Applicability of the standard specifications of ASTM C618 for evaluation of natural pozzolans

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.08.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Nowadays, the production of binary cements, containing pozzolans (including silica fume, fly ash, natural pozzolans, etc.), is a global practice. Many countries have ample resources of natural pozzolans, capable of being used in binary cements, which reduce environmental impacts while reaping greater economies of scale. The ASTM C618 standard provides one of the most applicable methods for evaluating natural pozzolans. Some research results show contradictions between performance of pozzolans in concrete and the specifications of ASTM C618, as pozzolans having a high pozzolanic activity according to this method do not always exhibit suitable performance in concrete, however, in the other researches ASTM C618 showed compatibility. This treatment analyses the chemical and physical properties of different natural pozzolans by means of ASTM C618 and complementary tests, viz. methods of EN 196-5, X-ray diffraction (XRD) and environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) studies, insoluble residue content and thermo-gravimetric investigations. Measurements of mechanical and transport properties, for concretes containing various fractions of the pozzolans, were performed for further verification. The results illustrate that the pozzolanic properties, determined via the ASTM C618 standard, show some disparities with the performance of concretes, whereas the EN 196-5 standard agrees well with performance.

Introduction

In recent decades, environmental considerations and energy efficiency requirements have motivated researchers to search for sustainable solutions in development. One of the most polluting industries is cement production, since the production of 1 metric-ton of cement results in the emission of about 1 metric-ton of CO2 [1], [2]. Therefore, the application of blended cements, in lieu of ordinary Portland cement, is rapidly increasing [3].

Contemporary surveys reveal that the majority of European cement production is allocated to blended cements [4]. EN 197-1 [5] designates 27 different cement types, from which 26 are categorized as blended cements. Blended cements consist of different supplementary cementitious materials (SCM), such as fly ash, silica fume, blast furnace slag, limestone and natural pozzolans. Natural pozzolans, owing to their abundance and relatively low costs, present considerable potential for employment in the cement and concrete industries. Additionally, their application generally results in decreases in pollutant emissions and increases in concrete durability properties [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. For a long time the use of natural pozzolans has been mostly restricted to Italy, where considerable reserves of natural pozzolans are found [12]. Nowadays, ample resources of natural pozzolans capable of being used in binary cements can be found in countries such as Italy, China, USA, Chile, Greece, Cameroon, Algeria, France, Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Honduras [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20].

Natural pozzolans are characterized by their pozzolanic activity and performance. Hitherto, several methods for assessment and classification of natural pozzolans have been presented, and debated [21], [22], [23]. From these methods, the requirements of ASTM C618-03 [22], for selecting pozzolans for use in concrete, and the methodology of EN 196-5 [23] for measuring pozzolanic activity of pozzolanic cements, have gained ample application in evaluating pozzolanic activity properties.

The outcomes of some research projects have exhibited some anomalies between these different approaches [24], [25], [26]. The authors investigated and found that ASTM C618 can have significant problems in characterizing natural pozzolans [26]. So, it was decided to make a comprehensive study on pozzolanic activity of different types of natural pozzolans with the different approaches that existed, such as ASTM C618 and the EN 196-5 method, X-ray diffraction (XRD) and environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) studies, determination of insoluble residue content, and thermo-gravimetric investigations. Finally, since the performance of pozzolans in concrete mixtures (i.e. their effects on concrete properties), is ultimately the most representative judgment strategy for pozzolanic activity evaluation, the results were cross-checked with measurements of mechanical and transport properties of concretes with the same pozzolans.

Section snippets

Cement and pozzolans

A single cement type (Type II; ASTM C150 [27]) and four different natural pozzolans, viz. Tehran (T) of Trass type, Abyek (A) of Tuff type, Khash (K) and Pars Pumice (P) of Pumice type, have been incorporated in this research. Table 1 presents the chemical and physical properties of the cement and pozzolans.

Aggregates

The physical and mechanical properties of siliceous coarse and fine aggregates are reported in Table 2.

Evaluation of pozzolans by ASTM C618

ASTM C618 presents chemical and physical requirements and specifications for fly ash

Evaluating pozzolan effects in concrete mixtures

In order to (1) investigate the effects of pozzolans on concrete properties, and (2) verify the preceding findings, concrete mixtures with 15% and 30% pozzolan as cement replacement by mass were compared with control concrete through several tests. Table 7 presents the concretes’ mixture proportions.

Discussion

Based on the ASTM C618 specifications, the pozzolanic activity index is the foremost important criterion for determination of pozzolanic performance. According to Table 3, all the studied natural pozzolans fulfill the requirement of ASTM C618. The observed pozzolanic activity decreases for pozzolans T, A, K and P, inclusively. Besides, the summation of SiO2, Al2O3 and Fe2O3 is more than 80% in all pozzolans, with pozzolan A having the highest amount (86.97%). Predicated on these results, it can

Conclusions

The investigation presented in this paper manifests the following major conclusions:

  • 1.

    The results of determining pozzolanic activity of pozzolans showed that the ASTM C618 standard does not match suitably with the real performance in concrete, perhaps mainly due to its allowing a variable w/b for the control and pozzolanic mortars.

  • 2.

    The strength activity index defined by ASTM C311 is not a suitable indicator for pozzolanic activity. Regarding ASTM C311, the authors recommend that the ratio of

References (33)

  • F. Massazza

    Pozzolanic cements

    Cem Concr Compos

    (1993)
  • N. Kaid et al.

    Durability of concrete containing a natural pozzolan as defined by a performance-based approach

    Construct Build Mater

    (2009)
  • P.K. Mehta

    Concrete technology for sustainable development

    Concr Int

    (1999)
  • B. Uzal et al.

    High-volume natural pozzolan concrete for structural applications

    ACI Mater J

    (2007)
  • The European Cement Association (CEMBUREAU), annual report;...
  • EN 197-1. Cement; part 1: composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements. European Committee...
  • Cited by (122)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text