to be 77% while mean algorithm/observer agreement was 81%. Six of the mathematical features calculated (spectral entropy, Higuchi fractal dimension, spectral edge frequency, variance, extrema median and Hilberts transform amplitude) were found to have significant correlation with gestational age.

Conclusions

Automatic detection of burst/interburst periods has been performed in multi-channel EEG of 36 preterm infants. The algorithm agreement with expert observers is found to be on a par with interobserver agreement. Mathematical features of EEG have been calculated which show significant correlation with gestational age.

Significance

Automatic analysis of preterm multi-channel EEG is possible. The methods described here have the potential to be incorporated into a fully automatic system to quantitatively assess brain maturity from preterm EEG.

Introduction

The survival rate of very preterm infants is increasing (Costeloe et al., 2012) and it is recognised that EEG is an extremely useful and non-invasive tool for monitoring neurological well being and for the prediction of neurological outcome (LeBihannic et al., 2012, Biagioni et al., 1994, Biagioni et al., 1996, Holmes and Lombroso, 1993, Marret et al., 1997, Hayashi-Kurahashi et al., 2012). With recent advances in technology it is now much more feasible to use preterm EEG monitoring for longer periods of time (Schumacher et al., 2011). The very preterm EEG typically exhibits a discontinuous pattern of high voltage bursts of activity interspersed with low voltage periods known as interburst intervals (IBIs). As the infant matures, IBIs become gradually shorter, bursts become longer and by the time the infant reaches full term the EEG has a continuous pattern (Vecchierini et al., 2007). The appropriate length of IBIs at particular gestational ages varies widely according to different reports (Hahn et al., 1989, Biagioni et al., 1994, Selton et al., 2000, Hayakawa et al., 2001, Vecchierini et al., 2003, Vecchierini et al., 2007), however it has been shown that long IBIs (>1 min) are abnormal at any gestational age (Vecchierini et al., 2007).

Neurophysiologists generally assess brain maturity in the preterm EEG by measuring the duration of burst and interburst intervals and assessing age specific patterns. Since the opinion of the neurophysiologist is subjective and only uses selected representative periods of EEG for analysis, this task results in an output which is not reproducible or quantitative. For this reason, some recent studies have investigated automated methods of detecting bursts and IBIs in preterm EEG (Palmu et al., 2010, Jennekens et al., 2011, Koolen et al., 2014). In this way, measurements can be made automatically and virtually instantaneously.

Previous methods of automated burst detection have been developed but have been limited to either single channel recordings or to very small numbers of subjects. Palmu et al. (2010) use data from 18 preterm infants with single channel EEG. Jennekens et al. (2011) use a database of just four infants, and Koolen et al. (2014) just 10, including seven with confounding conditions such as suspected seizures, mild asphyxia or intracranial haemorrhage. Although these studies provided promising results, larger databases are required to determine whether they are reproducible. Furthermore, these studies lack detailed comparisons with multiple observers and interobserver analysis.

The aim of this study was to develop and validate two automatic methods for the detection of bursting patterns in eight-channel preterm EEG. Furthermore, we perform a detailed analysis of inter-observer agreement between three expert observers and use this as a benchmark for the performance of the automatic methods. Finally, we examine mathematical features of the EEG signal and their potential correlation with gestational age.

Section snippets

Material

The data used consists of eight-channel EEG recordings on 36 preterm infants born at less than 30 weeks gestation. Fig. 1 shows the distribution of the subjects across gestational ages.

EEG recording was commenced at a median age of 6 h and 15 min (minimum 3 h, maximum 23 h 11 min). The recordings lasted between 7 h 55 min and 71 h 14 min (median 46 h 57 min). All EEGs were recorded over eight channels as follows: F4–C4, C4–O2, F3–C3, C3–O1, T4–C4, C4–Cz, Cz–C3, C3–T3. Sampling rate was 256 Hz for 32 of the

Burst detection

In this section the results of the burst detection algorithm are shown and a comparison between the ‘fixed threshold’ method and the ‘variable threshold’ method is made.

Fig. 2 shows the performance of the two automatic algorithms based on overlap in regions where observers were unanimous. The first group of boxplots, shown in green, give results for the ‘fixed threshold’ method, using various fixed thresholds, and the second group (in blue) show the results for the ‘variable threshold’ method

Burst detection

In this study, a method for burst detection in multi-channel EEG of 36 preterm infants at less than 30 weeks gestation has been presented. The NLEO operator was utilised to measure activity in the EEG signal and two different methods of thresholding the NLEO output were implemented. In our dataset of 36 preterms we were unable to detect a significant difference between the output of the two methods (fixed threshold or variable threshold on NLEO). A paired t-test on the best fixed-threshold

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre Award (INFANT – 12/RC/2272).

Conflict of interest: None of the authors have potential conflicts of interest to be disclosed.

References (25)

Cited by (31)

  • CARFS<sup>7</sup>: A guide and proforma for reading a preterm neonate's EEG

    2022, Neurophysiologie Clinique
    Citation Excerpt :

    The role of the CARFS7 proforma in prognostication must be evaluated in larger cohorts of preterm babies. Automated analysis of preterm multichannel EEG [47] has the potential to be available in future in clinical practice. Our proforma, with a scoring system for the important EEG components, may provide supportive data to engineers and neuroscientists in their quest for development of efficient, practical automated programs for interpretation and prognostication based on preterm EEGs.

  • A standardised assessment scheme for conventional EEG in preterm infants

    2020, Clinical Neurophysiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    In another study, the authors reported a substantial interobserver agreement when two experts in neonatal EEG reviewed 2-channel continuous EEG with aEEG for seizure detection in term infants, compared to a fair degree of agreement when only using the aEEG (Shah et al., 2008). However, little is known about interobserver agreement in neonatal EEG interpretation in general, particularly for background activity evaluation and for its assessment in preterm infants, for whom only specific features have been studied (Murphy et al., 2015; O'Toole et al., 2017). Murphy et al. calculated interobserver agreement for burst/interburst detection and showed that moderate levels of agreement (median Kappa from 0.53 to 0.66) were achieved among 3 observers with annotations summarizing all channels (Murphy et al., 2015).

  • Automated EEG analysis for neonatal intensive care

    2019, Encyclopedia of Biomedical Engineering
  • It's All About the Brain—Neuromonitoring During Newborn Transition

    2018, Seminars in Pediatric Neurology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Indeed the first ever clinical investigation of an algorithm for neonatal seizure detection, developed using machine learning, has recently completed recruitment in a multicentre study across Europe (The ANSeR study—NCT02431780). Algorithms for automated baseline neonatal EEG interpretation in term and preterm neonates are advancing at a rapid pace and it is likely that a version ready for clinical deployment will soon be available.90-96 It is clear that EEG provides objective information about newborn brain function and technological barriers that previously made it difficult to deploy in the minutes and hours after birth are no longer a concern.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text