ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Journal of Chromatography A
Volume 1166, Issues 1-2, 28 September 2007, Pages 171-180
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (871 K)

  E-mail Article   
  Add to my Quick Links   
Bookmark and share in 2collab (opens in new window)
Request permission to reuse this article
  Cited By in Scopus (0)
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
Special issue
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.07.087    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Pressure-adjusted continual flow heart-cutting for the high throughput determination of amphetamine-type stimulant drugs in whole blood by fast multidimensional gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

Teemu GunnarCorresponding Author Contact Information, a, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Charlotta Engbloma and Kari Ariniemia

aNational Public Health Institute, Drug Research Unit, Mannerheimintie 166, 00300 Helsinki, Finland

Received 10 April 2007; 
revised 27 July 2007; 
accepted 31 July 2007. 
Available online 10 August 2007.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Innovative features and technical improvements in modern bench-top quadrupole gas chromatograph–mass spectrometer (GC–MS) have prepared the way for faster and more cost-effective applications while still maintaining sufficient chromatographic resolution, speed of MS data acquisition and reliability of analytical methodology. In this paper, a short wide-bore capillary column with low film thickness (5 m × 0.32 mm i.d., 0.1 μm) was used a pre-fractionating column and only chosen heart-cuts were transferred to the second chromatographic dimension (15 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 μm) by means of a pressure-adjusted continual flow type switching device for quantification of five common amphetamine-type stimulant drugs. The instrumental setting used, in combination with carefully optimized operational fast GC and MS parameters, markedly decreased the retention times of the targeted analytes, e.g., amphetamine 0.891 min and methamphetamine 1.037 min, and the total chromatographic runtime (1.700 min), as well as reducing the need for continuous cleaning of the MS ion source and increasing column life compared with conventional GC–MS approaches. The performance of the instrumental configuration and analytical method was evaluated in validation experiments and the method was also applied to authentic samples. The method demonstrates the potential of fast GC–MS in combination with a gas-phase microfluidic Deans switch device for analysing of (semi)volatile compounds, such as amphetamine-type stimulant (ATS) drugs. This should be particularly useful in modern laboratories aiming at cost-efficient analysis as well as the optimum use of available laboratory capacity and instrumentation.

Keywords: Amphetamines; Whole blood; Multidimensional; Deans switch; Fast gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Experimental
2.1. Chemicals and reagents
2.2. Preparation of solutions
2.3. Sample pre-treatment
2.4. GC–MS analysis
2.4.1. Equipment
2.4.2. Chromatographic conditions
2.4.3. MS detection
2.4.4. Identification and quantitation
2.5. Validation
2.5.1. Selectivity
2.5.2. Linearity
2.5.3. Precision and accuracy
2.5.4. Stability of the processed samples
2.5.5. Limits
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Sample preparation
3.2. The Deans switch
3.3. Other considerations of concerning fast MDGC–MS analysis
3.4. Validation
3.4.1. Selectivity
3.4.2. Linearity
3.4.3. Precision and accuracy
3.4.4. Stability testing, LOQ and S/N at LOQ
3.5. Sample throughput and analysis of real samples
4. Conclusion
References





Journal of Chromatography A
Volume 1166, Issues 1-2, 28 September 2007, Pages 171-180
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.