The influence of lens material and lens wear on the removal and viability of Staphylococcus epidermidis
Introduction
CL solutions were first produced in the late 40s and have been developed ever since. These solutions should comprise several functions as to enhance CL wettability, prevent the build-up of deposits and provide effective disinfection against pathogenic microorganisms [1]. Currently, MPS are the most popular CL solutions since they permit in a single step to clean, rinse and disinfect [2]. Disinfection is mainly promoted by the presence of biocides and it is essential to prevent ocular infections, which ultimately can lead to vision impairment. This process may be affected by numerous factors, which include the biocide, the challenging microbe, the material and the presence of organic matter [3], [4], [5], [6]. Due to the presence of surfactants, MPS may also promote bacterial removal; however, according to a previous study it was not significant [7].
Polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) is one of the most popular biocide agents and has been used since the mid 70s in ophthalmic solutions. It is a polymeric cationic surfactant that belongs to the biguanide family and is currently used in several commercially available MPS. PHMB performs by enabling membrane disruption and lysis in bacteria, which results in their death [8], [9].
Several studies have investigated disinfection and bacterial detachment from CLs [7], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. However, since silicone hydrogel CLs were launched, very few works have been performed with this type of material. The present study aimed to evaluate the influence of lens material and lens wear on the detachment capability of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Four silicone hydrogel materials (galyfilcon, balafilcon A, lotrafilcon A, lotrafilcon B) and one HEMA material (etafilcon A) were worn daily, for one month with nightly disinfection with a single multipurpose solution (ReNu Multiplus). In addition, viability and distribution of the remaining adhered bacteria were analysed through epifluorescence microscopy and CLSM, respectively. Matched unworn lenses served as the control.
Section snippets
Contact lenses
The CLs used in this study are detailed in Table 1.
Clinical trial
Thirty-one subjects from both genders enrolled the present study, excluding any lost to follow up. The volunteers were predominantly from the north of Portugal and the average age was 23.6 ± 5.5 years. These were chosen according to the following parameters: they have never worn CLs before (neophytes), they were not taking any medications during the trial, they did not suffer from any kind of ocular allergy and they had no tendency for dry eye
Bacterial detachment
The percentage of removed bacteria is detailed in Table 2. According to statistical analysis, bacterial removal was significant for galyfilcon A and etafilcon A materials. Both unworn galyfilcon A and etafilcon A showed p = 0.029, while worn galyfilcon A and etafilcon A exhibited p = 0.006 and p < 0.001, respectively.
Cell viability
Table 2 also presents the percentage of non-viable cells that remained adhered after the passage of the MPS. This percentage was higher for worn CL, ranging from 23.0% (3.50E5 cells/cm2)
Discussion
The present study investigated the influence of lens material and wear on the removal and viability of adhered S. epidermidis to silicone and conventional hydrogel CL. A single PHBM-based solution was used. S. epidermidis is a pathogen normally associated to device-related infections and thus it was considered an appropriate challenging microorganism [20], [21], [22]. Bacterial disinfection and detachment are two different concepts, but both important from a clinical perspective. While
Acknowledgements
The authors fully acknowledge the financial support of the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) through the project POCTI/FCB/44628/2002 and also the grant BD 19679/2004 (FCT).
References (30)
Biocide and antibiotic resistance: the relevance of laboratory findings to clinical and environmental situations
Infect Dis
(2003)Bacterial adaptation and resistance to antiseptics, disinfectants and preservatives is not a new phenomenon
J Hosp Infect
(2004)- et al.
An investigation into the antimicrobial mechanisms of action of two contact lens biocides using electron microscopy
Contact Lens Anterior Eye
(2005) - et al.
Contribution of regimen steps to disinfection of hydrophilic contact lenses
Contact Lens Anterior Eye
(2004) - et al.
Quantitative analysis of adhesion and biofilm formation on hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces of clinical isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis
Res Microbiol
(2005) Staphylococci in colonization and disease: prospective targets for drugs and vaccines
Curr Opin Microbiol
(2004)Surface energy, topography and adhesion
Int J Adhes Adhes
(2003)- et al.
The influence of surface treatment on hydrophobicity, proteins adsorption, and microbial colonisation of silicone hydrogel contact lenses
Contact Lens Anterior Eye
(2007) - et al.
Soft contact lens solution review. Part 1. Components of modern care regimens
Optom Pract
(2007) Current contact lens care systems
Ophthalmol Clin North Am
(2003)
Antiseptics and disinfectants
Methods Enzymol
Similarities and differences in the responses of microrganisms to biocides
J Antimicrob Chemother
Efficacy of ophthalmic solution to detach adhering Pseudomonas aeruginosa from contact lenses
Cornea
Cationic antiseptics: diversity under a common epithet
J Appl Microbiol
Bacterial target sites for biocide action
J Appl Microbiol Symp Suppl
Cited by (10)
The impact of a rub and rinse regimen on removal of human coronaviruses from contemporary contact lens materials
2022, Contact Lens and Anterior EyeCitation Excerpt :Some studies have shown that the magnitude of microorganisms’ adhesion to CLs varies according to the lens material under test. Adhesion of bacteria and Acanthamoeba to unworn CH has been shown to be significantly lower when compared to adhesion to SH lenses [22,26–29]. Moreover, differences in microorganisms’ adhesion among different SH have also been reported.
Lens material and formulation of multipurpose solutions affects contact lens disinfection
2011, Contact Lens and Anterior EyeCitation Excerpt :Different microbial strains exhibit distinct susceptibilities to biocides [18,19], adhered microbes are more resistance to biocides than in planktonic state [20,21], and exopolysaccharides protect microbes against the biocidal action [21]. The presence or absence of tear film affects disinfection; therefore, worn lenses may exhibit different disinfection scores than unworn ones [22]. Other important feature concerns the biocide uptake.
A novel biocompatible antibacterial product: Nanoliposomes loaded with poly(hexamethylene biguanide chloride)
2017, Journal of Bioactive and Compatible PolymersHandbook of Material Biodegradation, Biodeterioration, and Biostablization: Second Edition
2015, Handbook of Material Biodegradation, Biodeterioration, and Biostablization: Second EditionEffect of daily contact lens cleaning on ocular adverse events during extended wear
2015, Optometry and Vision ScienceContact lenses and keratitis
2012, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde