ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Children and Youth Services Review
Volume 26, Issue 7, July 2004, Pages 657-671
Special Issue on Kinship Foster Care
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (126 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.02.001    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Kith and kin care: parental attitudes and resources of foster and relative caregivers

Brenda Jones HardenCorresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, a, Robert B. Clymanb, Dawn K. Kriebelc and Mary E. Lyonsa

a Institute for Child Study, University of Maryland, 3304 Benjamin Building, College Park, MD 20742, USA b Kempe Center, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO, USA c Immaculate College, Immaculata, PA, USA

Available online 18 March 2004.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Children in the custody of local child welfare systems are increasingly placed with relatives, rather than in traditional foster care. Scholars and practitioners have called for an examination of these care environments, as a step toward determining how beneficial they are to children in out of home placement. The present study compared a group of traditional (n=51) and kinship (n=50) foster parents in four domains: (1) parenting attitudes; (2) social resources; (3) economic resources; and (4) health. The caregivers were interviewed in their homes, via a standardized parenting questionnaire and a background questionnaire designed for this study. Kinship care providers endorsed more problematic parental attitudes than traditional foster parents did (i.e. less warmth/respect, more parent-child conflict/anger, more strictness/overprotectiveness). Because kinship parents were found to be older than traditional foster parents in this study, differences between the two groups on parenting attitudes were examined controlling for age. These analyses resulted in non-significant differences between the two groups on parenting. However, even when controlling for age, kinship care providers reported that they have fewer economic and social resources, and poorer health than traditional foster parents reported. These results are considered in terms of the literature on the quality of family contexts and its relation to child outcomes. The implications of these findings for child welfare practice are also discussed.

Author Keywords: Parental attitudes; Caregivers; Kinship

Article Outline

1. Introduction
1.1. Characteristics of kinship and traditional foster families relevant to parenting
1.2. Parenting among kinship and traditional foster care providers
1.3. Rationale and goals for current study
2. Methods
2.1. Participants
2.2. Measures
2.3. Procedure
3. Results
3.1. Group differences between foster and kinship parents
3.1.1. Parental attitudes
3.1.2. Social resources
3.1.3. Economic resources
3.1.4. Health status and service use
3.2. Relations between parenting attitudes and parental characteristics
4. Discussion
4.1. Family characteristics relevant to parenting
4.1.1. Social resources
4.1.2. Economic resources
4.1.3. Health status and service use
4.2. Relations between parenting attitudes and parental characteristics
4.3. Methodological limitations and research directions
4.4. Practice implications
4.5. Concluding remarks
Acknowledgements
References

Children and Youth Services Review
Volume 26, Issue 7, July 2004, Pages 657-671
Special Issue on Kinship Foster Care
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.