ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Chemosphere
Volume 61, Issue 5, November 2005, Pages 610-622
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (195 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.03.023    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Comparison of a novel passive sampler to standard water-column sampling for organic contaminants associated with wastewater effluents entering a New Jersey stream

D.A. Alvareza, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, P.E. Stackelbergb, J.D. Pettyc, J.N. Huckinsa, E.T. Furlongd, S.D. Zauggd and M.T. Meyere

aUS Geological Survey, CERC, 4200 New Haven Road, Columbia, MO 65201, USA bUS Geological Survey, West Trenton, NJ 08628, USA cUS Geological Survey BRD Central Region Office, Columbia, MO 65211, USA dUS Geological Survey, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225, USA eUS Geological Survey, Lawrence, KS 66049, USA

Received 3 September 2004; 
revised 21 February 2005; 
accepted 11 March 2005. 
Available online 27 April 2005.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Four water samples collected using standard depth and width water-column sampling methodology were compared to an innovative passive, in situ, sampler (the polar organic chemical integrative sampler or POCIS) for the detection of 96 organic wastewater-related contaminants (OWCs) in a stream that receives agricultural, municipal, and industrial wastewaters. Thirty-two OWCs were identified in POCIS extracts whereas 9–24 were identified in individual water-column samples demonstrating the utility of POCIS for identifying contaminants whose occurrence are transient or whose concentrations are below routine analytical detection limits. Overall, 10 OWCs were identified exclusively in the POCIS extracts and only six solely identified in the water-column samples, however, repetitive water samples taken using the standard method during the POCIS deployment period required multiple trips to the sampling site and an increased number of samples to store, process, and analyze. Due to the greater number of OWCs detected in the POCIS extracts as compared to individual water-column samples, the ease of performing a single deployment as compared to collecting and processing multiple water samples, the greater mass of chemical residues sequestered, and the ability to detect chemicals which dissipate quickly, the passive sampling technique offers an efficient and effective alternative for detecting OWCs in our waterways for wastewater contaminants.

Keywords: POCIS; Pharmaceuticals; Wastewater; Agricultural chemicals; Hydrophilic contaminants

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Site selection and sampling
3. Analytical methods
3.1. Recovery of chemical residues from POCIS
3.2. Recovery of chemical residues from water-column samples
3.3. LC/MS analysis for pharmaceuticals in wastewater (Method 1)
3.4. LC/MS analysis for antibiotics in wastewater (Method 2)
3.5. GC/MS analysis for miscellaneous wastewater contaminants (Method 3)
4. Results and discussion
5. Conclusions
References



Chemosphere
Volume 61, Issue 5, November 2005, Pages 610-622
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.