Copyright © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Determination of N-nitroso derivatives of hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX) in soils by pressurized liquid extraction and liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization mass spectrometry
Received 12 November 2005;
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.
Abstract
To aid in the evaluation of the potential toxicity of N-nitroso derivatives of hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX), we describe a pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) followed by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (LC–ESI-MS) method for determination of RDX and its N-nitroso derivatives: hexahydro-1-nitroso-3,5-dinitro-1,3,5-triazine (MNX), hexahydro-1,3-dinitroso-5-nitro-1,3,5-triazine (DNX), and hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitroso-1,3,5-triazine (TNX) in soils. Sandy loam soil was spiked with RDX and its N-nitroso derivatives (MNX, DNX, and TNX). Acetonitrile was used as the PLE extraction solvent at 100 °C and 1500 psi for 15 min. Florisil was used to cleanup extracts following PLE. Instrumental analysis employed LC–ESI-MS, in which 1 mM acetic acid was added to the mobile phase to facilitate formation of acetate adduct ions [M + CH3COO]−. The method detection limits (MDLs) for RDX, MNX, DNX, and TNX were 1.46, 1.46, 1.69, and 1.93 ng/g, respectively. High recovery (91.1–108.3%), good precision (RSD: 3.2–12.4%), and reproducibility were achieved. This method proved effective and was applied to monitor the reductive biotransformation of MNX in soils with the presence of earthworms (Eisenia fetida).
Keywords: Explosives; RDX; MNX; DNX; TNX; N-Nitroso compounds (NOCs); Liquid chromatography (LC); ElectroSpray ionization (ESI); Mass spectrometry (MS); Pressurized liquid extraction (PLE); Soil






E-mail Article
Add to my Quick Links

Cited By in Scopus (11)

20 °C). Maintaining sample extracts at 4 °C decreased loss of test compounds. The method described herein was validated by different analysis teams on different days. Two-way ANOVA indicated that there was no significant difference between analysis teams or days of analysis. The method was successfully employed in the analysis of blood samples from a mouse dosing study involving TNX and RDX.





