doi:10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2007.05.004
Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd All rights reserved.
Microdomains in mixed monolayers of oleanolic and stearic acids: thermodynamic study and BAM observation at the air–water interface and AFM and FTIR analysis of LB monolayers
Ana C.T. Teixeiraa, Anabela C. Fernandesa, Ana R. Garciab, c, Laura M. Ilharcob, Pedro Brogueirad and Amélia M.P.S. Gonçalves da Silvaa,
, 
aCentro de Química Estrutural, Complexo I, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
bCentro de Química Física Molecular, Complexo I, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
cDepartamento de Química, Bioquímica e Farmácia, FCT, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8000 Faro, Portugal
dICEMS, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
Received 12 February 2007;
accepted 4 May 2007.
Available online 17 May 2007.
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must
purchase this article.
Abstract
Monolayers of oleanolic acid (OLA) mixed with stearic acid (SA) were studied at the air–water interface. The surface pressure–area (π–A) isotherms, measured over the whole composition range, and BAM observations were used to investigate the phase behaviour and self-organization of these components in a two-dimensional structure. Pure OLA forms a very compressible monolayer, and BAM observation revealed the coexistence of large and irregular solid domains of different thickness dispersed in a gas matrix, compatible with the two most probable orientations of the OLA molecule at the interface. Mixtures of OLA/SA form condensed monolayers from low surface pressures and the thermodynamic analysis indicates that OLA molecules, in the presence of the long-chain SA, orient with the major axis almost perpendicular to the interface. Langmuir–Blodgett (LB) monolayers of pure SA and mixtures were further characterized by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). AFM images of LB mixed monolayers evidenced microphase separation, not observable by BAM. The SA rich domains are 4–6 Å thicker than those rich in OLA. The FTIR spectra of mixed LB films on CaF2 substrates showed that OLA does not perturb the all-trans conformation of the SA long alkyl chains, up to a mole fraction of 0.4. The carbonyl-stretching band of OLA suggests that the carboxylic groups of neighbour OLA molecules are involved in hydrogen bonds, forming dimers, as in pure solid phase OLA. These interactions seem to prevail over the OLA–water hydrogen bonds.
Keywords: Oleanolic acid; Mixed monolayers; Microphase separation; Molecular arrangement
Fig. 1. Surface pressure–area isotherms of mixed monolayers of SA/OLA at 25 °C, on pure water subphase. Curves are numbered according to the respective OLA molar fraction, as follows: XOLA = 0.1 (curve 1), XOLA = 0.3 (curve 3), and so on; even numbers are omitted for simplicity. Two-dimensional molecular structures of the pure components are included.
Fig. 2. Mean molecular area as a function of XOLA at different surface pressures: 5 mN m−1 (squares), 10 mN m−1 (crosses), and 30 mN m−1 (triangles). The dashed lines represent the ideal behaviour and the solid lines are guidelines of the experimental values.
Fig. 3. Tilted (A) and nearly perpendicular (B) orientations of an oleanolic acid molecule at the air–water interface.
Fig. 4. BAM images of mixed monolayers of the binary system SA/OLA for selected mole fractions: first row, XOLA = 0.0; second row, XOLA = 0.1; third row, XOLA = 0.5; fourth row, XOLA = 1.0 (c = 1 mM); fifth row, XOLA = 1.0 (c = 0.1 mM). First column includes images at π ≈ 0 mN m−1; second column contains images in the range π = 5–20 mN m−1.
Fig. 5. Relative reflectivity and surface pressure as a function of the mean molecular area, at the shutter speed 1/125 s, for pure SA (A), for the mixed monolayer with XOLA = 0.5 (B) and for pure OLA monolayer, formed from the 1 and 0.1 mM spreading solutions, (C) and (D) respectively.
Fig. 6. AFM height top view images of monolayers of pure SA (a), and three selected compositions XOLA = 0.4 (b), XOLA = 0.6 (c), and XOLA = 0.8 (d) deposited, on mica at 5 mN m−1.
Fig. 7. AFM height top view images of monolayers on mica of 0.6 OLA molar fraction composition transferred at two different surface pressures: 5 mN m−1 (a) and 30 mN m−1 (b). The cross-sections of selected profiles are presented aside and typical height levels indicated. Please note that different scales were used for the top view images and cross-sections. The cross-section scale of (b) is larger to allow the visualization of the all profile without saturation.
Fig. 8. Transmission infrared spectra of pure SA and SA/OLA LB monolayers, transferred at π = 30 mN m−1, onto CaF2 substrates. OLA molar fractions as indicated. The top spectrum refers to a film of pure OLA obtained by dipping in a 1 mM OLA solution in chloroform.
Fig. 9. Two-dimensional schematic representations proposed for (A) mixed monolayers with XOLA = 0.4 and 0.6, at high surface pressure, and (B) a pure OLA monolayer at intermediate surface pressures.