ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Children and Youth Services Review
Volume 29, Issue 2, February 2007, Pages 226-246
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (238 K)

  E-mail Article   
  Add to my Quick Links   
Bookmark and share in 2collab (opens in new window)
Request permission to reuse this article
  Cited By in Scopus (0)
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2006.07.006    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

Capturing caregiver data: An examination of kinship care custodial arrangements

Anne L. StrozierCorresponding Author Contact Information, a, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Kerry Krismana

aFlorida Kinship Center, School of Social Work, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Ave., MGY 132, Tampa, FL 33620, United States

Received 3 May 2006; 
revised 20 June 2006; 
accepted 19 July 2006. 
Available online 11 October 2006.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

In order to examine the experiences of both formal and informal kinship caregivers, this study presents data from June 2003 to October 2005 from the Kinship Care Warmline, a statewide emotional support, education, and information and referral telephone line in Florida. This study addresses the following three research questions: (1) What are the demographics and basic needs of a large group of kinship caregivers in a Southern state? (2) Do kinship caregiver and children demographics differ by formal versus informal custody arrangements? (3) Do the needs identified by kinship caregivers differ significantly by formal versus informal custody arrangements?

The following differences were found between formal and informal kinship caregivers: income, relationship to child, child's age, number of children in care, and length of time in care. Both formal and informal kinship caregivers expressed similar needs. Significant differences were found between informal and formal caregivers for the need for more information about available resources and the need for counseling for their children. Both informal and formal caregivers felt particularly strong about the need for more information about resources. This supports the operation of the Kinship Care Warmline for those caregivers in need.

Keywords: Caregiver; Kinship; Children

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Review of policy development
3. Review of research
3.1. National non-probability samples
3.2. National probability samples
3.3. Smaller samples
3.4. Kinship Care Warmline: Overview of services
3.5. Kinship Care Warmline: Data collection
3.6. Research questions
4. Method
4.1. Instruments
4.1.1. Florida Kinship Center Demographic Survey
4.1.2. The Florida Kinship Center Needs Checklist
4.2. Participants
4.3. Procedure
4.4. Analysis
4.4.1. Demographics by formal and informal caregiving
4.4.2. Needs of formal and informal caregivers
5. Results
5.1. Basic demographics
5.2. Demographics by formal and informal kinship caregiving
5.3. Needs by formal and informal caregivers
6. Discussion
6.1. Basic demographics
6.1.1. Age
6.1.2. Race
6.1.3. Length of time in relative care
6.1.4. Income and education
6.2. Demographics by formal and informal kinship caregiving
6.2.1. Income
6.2.2. Relationships to the child
6.2.3. Child age
6.2.4. Number of children in relative care
6.2.5. Length of time in care
6.3. Needs of formal and informal caregivers
7. Limitations
7.1. Sample
7.2. Intervention
8. Future implications
References


 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.