Full length articleFactors influencing the perceived credibility of diet-nutrition information web sites
Introduction
With the advent of new technology, people are now paying more attention to science-based health information (Thomm & Bromme, 2012). In particular, many people are concerned about diet and nutrition information because the United States is in the midst of what the Centers for Disease Control have called an “obesity epidemic” (Centers for Disease Control, 2011). Because obesity can cause life-threatening diseases, it is regarded as a major problem, typically associated with poor dietary habits (Malik, Willett, & Hu, 2013). Controlling one's dietary habits and caloric intake should be the first move to avoid weight gain and lower the risk of developing obesity-related diseases such as diabetes and cancer. However, Crow (2012) has suggested that one reason many Americans are overweight is that they do not understand what constitutes a healthy diet. Thus, people need access to appropriate diet and nutrition information, which could help diminish the obesity epidemic.
In today's society, the Internet plays a significant role in heath information seeking among the public. The Pew Internet and American Life Project survey revealed that, in 2013, 72% of American Internet users had searched for health information online (Fox & Duggan, 2013). These numbers suggest that the convenience of accessing online information supersedes visiting a doctor in terms of satisfying people's desire to obtain information about their health problems. Therefore, the Internet can help users gather health information by providing consumers with useful knowledge about health-related issues (Wang, Wang, Wang, Liang, & Xu, 2012).
However, people are sometimes confused by the information they find online, simply because of the overwhelming volume of data the Internet provides (Goldberg & Sliwa, 2011; Theodosiou & Green, 2003). The volume of information, including often conflicting information, can cause people to wonder whether the information they find online is indeed correct. Consumers' perception of the credibility of online information plays a key role in determining which websites they find useful (Lim & Van Der Heide, 2015). Previous studies have suggested that credibility significant influences users’ perceptions of health-related messages and their behavioral responses to those messages (e.g., Harris et al., 2009, Hu and Sundar, 2010). If health professionals and organizations hope to harness public use of online information as a tool in reducing the rates of overweight and obesity, they need to understand how individuals decide which online information to trust in making decisions about their diet. Although a few studies have investigated participation in online nutrition-related interventions (Colleran & Lovelady, 2012; Robroek, Brouwer, Lindeboom, Oenema, & Burdorf, 2010; Robroek, Lindeboom, & Burdorf, 2012; Thorndike et al., 2012), the relationship of credibility with message features and source cues has not been investigated comprehensively (Hong, 2006). To help fill this gap in online health communication research, this study investigated the impact of two key factors that may influence how people determine the credibility of online health information. Specifically, the present study investigated diet/nutrition information credibility through the lens of the dual-processing models; the purpose was to determine how source expertise and message accuracy affect information credibility in online media platforms.
Section snippets
Literature review
To obtain diet and nutrition information, people can consult many sources, including individual counseling provided by health professionals, mass media, health education materials, and others (Charlton, Brewitt, & Bourne, 2004). Although interpersonal communication—mostly with health professionals, including dietitians, doctors, and nurses—is considered a reliable source to obtain health information (American Dietetic Association, 2008), there are important limitations on delivering health
Method
We investigated the effect of source expertise and message accuracy on perceived web site credibility by employing a 2 × 2 between-participants experimental design. A pretest was performed to verify the manipulations of source and message variations in the web site stimuli. Based on the results from the pretest, the main study was carried out to test the hypotheses.
Manipulation check
To assess the success of the manipulations for accuracy and source expertise, we used t-tests to determine whether participants who read different versions of the message differed in their ratings of source expertise and message accuracy. The t-test findings revealed significant differences in ratings of source expertise (t = 6.95, p < .001) and message accuracy (t = 14.73, p < .001). Consistent with the results of the pretest, participants perceived the CDC (M = 4.92, SD = .99) as being more
Discussion
This study was designed to help us understand key influences on how people perceive the credibility of web sites that provide diet and nutrition information. In particular, the study examined two major variables (i.e., message accuracy and source expertise) that should be related to perceived web site credibility, based on dual-processing models. The study produced some noteworthy findings.
First, message accuracy yielded strong main effects on web site credibility without reference to the level
References (66)
- et al.
Position of the American dietetic association: food and nutrition misinformation
Journal of the American Dietetic Association
(2002) - et al.
Use of MyPyramid Menu Planner for Moms in a weight-loss intervention during lactation
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
(2012) - et al.
The perceived credibility of personal web page information as influenced by the sex of the source
Computers in Human Behavior
(2003) - et al.
Socio-demographic and attitudinal determinants of nutrition knowledge of food shoppers in six European countries
Food Quality and Preference
(2012) Enhancing the motivation, ability and opportunity to process public relations messages
Public Relations Review
(2000)- et al.
Prior knowledge, credibility, and information search
Annals of Tourism Research
(2004) - et al.
Process evaluation of an internet-based resource for weight control: use and views of an obese sample
Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
(2009) - et al.
Whole-grain rye and wheat foods and markers of bowel health in overweight middle-aged men
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
(2003) - et al.
The use of social media in food risk and benefit communication
Trends in Food Science & Technology
(2013) - et al.
Prevention of weight gain following a worksite nutrition and exercise program: a randomized controlled trial
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
(2012)
The effect of health benefit information on consumers health value, attitudes and intentions
Appetite
Social internet sites as a source of public health information
Dermatologic Clinics
Designing media messages about health and nutrition: what strategies are most effective?
Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Nutrition and You: Trends 2008
Use of the internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey
Journal of the American Medical Association
Relationship of internet health information use with patient behavior and self-efficacy: experiences of newly diagnosed cancer patients who contact the National Cancer Institute's cancer information service
Journal of Health Communication
Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message sources
Public Opinion Quarterly
Media credibility reconsidered: synergy effects between on-air and online news
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results
Health Affairs
The obesity epidemic
Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context
Sources and credibility of nutrition information among black urban South African women, with a focus on messages related to obesity
Public Health Nutrition
The Heuristic-Systematic Model in its broader context
Obesity: insensitive issue
Nature
The psychology of attitude
Credibility assessments of online health information: the effects of source expertise and knowledge of content
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
Quality of patient health information on the internet: reviewing a complex and evolving landscape
The Australasian medical journal
Health online 2013
The social life of health information (online health information use)
Measuring the concept of credibility
Journalism Quarterly
Communicating actionable nutrition messages: challenges and opportunities
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
Cited by (48)
Critical Reading of Informational Texts (CRIT) Scaffold: Evaluating the efficacy of an instructional scaffold for reading multiple scientific texts
2023, Contemporary Educational PsychologyOnline health consumer behaviour: What informs user decisions on information quality?
2021, Computers in Human Behavior ReportsCitation Excerpt :The second category of research on quality OHI has focused on user perception and trust of OHI and its sources. Some of these works addressed for instance, factors that influence user perception of OHI quality on diet-nutrition (Jung et al., 2016), relationship between visual design and user perceptions of OHI website credibility (Sbaffi & Rowley, 2017), and user trust judgments of OHI (Lederman et al., 2014; Rowley et al., 2015). The third category on quality OHI research has looked at evaluation criteria, instruments and methodologies used in assessing quality OHI such as Zhang et al. (2015) where a systematic review of evaluation criteria, instruments and methodologies was conducted and in Oroszlányová et al. (2018) where quality of health web documents was predicted using their characteristics.
Dealing with disagreement: The roles of topic familiarity and disagreement explanation in evaluation of conflicting expert claims and sources
2020, Learning and InstructionCitation Excerpt :To address the multidimensionality of topic familiarity, some researchers have estimated topic familiarity by measuring topic knowledge as well as engagement or interest in the topic (e.g., Bråten, McCrudden, Stang, Brante, & Strømsø, 2018). Topic familiarity can affect learners' evaluation strategies (Bråten et al., 2018; Jung, Walsh-Childers, & Kim, 2016; Lucassen, Muilwijk, Noordzij, & Schraagen, 2013; McCrudden et al., 2016). For example, Lucassen et al. (2013) found that when readers evaluate articles on familiar topics they engage more frequently in evaluation of the content based on their topic knowledge than when they evaluate articles on unfamiliar topics.
Associations between conflicting nutrition information, nutrition confusion and backlash among consumers in the UK
2021, Public Health NutritionPerceptions from Member-Consumers of a University Community for Sustainable and Healthy Eating: Evidence from Greece
2024, Sustainability (Switzerland)