Suspension flow in crystallizers with and without hydraulic classification

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2009.08.008Get rights and content

Abstract

The main goal of this paper is to model a multiphase flow of a monodispersed suspensions in various types of crystallizers: Draft Tube Magma (DTM), Double Draft Tube (DDT) and Fluidized bed (FL). To do this, the CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) methods were used. The geometry of model apparatus was similar to those applied in industry. The composition of suspensions and their physical properties were the same as in practical cases.

The computations showed that axial velocity distribution in the investigated types of crystallizers were far from optimal. In each case backward circulation loops have been observed.

Introduction

Concentration distribution of crystals suspension plays an important but diverse role in the crystallizers of DTM, DDT and FL type, e.g. (Synowiec and Tomanek, 1999, Synowiec, 1998, Wójcik and Plewik, 2007, Plewik et al., 2008). Suspension distribution in DTM apparatus indicates good or bad mixing. Intensity of mixing in DDT device determines the degree of suspension flux division between central and outside tubes, whereas in FL apparatus—visualizes hydraulic classification of grains. Development of a reliable method for describing a suspension concentration distribution would permit to optimize the shape of vessel, depending on:

  • minimal power consumption,

  • vortexes and circulation loops elimination,

  • high mixing efficiency (DTM type),

  • hydraulic classification (FL or DDT type),

  • the best localization of the suspension collection point (FL, DTM or DDT type apparatus).

In this paper the results of computer simulations as well as measurements of fluid axial velocity and solid concentration distribution in the discussed crystallizers are presented. For solids suspension flow modeling, the CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) package was used.

Section snippets

Computational model

The crystallizers usually applied in industry are DTM for crystallization of grains smaller than 0.5 mm in size, DDT for obtaining crystals of size 0.5–1.2 mm and FL to get crystals larger than 1 mm. The schemes of these types are shown in Fig. 1.

For these three constructional solutions numerical calculations of the fluid axial velocity distribution and local suspension concentration distribution were performed. They were verified by experimental data obtained from literature (Synowiec, 1998,

Results

Axial velocity distribution plays a different role in DTM, DDT and FL crystallizer. In the first type it should ‘protect’ the particles from settling, guarantee an even solid phase distribution and uniform supersaturation within the whole volume. In DDT it affects the degree of crystals division between central and external pipe, whereas in FL crystallizer it should enable the hydraulic classification of solids.

In Fig. 2 fluid axial velocity distribution in discussed types of apparatus are

Experimental validation of applied models

Data obtained by the CFD method (for standard kɛ method) were verified.

Velocity distributions were determined using Laser Doppler Anemometer (LDA) method (Ruck, 1987). Local axial velocity distributions were read out in three cross-sections of conical–cylindrical tank at the height h equal to 0.06, 0.14 and 0.23, respectively (Fig. 5). Calculations were conducted for the tank of similar geometry to the experimental one. In both cases a constant pumping capacity equal to V˙=3×103m3/s was

Summary

Interactions between crystallizer configuration and local solid concentration in suspension are presented. It is concluded that multiphase computation method is a very useful tool for such analysis. In the case of FL and DDT crystallizers the best was Eulerian model, whereas Mixture model with standard kɛ method was used to describe suspension dynamics in DTM crystallizer.

Computer simulations of described cases were consistent with experimental data, and that validations CFD in places in which

References (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (13)

  • A hybrid compartmental-CFD model to investigate forced circulation crystallizer performance

    2022, Desalination
    Citation Excerpt :

    They utilized Eulerian multiphase equations, and concluded that there were plenty of discrepancies between such a simulation and a single-phase simulation of a crystallizer. Additionally, Plewik et al. [12] simulated the multiphase flow in three crystallizer types of Draft Tube Magma (DTM), Double Draft Tube (DDT), and Fluidized Bed (FD) at geometries corresponding to industrial-scale models. They used the two-fluid and k − ε standard turbulence models, disregarding the simulation of crystallization mechanisms.

  • 3-D CFD-PBM coupled modeling and experimental investigation of struvite precipitation in a batch stirred reactor

    2019, Chemical Engineering Journal
    Citation Excerpt :

    In hydrodynamic-focused models, researchers investigated the hydrodynamic behavior of the crystallizers in general. They focused on reactor configurations and studied the different parameters affecting the hydrodynamic behavior of reactor such as impeller speed, residence time, feed concentration and location, temperature [23–33]. Some studies modeled the thermodynamic aspect of the process using in-house codes or commercial thermodynamic solvers and investigated the thermodynamic parameters affecting struvite precipitation such as struvite solubility, species concentration, pH effect, and saturation state of the solution [34–38].

  • A new model and a design procedure for an Oslo-Krystal cooling crystallizer

    2015, Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
    Citation Excerpt :

    2) The seeds are uniform-sized. ( 3) For simplicity, the liquid phase moves upward through the fluidized bed in plug flow, although some researchers have applied computational fluid dynamics to simulate the fluid velocity profile for a multiphase flow of monodispersed suspensions in a fluidized bed crystallizer [19–21]. ( 4) The crystals in the fluidized bed are perfectly classified. (

  • Fluid-dynamics scale-up problems in the DTM crystallizer

    2012, Chemical Engineering Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    The numerical simulations were performed using commercial package Fluent with standard k–ε method of turbulence modeling. This method was chosen because of its simplicity, low computational power consumption and satisfying accuracy of results and it was validated in number of papers (Al-Rashed et al., 2009, Plewik et al., 2010). The propeller motion was simulated using Multiple Reference Frame method (MRF).

  • Experimental study of forced circulation evaporator in zero discharge desalination process

    2012, Desalination
    Citation Excerpt :

    The most common type is the forced circulation (FC) model. Nowadays many research are held to study the operating parameters of the FC crystallizers [5,7]. As mentioned, zero discharge desalination is the main promising solution for environmental problems which resulted from concentrated brine wastewater of desalination units.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text