Elsevier

Computers in Human Behavior

Volume 53, December 2015, Pages 486-494
Computers in Human Behavior

Full Length Article
Adolescents’ comments in social media: Why do adolescents receive negative feedback and who is most at risk?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.016Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We investigate which adolescents receive negative peer feedback in social media.

  • Risky online behavior increased the risk of receiving negative feedback.

  • Risky behavior was predicted by higher age, sensation seeking, and family conflict.

  • These characteristics lead to negative feedback through risky online behavior.

  • So, adolescents’ characteristics indirectly predicted receiving negative feedback.

Abstract

Receiving negative peer feedback in social media may have negative consequences for adolescents’ psychosocial development and well-being. Therefore, the first aim of this study was to investigate online behavior (i.e., online social exploration, risky online self-presentation) that predicts receiving negative online peer feedback. The second aim was to examine three types of precursors that may predict this online behavior and, indirectly, negative feedback: (a) developmental (i.e., sex, age), (b) dispositional (i.e., sensation seeking, inhibitory control), and (c) social precursors (i.e., peer problems, family conflict). We collected survey data among 785 Dutch adolescents (10–15 years old). Our results showed that adolescents who engaged in online social exploration and risky online self-presentation more often, were more likely to receive negative peer feedback. Online social exploration was more prevalent among the older adolescents and adolescents characterized by higher sensation seeking and more family conflict. In addition, risky online self-presentation was more prevalent among adolescents high in sensation seeking. Consequently, these adolescents’ online behavior, indirectly, made them more at risk of receiving negative peer feedback in social media.

Introduction

Social acceptance in the peer group and approval by peers and close friends are crucial to the development of adolescents’ self-concept (i.e., their ideas of who they are) and self-esteem (i.e., the evaluations of their self-concept). Especially early and middle adolescence are characterized by an increased focus on the self (Elkind & Bowen, 1979). In this period, adolescents can be extremely preoccupied with how their peers perceive them. As a consequence, they are highly sensitive to feedback from their peers, and especially to negative peer feedback (Thomaes et al., 2010).

A large part of adolescents’ communication with friends and peers takes place through the Internet and, specifically, social media (Madden et al., 2013). Social media give adolescents ample opportunity to learn how to present themselves by adjusting and optimizing their online profiles in a way that elicits positive feedback from their peers (Donoso and Ribbens, 2010, Ellison et al., 2004, Valkenburg and Peter, 2011). In addition, social media are typically designed to stimulate positive feedback on one another’s selves, in particular through comments and likes on messages and photos. It is, therefore, not surprising that most adolescents receive mainly positive feedback on their online profiles (Valkenburg, Peter, & Schouten, 2006), and that this positive feedback stimulates their self-concept and self-esteem (Thomaes et al., 2010, Valkenburg et al., 2006).

Although in social media positive reactions from peers are far more common than negative ones, earlier research has shown that a small number of adolescents, about seven percent, mainly receive negative feedback on their online profiles (e.g., Valkenburg et al., 2006), and that their self-esteem can suffer from receiving negative online peer feedback (Thomaes et al., 2010, Valkenburg et al., 2006). There are several explanations why online feedback may be more harmful than face-to-face feedback. First, the reduced audiovisual cues in online communication may make people feel less inhibited (Walther, 1996) and, therefore, negative feedback can be harsher than in face-to-face communication (Kiesler et al., 1984, Suler, 2004). Second, online feedback is more public than face-to-face feedback (Valkenburg & Peter, 2011). Although adolescents can adjust the privacy settings of their profiles (boyd, 2008), they often have a large group of contacts who can see their profiles (Jacobsen & Forste, 2011), and who can distribute content of these profiles to others who do not have access to the profile (boyd, 2008). This means that online feedback can be seen by more – and possibly more unknown – people than face-to-face feedback. Third, compared to face-to-face feedback, online feedback is more persistent and visible to others long after it has been communicated (boyd, 2008), which may also increase its impact.

Earlier studies give reason to assume that negative online peer feedback in pre- and early adolescence can be at least as detrimental for psychosocial development as offline negative peer feedback (Kiriakidis and Kavoura, 2010, Tokunaga, 2010, Valkenburg et al., 2006). It is, therefore, important to know whether certain online behaviors evoke negative reactions and, if so, who engages in these online behaviors. After all, if we are able to identify these particular adolescents, we will be better able to design prevention and intervention strategies. Therefore, the present study focuses on identifying online behavior related to receiving negative online peer feedback, as well as several characteristics (i.e., demographic, dispositional, and social characteristics) of adolescents who engage in online behavior that may result in negative feedback.

Although previous studies have shown that negative online feedback can have a negative effect on adolescents’ self-concept and self-esteem, to our knowledge, none of these studies have examined the specific processes or causes that may lead to receiving negative feedback. An important first step, therefore, is to investigate how adolescents who frequently receive peer negative feedback from their peers differ in their online behavior from other adolescents. Do adolescents who get negative feedback behave in a less inhibited way? Do they take more risks in their online communication and self-presentation? To answer these questions, the first aim of this study is to investigate which online behaviors predict the frequency of receiving negative feedback in social media (i.e., social network sites).

Social network sites typically encourage adolescents to form a network of friends, for instance by initiating conversations and new social contacts, as well as by showing pictures of themselves in their online profiles. On the one hand, such online activities have been suggested to support crucial goals in adolescence related to social competence and identity development (Valkenburg & Peter, 2011). On the other, the more adolescents reveal about themselves, the more feedback this can generate. Although social initiation and posting of personal pictures can elicit positive reactions from others, the likelihood of receiving negative feedback is higher compared to other “safer” online behavior. Adolescents who engage in these behaviors may, consequently, be more vulnerable to negative consequences (e.g., Berson et al., 2002, Livingstone and Helsper, 2007), such as receiving negative online peer feedback, or being victimized online (Mesch, 2009). In the present study, we, therefore, hypothesize two behaviors as potential predictors of receiving negative feedback: (a) online social exploration and, (b) risky online self-presentation.

Online social exploration refers to exploring new social contacts and initiating conversations through social media. This includes communication with known peers (e.g., asking whether someone wants to do something fun with you) as well as less known or even unknown peers (e.g., commenting on messages of people you do not know very well). Risky online self-presentation can be defined as posting pictures of oneself with a strong focus on sexuality and physical attractiveness. It concerns pictures in which adolescents appear good-looking or sexy (e.g., by posing in a provocative or sexy way, or by being scantily dressed in the picture). Both online social exploration and risky online self-presentation typically involve more risk than activities that can be expected to have more certain – and usually also more positive – outcomes, such as talking to friends or posting relatively neutral pictures of oneself. The current study, therefore, investigates whether adolescents’ online social exploration and risky online self-presentation predict negative feedback from peers. We expect that online social exploration (H1a) and risky online self-presentation (H2b) predict a higher risk of receiving negative online peer feedback.

Previous literature stresses the importance of investigating the role of individual differences when investigating media use and possible media effects (Valkenburg & Peter, 2013). Aside from gender and age, which are frequently investigated as individual difference factors, the Differential Susceptibility to Media Effects Model (DSMM) also points to dispositional factors (e.g., personality) and social factors (e.g., family and peer influence) that make individuals more susceptible to media effects. Based on this theoretical model and previous research, we examine the role of three types of precursors of risky online behavior: (a) demographic (i.e., sex, age), (b) dispositional (i.e., sensation seeking, inhibitory control), and (c) social (i.e., peer problems, family conflict). These precursors are expected to directly influence online social exploration and risky online self-presentation, which, in turn, increase the likelihood of receiving negative peer feedback. The second aim, therefore, is to examine the indirect effects of these three types of precursors on negative online peer feedback.

With respect to demographic precursors of risky online behavior, this study investigates two variables: sex and age.

Boys generally display more risky behavior in everyday life compared to girls (Gullone, Moore, Moss, & Boyd, 2000). They also seem to engage in more online risks than girls, for example through sharing personal information online (Livingstone & Helsper, 2007), engaging in sexual online risk behavior (Baumgartner, Valkenburg, & Peter, 2011), and visiting chat rooms and forums, which typically involve interactions with strangers (Sasson & Mesch, 2014). In addition, boys and men may be more inclined to experiment with the information they post in their online profiles compared to girls and women (Orchard, Fullwood, Galbraith, & Morris, 2014). Experimentation in itself implies trying out new options, of which the outcome (i.e., the positivity or negativity of other’s reactions) is less certain. Such behavior may, in turn, increase the likelihood of receiving negative feedback.

On the other hand, girls may take more risks than boys in their online physical self-presentation, which can also, subsequently, provoke negative reactions from peers. For example, they more often post sexual pictures of themselves than boys (Manago, Graham, Greenfield, & Salimkhan, 2008). This relatively risky way of presenting themselves can prompt negative comments from peers. However, because the empirical evidence on the relationship between sex and risky online behavior is not consistent enough to formulate a hypothesis, we explore the following research question: Do boys or girls have a higher tendency to engage in online social exploration or (RQ1a) and risky online self-presentation (RQ1b), which, in turn, increases the risk of receiving negative online peer feedback?

Early and middle adolescents (12–15 years old) may be more likely to receive negative online feedback than pre- (10–11 years old) and late adolescents (16–18 years old). In early to middle adolescence, there is an increase in risk behavior, which peaks in middle adolescence and decreases in late adolescence (e.g., Steinberg, 2005). Adolescents’ online risk behavior also seems to follow this typical curvilinear risk behavior trajectory (Baumgartner, Sumter, Peter, & Valkenburg, 2012). This suggests that early and, especially, middle adolescents may take more risks in how they communicate and present themselves in social media compared to preadolescents and older adolescents. As a consequence of such experimentation with social behavior, these adolescents may more often receive negative comments from their peers. The sample of the current study includes adolescents from 10 years old (i.e., preadolescents) to 15 years old (i.e., early and middle adolescents). Therefore, we hypothesize that age predicts a higher tendency to engage in online social exploration (H2a) and risky online self-presentation (H2b), which, in turn, increases the risk of receiving negative online peer feedback.

A second type of precursors concerns adolescents’ personality or disposition. Two dispositional factors that may be related to online risky behavior are: (a) adolescents’ tendency to seek sensation in the form of new and exciting experiences (i.e., sensation seeking), and (b) the extent to which they have difficulty inhibiting their impulses (i.e., inhibitory control).

Adolescence is characterized by increased sensation seeking (Arnett, 1994, Steinberg, 2004, Zuckerman et al., 1978). Individual variation in sensation seeking has often been the focus of studies into adolescents’ risk behavior, which have consistently shown that adolescents with a higher tendency to seek sensation are more likely to engage in different types of risk behavior, such as reckless driving, sexual behavior, drug use, and minor criminal behavior (e.g., Arnett, 1996). Similarly, it is likely that adolescents’ tendency to seek sensation extends to their online behavior. Adolescents high in sensation seeking spend more time online (Lin & Tsai, 2002), which increases the likelihood of experiencing online risks (Livingstone & Helsper, 2007). In addition, adolescents with a higher tendency to seek sensation have been shown to take more risks in their online behavior (Baumgartner et al., 2012, Livingstone and Helsper, 2007, Lu, 2008). Consequently, this may increase the risk of receiving negative reactions from peers. We, therefore, hypothesize that adolescents who seek more sensation have a higher tendency to engage in online social exploration (H3a) and risky online self-presentation (H3b) compared to adolescent who seek less sensation, which, in turn, increases the risk of receiving negative online peer feedback.

Adolescents with a deficiency of inhibitory control are less able to suppress behavior that is inappropriate in a particular context (Barkley, 1997, Barkley, 1999). Problems with inhibitory control are uncovered by impulsive behavior (Schachar & Logan, 1990), and have been related to a higher risk of several addictive behaviors (e.g., Nigg et al., 2006, Vitaro et al., 1999). It is likely that adolescents who have difficulty inhibiting their behavior in face-to-face situations also have more problems controlling their behavior in online interactions. Inhibitory control and impulsivity are associated with a higher risk of Internet addiction (e.g., Burnay et al., 2015, Cao et al., 2007, Dong et al., 2010), and may also increase the possibility of experiencing online risks (Livingstone & Helsper, 2007). Inhibition problems may also be related to the inability to inhibit specific online behavior, such as sharing information and actions related to self-presentation, such as posting inappropriate messages or photos. In the same fashion, adolescents with low inhibitory control may more often initiate interactions with relative strangers. Subsequently, such disinhibited and risky online behavior can evoke negative feedback. We, therefore, hypothesize that adolescents with lower inhibitory control have a higher tendency to engage in online social exploration (H4a) and risky online self-presentation (H4b) compared to adolescents with higher inhibitory control, which, in turn, increases the risk of receiving negative online peer feedback.

Two factors in adolescents’ social environment may be predictive of risky online behavior: (a) the extent to which adolescents have problems in their relationships with peers (i.e., peer problems) and the level of conflict within adolescents’ families (i.e., family conflict).

Peer problems can, for instance, include not getting along very well with peers, not having close friends, or even being bullied or tormented by peers. Earlier research has already shown a direct link between lower peer attachment and problematic (i.e., frequent) Internet use (i.e., frequent use; Moreau, Laconi, Delfour, & Chabrol, 2015). In addition, adolescents’ offline negative interactions and experiences with peers may also be reflected online, for example by being socially excluded in social media or by receiving negative reactions on what they share online. This is supported by studies showing that adolescents who are victimized face-to-face are also more likely to be victimized or bullied online (Fredstrom et al., 2011, Wolak et al., 2003, Ybarra et al., 2007). This relationship between offline and online peer relationships also suggests that specific behavioral patterns of adolescents with problematic peer interactions are visible both offline and online. Adolescents with peer problems are more likely to have a relatively dysfunctional way of interacting with peers (Parker & Seal, 1996). As a consequence, they might behave in a more socially awkward way in social media, for example by posting inappropriate pictures or messages, which could evoke negative comments. In addition, they may be less satisfied with their offline social lives, and, therefore, feel more comfortable initiating relationships online (Bessière et al., 2008, Livingstone and Helsper, 2007). We, therefore, hypothesize that adolescents with more peer problems have a higher tendency to engage in online social exploration (H5a) and risky online self-presentation (H5b) compared to adolescents with fewer peer problems, which, in turn, increases the risk of receiving negative online peer feedback.

Preadolescents from high-conflict families have a stronger preference for violent media content (Fikkers et al., 2013, Vandewater et al., 2005). This preference for relatively stimulating media content may also be expressed in more extreme or risky use of online social media, such as risky online self-presentation and initiating contact with strangers, which may lead to receive negative reactions. Furthermore, adolescents from high-conflict families may feel the need to escape from for their stressful family environments. Children and adolescents who experienced communication problems with their parents, as well as those with lower life satisfaction, showed more risky online behavior (Livingstone & Helsper, 2007). We, therefore, expect that adolescents with more family conflict have a higher tendency to engage in online social exploration (H6a) and risky online self-presentation (H6b) compared to adolescents with less family conflict, which, in turn, increases the risk of receiving negative online peer feedback.

Section snippets

Sample and procedure

After we received approval from the sponsoring institution’s Institutional Review Board, a large, private survey research institute in the Netherlands collected survey data from September to November 2012. The research institute recruited 516 families with at least two adolescents between 10 and 15 years old. For families with more than two children between 10 and 15 years old, only two children participated in this study. Families were recruited in urban and rural regions across the Netherlands.

Descriptive statistics

Table 1 shows how often adolescents received negative online peer feedback, and how often they engaged in online social exploration and risky online self-presentation (average rounded scores). The table shows that, on average, 44% of adolescents never received negative online peer feedback, 47% of adolescents reported that this almost never happened, and 8% sometimes received negative feedback. No adolescents reported receiving feedback on average “often” or “very often”. In addition, online

Discussion

The first aim of the current study was to investigate whether certain online behavior (i.e., online social exploration, risky online self-presentation) increases the risk of receiving negative peer feedback in social media. The second aim was to examine who is most at risk by investigating three types of precursors that may predict this online behavior and, indirectly, negative feedback: (a) demographic (i.e., sex, age), (b) dispositional (i.e., sensation seeking, inhibitory control), and (c)

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by a Grant to the third author from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013)/ERC Grant agreement no [AdG09 249488-ENTCHILD].

References (63)

  • A. Moreau et al.

    Psychopathological profiles of adolescent and young adult problematic Facebook users

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2015)
  • J.T. Nigg et al.

    Poor response inhibition as a predictor of problem drinking and illicit drug use in adolescents at risk for alcoholism and other substance use disorders

    Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • H. Sasson et al.

    Parental mediation, peer norms and risky online behavior among adolescents

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2014)
  • L. Steinberg

    Cognitive and affective development in adolescence

    Trends in Cognitive Sciences

    (2005)
  • R.S. Tokunaga

    Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2010)
  • P.M. Valkenburg et al.

    Adolescents’ online communication: An integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks

    Journal of Adolescent Health

    (2011)
  • J. Wolak et al.

    Escaping or connecting? Characteristics of youth who form close online relationships

    Journal of Adolescence

    (2003)
  • M.L. Ybarra et al.

    The co-occurrence of Internet harassment and unwanted sexual solicitation victimization and perpetration: Associations with psychological indicators

    Journal of Adolescent Health

    (2007)
  • R.A. Barkley

    ADHD and the nature of self-control

    (1997)
  • R.A. Barkley

    Response inhibition in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder

    Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews

    (1999)
  • S.E. Baumgartner et al.

    Identifying teens at risk: Developmental pathways of online and offline sexual risk behavior

    Pediatrics

    (2012)
  • S.E. Baumgartner et al.

    The influence of descriptive and injunctive peer norms on adolescents’ risky sexual online behavior

    Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

    (2011)
  • I.R. Berson et al.

    Emerging risks of violence in the digital age

    Journal of School Violence

    (2002)
  • K. Bessière et al.

    Effects of Internet use and social resources on changes in depression

    Information, Communication, and Society

    (2008)
  • L. Bonetti et al.

    The relationship of loneliness and social anxiety with children’s and adolescents’ online communication

    Cyberpsychology Behavior, and Social Networking

    (2010)
  • boyd, d. m. (2008). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D....
  • F. Cao et al.

    The relationship between impulsivity and Internet addition in a sample of Chinese adolescents

    European Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • L. Crescenzi et al.

    Privacy, self-disclosure and self-image of Spanish teenagers on social networking sites. The case of Fotolog

    Communication & Society

    (2013)
  • V. Donoso et al.

    Identity under construction

    Journal of Children and Media

    (2010)
  • D. Elkind et al.

    Imaginary audience behavior in children and adolescents

    Developmental Psychology

    (1979)
  • Ellison, N. B., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. L. (2004). Truth in Advertising?: An exploration of self-presentation and...
  • Cited by (73)

    • Influence of teacher absenteeism and school distance on cognitive skills in Ghana

      2023, International Journal of Educational Development
    • Social media and body image: Modulating effects of social identities and user characteristics

      2022, Body Image
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, additional work has also suggested that compared to other countries (Taiwan, China, and the U.S.) Facebook users in Japan are the least likely to engage in self-disclosure or to have contacts who they do not know offline (Ishii, 2017). These differences may be important, for example, in terms of the effects of feedback received on self-images on social media, as the effects of comments or likes received from those known personally offline may differ from that of individuals who are only interacted with online (Koutamanis et al., 2015). In addition, the content of social media may vary according to cultural context.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text