Elsevier

Chemical Geology

Volume 548, 20 August 2020, 119674
Chemical Geology

Fluorite as indicator mineral in iron oxide-copper-gold systems: explaining the IOCG deposit diversity

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119674Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Fluorite-REE signatures are specific to the fluid types involved in IOCG mineralization.

  • REE signatures can be used as proxy for the fluid origins in IOCG deposits.

  • A volcanic lake water-derived fluid is present in Cu ores from Olympic Dam.

  • Global IOCG deposits do not form by a single sequence of processes.

Abstract

Hydrothermal iron oxide-copper-gold (IOCG) ore deposits are globally important sources of Cu and Au. IOCG systems show many common features, but also considerable diversity in terms of geological setting, mineralization style and ore fluid characteristics. The key factors that control ore formation are controversially debated and no general ore deposit model has been able to explain the diversity of IOCG deposits on the global scale. Building on previous work that characterized four distinct fluid types at the Prominent Hill IOCG deposit, South Australia, we have analyzed the rare earth element (REE) composition of fluorite from the Prominent Hill, Olympic Dam and Ernest Henry IOCG deposits and from two prospects close to Prominent Hill. The REE data of fluorite from Prominent Hill show four distinct chondrite-normalized patterns, which reflect the four fluid types identified as metalliferous volcanic lake water derived fluid, magmatic-hydrothermal fluid, sedimentary basin brine, and wall rock-buffered basement brine. Two strikingly similar REE pattern types were found in fluorite from the Olympic Dam deposit and one in an exploratory data from the Ernest Henry deposit, demonstrating the involvement of the same principal fluid types. We therefore conclude that world-class IOCG deposits can form by interaction of host rocks with different characteristic types of ore fluids and their combinations, thus IOCG deposits do not necessarily form by a single sequence of processes.

Introduction

Iron oxide-copper-gold (IOCG) deposits are a globally important but diverse group of hydrothermal ore deposits showing similarities to porphyry Cu-Au, sedimentary Cu and skarn deposits, reflecting variable fluid chemistry, links to intrusions and tectonic settings. Despite considerable research efforts in the last decades, there is no consensus yet on a consistent ore formation model explaining this diversity. Nevertheless, it has become clear that IOCG deposits are always characterized by abundant iron oxides, and that structurally controlled economic Cu-Au ores are hosted by rocks affected by zoned iron oxide-alkali alteration (Fig. 1; Hitzman et al., 1992; Williams et al., 2005; Richards and Mumin, 2013; Barton, 2014; Corriveau et al., 2016).

Current formation models for IOCG deposits suggest that iron oxide-apatite (IOA) deposits may represent the deeper roots of IOCG systems and highlight the importance of ascending magmatic-hydrothermal fluids in creating vertically zoned mineralization (Fig. 1; Sillitoe, 2003; Williams et al., 2005; Knipping et al., 2015a, Knipping et al., 2015b; Corriveau et al., 2016; Reich et al., 2016; Simon et al., 2018). Many studies emphasize the significance of fluid-rock interaction involving at least two fluids of either magmatic, surficial, sedimentary, or metamorphic origin in the formation of world-class IOCG deposits such as Olympic Dam, Prominent Hill and Ernest Henry, whereas this may not be required for forming smaller deposits (Fig. 2; e.g. Oreskes and Einaudi, 1992; Mark et al., 2000; Bastrakov et al., 2007; Williams et al., 2015; Schlegel et al., 2018). Despite the presence of a range of contrasting fluid types, the ultimate sources of fluids, metals and sulfur in many deposits of the IOCG spectrum remain contentious. Therefore, identification of robust tracers of the fluid sources would make it possible to understand which processes and ingredients are critical for formation of world-class IOCG deposits in different provinces, compared to smaller deposits and subeconomic occurrences.

Extensive studies of diverse hydrothermal mineral deposits have shown that the REE patterns of fluorite reflect the composition of the fluid from which it precipitated and permit characterization of the source rocks (Möller et al., 1976; Bau et al., 2003; Schwinn and Markl, 2005). On this basis we have investigated the REE signatures of fluorite in ores from the large Prominent Hill, Olympic Dam, and Ernest Henry IOCG deposits, as well as from the small Triton and Neptune prospects by LA-ICP-MS (Fig. 2). Building on recent advances in characterizing IOCG fluids, the four distinct fluid types identified in the Prominent Hill deposit (Schlegel et al., 2018) were used to calibrate four characteristic REE signatures of fluorite. Each signature is specific to one fluid type involved in IOCG mineralization and can be used as a proxy for the fluid origins in other IOCG deposits. Comparison with published data confirms that interactions between a magmatic-hydrothermal and at least one additional fluid lead to formation of world-class IOCG deposits. Potential fluids involved in IOCG deposit formation include volcanic lake water derived fluids in areas of active volcanism, magmatic-hydrothermal fluids, sedimentary basin brines and rock buffered basement brines including metamorphic fluids.

Section snippets

IOCG fluids and mineralization in the Prominent Hill area

We report only the distinctive characteristics of the Prominent Hill deposit and the Triton and Neptune prospects as a basis to interpret the REE data; further background information for the Prominent Hill, Olympic Dam and Ernest Henry deposits is summarized in Fig. 1 and in the literature (e.g. Oliver et al., 2008; Ehrig et al., 2012; Schlegel and Heinrich, 2015; Schlegel et al., 2017, Schlegel et al., 2018).

The Prominent Hill deposit is located in the footwall of a fault system, which has

Sampling

Forty-seven fluorite bearing samples were collected mostly from drill core and they originate from the Prominent Hill, Olympic Dam and Ernest Henry IOCG deposits as well as the Neptune and Triton prospects near Prominent Hill. The location of each sample including a summary description is given in Table A1 in the Electronic supplementary material, which also contains specific references to Figures from previous studies.

Fifteen of the 19 samples from the Prominent Hill deposit were collected

Petrographic relations in samples across different deposits

Representative mineral textures of samples from each locality are documented in Fig. 3, Fig. 4 and A2–5 (Electronic supplementary material) and show that fluorite is intergrown with Cu-(Fe)-sulfides as an integral part of the mineral assemblage. Careful petrography made it possible to clearly relate fluorite from Prominent Hill to FIA containing one of the four fluid types (Fig. 3A–D). We consider some of the textural differences among the hematite breccias from Olympic Dam and Prominent Hill

Classification of fluorite

The classification of fluorite in this study is strictly based on a combination of their REE patterns and their position in the Tb/La–Tb/Ca diagram (Fig. 5; c.f. Möller et al., 1976). The classification diagram builds up on the earlier works of Schneider et al. (1975), Jacob (1974) and Fleischer (1969) who analyzed the REE data of fluorite from numerous deposits located in Asia, Bulgaria and the United States. The following paragraph summarizes its background information originally published in

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This project was made possible by funding from the German Research Foundation (DFG), grants number WA1526/7-1 and INST222/1235-1. We thank Christoph A. Heinrich for providing samples from the Olympic Dam and Ernest Henry ore deposits and we thank Peter Pollard for his insightful comments and constructive review. We also acknowledge the comments of Adam Simon and Andrew Tomkins on an early version of this paper.

References (68)

  • A. Migdisov et al.

    A spectrophotometric study of neodymium(III) complexation in sulfate solutions at elevated temperatures

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac.

    (2006)
  • A.A. Migdisov et al.

    An experimental study of the solubility and speciation of the Rare Earth Elements (III) in fluoride- and chloride-bearing aqueous solutions at temperatures up to 300 °C

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (2009)
  • A. Migdisov et al.

    Hydrothermal transport, deposition, and fractionation of the REE: experimental data and thermodynamic calculations

    Chem. Geol.

    (2016)
  • N.H.S. Oliver et al.

    The protracted hydrothermal evolution of the Mount Isa Eastern Succession: a review and tectonic implications

    Precambrian Res.

    (2008)
  • T.U. Schlegel et al.

    Accurate and precise quantification of major and trace element compositions of calcic-sodic fluid inclusions by combined microthermometry and LA-ICPMS analysis

    Chem. Geol.

    (2012)
  • T.U. Schlegel et al.

    Magmatic-hydrothermal sulfur source for Prominent Hill and other iron oxide-copper-gold mineralisations in the Olympic IOCG province, South Australia

    Ore Geol. Rev.

    (2017)
  • J. Schönenberger et al.

    REE systematics of fluorides, calcite and siderite in peralkaline plutonic rocks from the Gardar Province, South Greenland

    Chem. Geol.

    (2008)
  • G. Schwinn et al.

    REE systematics in hydrothermal fluorite

    Chem. Geol.

    (2005)
  • M.L.C. Sirbescu et al.

    Analysis of boron in fluid inclusions by microthermometry, laser ablation ICP-MS, and Raman spectroscopy: application to the Cryo-Genie Pegmatite, San Diego County, California, USA

    Chem. Geol.

    (2013)
  • T. Sriwana et al.

    Geochemistry of the acid Kawah Putih lake, Patuha volcano, West Java, Indonesia

    J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res.

    (2000)
  • V. van Hinsberg et al.

    Extreme alteration by hyperacidic brines at Kawah Ijen volcano, East Java, Indonesia: II. Metasomatic imprint and element fluxes

    J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res.

    (2010)
  • M.R. Williams et al.

    Mineralogical and fluid characteristics of the fluorite-rich Monakoff and E1 Cu-Au deposits, Cloncurry region, Queensland, Australia: Implications for regional F-Ba-rich IOCG mineralisation

    Ore Geol. Rev.

    (2015)
  • S.A. Wood

    The aqueous geochemistry of the rare-earth elements and yttrium. 1. Review of available low-temperature data for inorganic complexes and the inorganic REE speciation of natural waters

    Chem. Geol.

    (1990)
  • S.A. Wood

    The aqueous geochemistry of the rare-earth elements and yttrium. 2. Theoretical predictions of speciation in hydrothermal solutions to 350°C at saturation water vapor pressure

    Chem. Geol.

    (1990)
  • O.B. Apukhtina et al.

    Early, deep magnetite-fluorapatite mineralization at the Olympic Dam Cu-U-Au-Ag deposit, South Australia

    Econ. Geol.

    (2017)
  • T. Baker et al.

    Mixed messages in iron oxide-copper-gold systems of the Cloncurry district, Australia: insights from PIXE analysis of halogens and copper in fluid inclusions

    Mineral. Deposita

    (2008)
  • M.D. Barton et al.

    Evaporitic-source model for igneous-related Fe oxide-(REE-Cu-Au-U) mineralization

    Geology

    (1996)
  • E.N. Bastrakov et al.

    Fluid evolution and origins of iron oxide-Cu-Au prospects in the Olympic Dam district, Gawler craton, South Australia

    Econ. Geol.

    (2007)
  • M. Bau et al.

    Rare earth element fractionation in metamorphogenic hydrothermal calcite, magnesite and siderite

    Miner. Petrol.

    (1992)
  • M. Bau et al.

    Tracing element sources of hydrothermal mineral deposits: REE and Y distribution and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes in fluorite from MVT deposits in the Pennine Orefield, England

    Mineral. Deposita

    (2003)
  • M. Chiaradia et al.

    Origin of fluids in iron oxide-copper-gold deposits: constraints from δ37Cl, 87Sr/86Sr and Cl/Br

    Mineral. Deposita

    (2006)
  • L. Corriveau et al.

    Alteration facies linkages among iron oxide copper-gold, iron oxide-apatite, and affiliated deposits in the Great Bear magmatic zone, Northwest Territories, Canada

    Econ. Geol.

    (2016)
  • G.J. Davidson et al.

    Characteristics and origin of the Oak Dam East breccia-hosted, iron oxide Cu-U-(Au) deposit: Olympic Dam region, Gawler craton, South Australia

    Econ. Geol.

    (2007)
  • H.G. Dill et al.

    Variation of color, structure and morphology of fluorite and the origin of the hydrothermal F-Ba deposits at Nabburg-Wölsendorf, SE Germany

    Neues Jb. Mineral. Abh.

    (2010)
  • Cited by (15)

    • Integrated O, Fe, and Ti isotopic analysis elucidates multiple metal and fluid sources for magnetite from the Ernest Henry Iron oxide copper gold (IOCG) Deposit, Queensland, Australia

      2022, Ore Geology Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      These findings imply that evaporitic fluids were likely unimportant for transporting Cu and Au at Ernest Henry. A fluid mixing model supported by our data and that of previous studies involves Cu-Au-bearing magmatic-derived fluids mixing with a basinal brine that may or may not include metamorphic breakdown/devolatilization products (Baker et al., 2008; Schlegel et al., 2020). The spatial variability of Δ’17O remains poorly constrained and further work is needed to fully understand the importance of evaporitic fluids at Ernest Henry.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text