ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Journal of Chromatography A
Volume 1146, Issue 2, 6 April 2007, Pages 216-224
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (446 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
Special issue
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.02.004    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Comparison between monolithic conventional size, microbore and capillary poly(p-methylstyrene-co-1,2-bis(p-vinylphenyl)ethane) high-performance liquid chromatography columns Synthesis, application, long-term stability and reproducibility

Lukas Trojera, Said H. Lubbadb, Clemens P. Bisjaka, Wolfgang Wiedera and Günther K. Bonna, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aInstitute of Analytical Chemistry and Radiochemistry, Leopold-Franzens University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52a, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria bDepartment of Chemistry, Alazhar University-Gaza, P.O. Box 1277, Gaza, Palestine

Received 4 December 2006; 
revised 31 January 2007; 
accepted 2 February 2007. 
Available online 8 February 2007.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Novel monolithic supports (MS/BVPE) were prepared by thermally initiated free radical copolymerisation of p-methylstyrene (MS) and 1,2-bis(p-vinylphenyl)ethane (BVPE). The polymer was synthesised in fused silica capillaries (80 mm × 0.2 mm and 80 mm × 0.53 mm) and in borosilicate glass columns (90 mm × 1.0 mm and 90 mm × 3.0 mm) to yield different HPLC column designs. A comparison of those column dimensions regarding morphology as well as separation efficiency and applicability in bioanalysis is presented. The efficiency towards proteins as well as oligonucleotides was found to be considerably improved with decreasing column I.D. While a 5-protein mixture was baseline separated on all investigated column designs, the separation of small biomolecules like oligonucleotides or peptides on microbore and conventional size glass columns was strongly restricted in terms of resolution due to extensive peak broadening or the occurrence of peak asymmetry. Monolithic MS/BVPE capillary columns up to 0.53 mm I.D., however, proved to be applicable to the fractionation of the whole spectrum of biopolymers, including proteins, peptides, oligonucleotides as well as double-stranded DNA fragments. Due to the fact that reliable chromatography makes great demand on the robustness of the stationary phase, monolithic MS/BVPE capillaries were subjected to a comprehensive reproducibility study including run-to-run as well as batch-to-batch reproducibility.

Keywords: p-Methylstyrene (MS); 1,2-bis(p-Vinylphenyl)ethane (BVPE); Monolith; Proteins; Peptides; Oligonucleotides; dsDNA; High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Experimental
2.1. Chemicals and reagents
2.2. Instrumentation
2.3. Fabrication of poly(p-methylstyrene-co-1,2-bis(p-vinylphenyl)ethane) capillary columns (0.2 mm and 0.53 mm I.D.)
2.4. Fabrication of MS/BVPE borosilicate columns (1.0 mm and 3.0 mm I.D.)
3. Results and discussion
3.1. The effect of the microporogen on the properties of MS/BVPE capillary monoliths
3.2. Comparison of monolithic MS/BVPE conventional size, microbore and capillary columns for biopolymer chromatography
3.3. Reproducibility of monolithic MS/BVPE capillary columns
3.3.1. Run-to-run reproducibility and long-term stability
3.3.2. Batch-to-batch reproducibility
4. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References







 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.