ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Journal of Chromatography A
Volume 1160, Issues 1-2, 10 August 2007, Pages 64-70
23rd Montreux Symposium on Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Supercritical Fluid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry and Tandem Mass Spectrometry, 23rd Montreux Symposium on Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Supercritical Fluid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry and Tandem Mass Spectrometry
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (266 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
Special issue
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.05.036    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Application of pressurized fluid extraction technique in the gas chromatography–mass spectrometry determination of sterols from marine sediment samples

Donghao Lia, b, Meihua Donga, b, Won Joon Shimb, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Narayanan Kannanb

aAnalysis and Inspection Center, Yanbian University, Park Road 977, Yanji City, Jilin Province, China bSouth Sea Institute, Korea Ocean Research and Development Institute, Jangmok-myon 391, Geoje-shi, Gyungsangnamdo 656-834, South Korea

Received 31 May 2006; 
revised 7 May 2007; 
accepted 9 May 2007. 
Available online 16 May 2007.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

In order to determine steroid compounds in GC/MS an analytical method using pressurized fluid extraction (PFE) was developed. While extracting in-house reference material (coastal sediment) typical recovery in PFE ranged from 80 to 120% (±2.5–14.5) and the average extraction yield in PFE in comparison to conventional soxhlet extraction was 115%. In particular, the PFE showed higher extraction efficiency for C29 and dien sterols. Optimizing parameters such as temperature and pressure is critical in achieving this efficiency. Sterols in the sediment were derivatized with silyl reagent BSTFA in acetone for the final determination. A short column florisil cleanup offered the best separation of the GC/MS sensitive derivatives from co-contaminants. Thirty-three coastal sediment samples were analyzed using PFE and Soxhlet extraction methods. The results on extraction efficiency, silyl derivatization kinetics and purification efficiency demonstrated that PFE is far superior in extracting sterols from sediment samples. It is simple, fast, efficient and amenable for automation.

Keywords: Pressurized fluid extraction (PFE); Soxhlet; Sterols; Sediment; Korea

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Experimental
2.1. Solvents and standards
2.2. Sample preparation and sample collection
2.3. Extraction
2.4. Silyl derivatization and cleanup
2.5. GC/MS analysis
3. Results and discussion
4. Conclusion
Acknowledgements
References








Journal of Chromatography A
Volume 1160, Issues 1-2, 10 August 2007, Pages 64-70
23rd Montreux Symposium on Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Supercritical Fluid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry and Tandem Mass Spectrometry, 23rd Montreux Symposium on Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Supercritical Fluid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry and Tandem Mass Spectrometry
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.