ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Clinical Immunology
Volume 120, Issue 1, July 2006, Pages 33-44
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (768 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.clim.2006.03.004    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Role of indirect allo- and autoreactivity in anti-tumor responses induced by recipient leukocyte infusions (RLI) in mixed chimeras prepared with nonmyeloablative conditioning

Marie-Therese Rubio1, a, Guiling Zhaoa, Jennifer Buchlia, Meredith Chittendena and Megan SykesCorresponding Author Contact Information, a, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aTransplantation Biology Research Center, Bone Marrow Transplantation Section, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, MGH-East, Bldg. 149-5102 13th Street, Boston, MA 02129, USA

Received 14 September 2005; 
accepted 11 March 2006. 
Available online 3 May 2006.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

In mixed chimeras prepared with nonmyeloablative conditioning, we previously showed that recipient leukocyte infusions (RLI) induced loss of donor chimerism and anti-tumor responses against the A20 BALB/c B cell lymphoma. We also previously showed that RLI-mediated tumor rejection involved IFN-γ-producing RLI-derived CD8+ cells and non-RLI, recipient-derived CD4 T cells, leading to the generation of anti-tumor cytotoxic cells. However, the mechanisms of such paradoxical anti-tumor responses remained to be clarified. In the present study, we further explored the cellular mechanisms of the anti-tumor effects of RLI in fully MHC-mismatched and haploidentical strain combinations. In both cases, we show that RLI breaks the tolerance of chimeric T cells toward donor antigens, in association with the in vivo expansion of recipient splenic T, B and CD4CD8 cells and the production of IFN-γ. RLI leads to the development of two types of tumor-specific responses. The first is mediated by indirect presentation of donor antigens and occurs independently of tumor injection. The second is observed only in recipients of RLI and tumor and may involve responses to self antigens. Anti-tumor cytotoxicity was mediated by CD8+ or CD4CD8 effector cells. Thus, anti-tumor cytotoxic responses are generated following complex interactions between recipient APCs presenting donor and recipient antigens and host-type CD4+, CD8+ and CD4CD8 cells.

Keywords: Bone marrow transplantation; Recipient lymphocyte infusions; Mixed chimeras; Anti-tumor effects; Cytotoxicity; Proliferative responses; Lymphocytes; Indirect presentation; Alloresponse; Cytotoxic T lymphocyte

Article Outline

Introduction
Materials and methods
Animals
A20 cell line
Bone marrow transplantation
Recipient lymphocyte infusions (RLI)
Flow cytometric assessment of chimerism
Preparation of sonicates
Mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) assay
Cytotoxicity assays
Analysis of the purity of ex-vivo CD4+ and/or CD8+ T cell depleted splenocytes by FCM
ELISA for determination of serum IFN-γ levels
Statistical analysis
Results
RLI induces the in vivo expansion of recipient splenic CD4+,CD8+T, B and CD4CD8 cells
RLI induce the development of anti-donor proliferative and cytotoxic responses, but not anti-tumor proliferative responses
Anti-tumor cytotoxic responses in recipients of RLI and tumor can be induced by A20 and BALB/c sonicates
Anti-tumor cytotoxic effector cells include CD8+ and CD4CD8 cells
In vitro stimulation of recipient splenocytes with donor sonicates induces the generation of specific anti-tumor cytotoxic responses in chimeric recipients of RLI
RLI induces anti-tumor responses against A20 in a haplotype-mismatched strain combination by similar mechanisms as those involved in fully mismatched BMT recipients
Discussion
Acknowledgements
References







Clinical Immunology
Volume 120, Issue 1, July 2006, Pages 33-44
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.