Full length article
Factors influencing the perceived credibility of diet-nutrition information web sites

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.044Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Dual-processing models explain the processing of online diet-nutrition information.

  • Message accuracy has a greater effect on website credibility than source expertise.

  • Prior knowledge moderates message and source cue effects on website credibility.

  • Issue involvement matters with web site credibility when the message is accurate.

Abstract

This study investigated the factors that influence the perceived credibility of web sites providing diet and nutrition information. Undergirded by the dual-processing models (i.e., Elaboration Likelihood Model and Heuristic Systematic Model), an online experiment (N = 575) was conducted to examine how perceptions of online diet and nutrition information credibility are influenced by source expertise cues and message accuracy; the effects of prior knowledge and interest in the information also were assessed. Results showed that message accuracy increased perceived credibility of the web site regardless of the level of source expertise. However, source expertise had an important effect on website credibility perceptions among those who exhibited low prior knowledge. Finally, message accuracy had a greater impact on web site credibility among those who were highly involved in the issue compared to those who were less involved. The findings increase our understanding of the factors that impact individuals’ processing of online diet and nutrition information and suggest elements practitioners should consider including to create the most effective online sources for diet and nutrition information.

Introduction

With the advent of new technology, people are now paying more attention to science-based health information (Thomm & Bromme, 2012). In particular, many people are concerned about diet and nutrition information because the United States is in the midst of what the Centers for Disease Control have called an “obesity epidemic” (Centers for Disease Control, 2011). Because obesity can cause life-threatening diseases, it is regarded as a major problem, typically associated with poor dietary habits (Malik, Willett, & Hu, 2013). Controlling one's dietary habits and caloric intake should be the first move to avoid weight gain and lower the risk of developing obesity-related diseases such as diabetes and cancer. However, Crow (2012) has suggested that one reason many Americans are overweight is that they do not understand what constitutes a healthy diet. Thus, people need access to appropriate diet and nutrition information, which could help diminish the obesity epidemic.

In today's society, the Internet plays a significant role in heath information seeking among the public. The Pew Internet and American Life Project survey revealed that, in 2013, 72% of American Internet users had searched for health information online (Fox & Duggan, 2013). These numbers suggest that the convenience of accessing online information supersedes visiting a doctor in terms of satisfying people's desire to obtain information about their health problems. Therefore, the Internet can help users gather health information by providing consumers with useful knowledge about health-related issues (Wang, Wang, Wang, Liang, & Xu, 2012).

However, people are sometimes confused by the information they find online, simply because of the overwhelming volume of data the Internet provides (Goldberg & Sliwa, 2011; Theodosiou & Green, 2003). The volume of information, including often conflicting information, can cause people to wonder whether the information they find online is indeed correct. Consumers' perception of the credibility of online information plays a key role in determining which websites they find useful (Lim & Van Der Heide, 2015). Previous studies have suggested that credibility significant influences users’ perceptions of health-related messages and their behavioral responses to those messages (e.g., Harris et al., 2009, Hu and Sundar, 2010). If health professionals and organizations hope to harness public use of online information as a tool in reducing the rates of overweight and obesity, they need to understand how individuals decide which online information to trust in making decisions about their diet. Although a few studies have investigated participation in online nutrition-related interventions (Colleran & Lovelady, 2012; Robroek, Brouwer, Lindeboom, Oenema, & Burdorf, 2010; Robroek, Lindeboom, & Burdorf, 2012; Thorndike et al., 2012), the relationship of credibility with message features and source cues has not been investigated comprehensively (Hong, 2006). To help fill this gap in online health communication research, this study investigated the impact of two key factors that may influence how people determine the credibility of online health information. Specifically, the present study investigated diet/nutrition information credibility through the lens of the dual-processing models; the purpose was to determine how source expertise and message accuracy affect information credibility in online media platforms.

Section snippets

Literature review

To obtain diet and nutrition information, people can consult many sources, including individual counseling provided by health professionals, mass media, health education materials, and others (Charlton, Brewitt, & Bourne, 2004). Although interpersonal communication—mostly with health professionals, including dietitians, doctors, and nurses—is considered a reliable source to obtain health information (American Dietetic Association, 2008), there are important limitations on delivering health

Method

We investigated the effect of source expertise and message accuracy on perceived web site credibility by employing a 2 × 2 between-participants experimental design. A pretest was performed to verify the manipulations of source and message variations in the web site stimuli. Based on the results from the pretest, the main study was carried out to test the hypotheses.

Manipulation check

To assess the success of the manipulations for accuracy and source expertise, we used t-tests to determine whether participants who read different versions of the message differed in their ratings of source expertise and message accuracy. The t-test findings revealed significant differences in ratings of source expertise (t = 6.95, p < .001) and message accuracy (t = 14.73, p < .001). Consistent with the results of the pretest, participants perceived the CDC (M = 4.92, SD = .99) as being more

Discussion

This study was designed to help us understand key influences on how people perceive the credibility of web sites that provide diet and nutrition information. In particular, the study examined two major variables (i.e., message accuracy and source expertise) that should be related to perceived web site credibility, based on dual-processing models. The study produced some noteworthy findings.

First, message accuracy yielded strong main effects on web site credibility without reference to the level

References (66)

  • A. Tudoran et al.

    The effect of health benefit information on consumers health value, attitudes and intentions

    Appetite

    (2009)
  • K. Vance et al.

    Social internet sites as a source of public health information

    Dermatologic Clinics

    (2009)
  • B.J. Wilson

    Designing media messages about health and nutrition: what strategies are most effective?

    Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior

    (2007)
  • American Dietetic Association

    Nutrition and You: Trends 2008

    (2008)
  • L. Baker et al.

    Use of the internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey

    Journal of the American Medical Association

    (2003)
  • S.B. Bass et al.

    Relationship of internet health information use with patient behavior and self-efficacy: experiences of newly diagnosed cancer patients who contact the National Cancer Institute's cancer information service

    Journal of Health Communication

    (2006)
  • D.K. Berlo et al.

    Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message sources

    Public Opinion Quarterly

    (1970)
  • E.P. Bucy

    Media credibility reconsidered: synergy effects between on-air and online news

    Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly

    (2003)
  • M.B. Buntin et al.

    The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results

    Health Affairs

    (2011)
  • Centers for Disease Control

    The obesity epidemic

    (2011)
  • S. Chaiken

    Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1980)
  • S. Chaiken et al.

    Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context

  • K.E. Charlton et al.

    Sources and credibility of nutrition information among black urban South African women, with a focus on messages related to obesity

    Public Health Nutrition

    (2004)
  • S. Chen et al.

    The Heuristic-Systematic Model in its broader context

  • J.M. Crow

    Obesity: insensitive issue

    Nature

    (2012)
  • A. Eagly et al.

    The psychology of attitude

    (1993)
  • M.,S. Eastin

    Credibility assessments of online health information: the effects of source expertise and knowledge of content

    Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

    (2001)
  • E. Fahy et al.

    Quality of patient health information on the internet: reviewing a complex and evolving landscape

    The Australasian medical journal

    (2014)
  • S. Fox
  • S. Fox et al.

    Health online 2013

    (2013)
  • S. Fox et al.

    The social life of health information (online health information use)

    (2009)
  • C. Gaziano et al.

    Measuring the concept of credibility

    Journalism Quarterly

    (1986)
  • J.P. Goldberg et al.

    Communicating actionable nutrition messages: challenges and opportunities

    Proceedings of the Nutrition Society

    (2011)
  • Cited by (48)

    • Online health consumer behaviour: What informs user decisions on information quality?

      2021, Computers in Human Behavior Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      The second category of research on quality OHI has focused on user perception and trust of OHI and its sources. Some of these works addressed for instance, factors that influence user perception of OHI quality on diet-nutrition (Jung et al., 2016), relationship between visual design and user perceptions of OHI website credibility (Sbaffi & Rowley, 2017), and user trust judgments of OHI (Lederman et al., 2014; Rowley et al., 2015). The third category on quality OHI research has looked at evaluation criteria, instruments and methodologies used in assessing quality OHI such as Zhang et al. (2015) where a systematic review of evaluation criteria, instruments and methodologies was conducted and in Oroszlányová et al. (2018) where quality of health web documents was predicted using their characteristics.

    • Dealing with disagreement: The roles of topic familiarity and disagreement explanation in evaluation of conflicting expert claims and sources

      2020, Learning and Instruction
      Citation Excerpt :

      To address the multidimensionality of topic familiarity, some researchers have estimated topic familiarity by measuring topic knowledge as well as engagement or interest in the topic (e.g., Bråten, McCrudden, Stang, Brante, & Strømsø, 2018). Topic familiarity can affect learners' evaluation strategies (Bråten et al., 2018; Jung, Walsh-Childers, & Kim, 2016; Lucassen, Muilwijk, Noordzij, & Schraagen, 2013; McCrudden et al., 2016). For example, Lucassen et al. (2013) found that when readers evaluate articles on familiar topics they engage more frequently in evaluation of the content based on their topic knowledge than when they evaluate articles on unfamiliar topics.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text