ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Chemosphere
Volume 61, Issue 10, December 2005, Pages 1485-1494
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (188 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.04.108    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

Investigation of evaporation and biodegradation of fuel spills in Antarctica I. A chemical approach using GC–FID

Ian Snapea, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Paul McA. Harveya, Susan H. Fergusona, John L. Raynera and Andrew T. Revillb

aHuman Impacts Research, Australian Antarctic Division, Channel Highway, Kingston, Tasmania 7050, Australia bCSIRO Marine Research, Castray Esplanade, Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia

Received 5 October 2004; 
revised 22 April 2005; 
accepted 24 April 2005. 
Available online 28 June 2005.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Little effort has been devoted to differentiating between hydrocarbon losses through evaporation and biodegradation in treatability studies of fuel-contaminated Antarctic soils. When natural attenuation is being considered as a treatment option, it is important to be able to identify the mechanism of hydrocarbon loss and demonstrate that rates of degradation are sufficient to prevent off-site migration. Similarly, where complex thermally enhanced bioremediation schemes involve nutrient addition, water management, air stripping and active heating, it is important to appreciate the relative roles of these mechanisms for cost minimisation. Following the loss of hydrocarbons by documenting changes in total petroleum hydrocarbons offers little insight into the relative contribution of evaporation and biodegradation. We present a methodology here that allows identification and quantification of evaporative losses of diesel range organics at a range of temperatures using successively less volatile compounds as fractionation markers. We also present data that supports the general utility of so-called biodegradation indices for tracking biodegradation progress. We are also able to show that at 4 °C indigenous Antarctic soil bacteria degrade Special Antarctic Blend fuel components in the following order: naphthalene and methyl-napthalenes, light n-alkanes, then progressively heavier n-alkanes; whereas isoprenoids and the unresolved complex mixture are relatively recalcitrant.

Keywords: Fingerprinting; Petroleum hydrocarbons; SAB; Raoult’s law; Antoine’s equation; Pseudomonas spp.

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Fuels used in Antarctica
2.2. A general model for quantifying mass losses by evaporation
2.3. Experimental validation of evaporation model
2.4. GC analysis
2.5. Experimental investigation of biodegradation
3. Results
3.1. Evaporation
3.2. Biodegradation
4. Discussion and conclusions
Acknowledgements
References





Chemosphere
Volume 61, Issue 10, December 2005, Pages 1485-1494
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.