ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Current Opinion in Chemical Biology
Volume 10, Issue 4, August 2006, Pages 352-356
Next-generation therapeutics
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (104 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
Special issue
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.06.003    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

How good is your screening library?

John J Irwina, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California San Francisco, 1700 4th St, San Francisco, CA 94143-2550, USA

Available online 21 June 2006.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Efficient library design is an ongoing challenge for investigators seeking novel ligands for proteins, whether for drug discovery or chemical biology. Strategies that add neglected chemistry or exclude unproductive compounds are two dominant recent themes, as is a growing awareness of molecular complexity and its implications. The choice of how complex molecules in screening libraries should be often amounts to how big they should be. Small, simple molecules have lower affinities and must be screened at high concentration, but they will also have higher hit rates. Larger compounds, on the other hand, will often more closely resemble final drugs, but because they are more highly functionalized and specific, they will have much lower hit rates. The best general-purpose screening libraries may well be those of intermediate complexity that are free of artifact-causing nuisance compounds.

Article Outline

Introduction
What do we want?
Chemical space: breaking it down
Artifacts are a real nuisance
Anticipate follow up
Fragment-based screening
Inspired by nature?
Should screening libraries contain drugs and drug candidates?
Clustering
Compound acquisition
Conclusions and outlook
Update
References and recommended reading
Acknowledgements
References

Current Opinion in Chemical Biology
Volume 10, Issue 4, August 2006, Pages 352-356
Next-generation therapeutics
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.