Copyright © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Short communication
Comparison of headspace and direct single-drop microextraction and headspace solid-phase microextraction for the measurement of volatile sulfur compounds in beer and beverage by gas chromatography with flame photometric detection
Received 18 March 2006;
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.
Abstract
Three approaches based on headspace single-drop microextraction (HS-SDME), direct single-drop microextraction (Direct-SDME), and headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME), have been compared for analyzing volatile sulphur compounds (VSCs) in beer and beverage. Procedures and performance of the three methods have been contrasted through the determination of extraction efficiencies, precision, linearity and limits of detection. The overall process of HS-SDME and HS-SPME was applied to GC–FPD determination of five VSCs in beer and beverage.
Keywords: Headspace single-drop microextraction; Direct single-drop microextraction; Headspace solid-phase microextraction; Volatile sulphur compounds; GC–FPD
Article Outline
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Experimental
- 2.1. Reagents and samples
- 2.2. Preparation of samples
- 2.3. Procedures
- 2.3.1. Headspace single-drop microextraction (HS-SDME)
- 2.3.2. Direct single-drop microextraction (Direct-SDME)
- 2.3.3. Headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME)
- 2.4. GC–FPD analysis
- 3. Results and discussion
- 3.1. Method development
- 3.1.1. Headspace single-drop microextraction (HS-SDME)
- 3.1.2. Direct single-drop microextraction (Direct-SDME)
- 3.1.3. Headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME)
- 3.2. Analytical performance of the HS-SDME, Direct-SDME and HS-SPME procedures
- 3.3. Application of the HS-SDME and HS-SPME to beer and beverage samples
- 3.4. Comparison of HS-SDME, Direct-SDME and HS-SPME
- Acknowledgements
- References







E-mail Article
Add to my Quick Links

Cited By in Scopus (7)







