Small-scale hydrogen production from propane
Introduction
Hydrogen is important in oil refineries and the chemical industry, and it is becoming attractive as a clean fuel for combustion processes and fuel cells. Conversion of lower alkanes by catalytic partial oxidation at short contact times is one promising route for hydrogen or synthesis gas production.
The short contact time regime obtained using various structured catalysts [1], [2], [3], [4] is particularly suitable for fast oxidation reactions [5], [6], [7], [8]. Several studies devoted to oxidation reactions of light hydrocarbons concluded that Rh is one of the most suitable catalysts for the production of hydrogen [9], [10], [11], especially if performed in a short contact time regime [12], [13], [14], [15], [16].
An essential property required for catalytic systems for production of hydrogen is stability under oxidising conditions. It has been reported that Rh-coated α-Al2O3 foam catalyst did not show activity loss at 1000 °C over several hours [12]. The stability and selectivity to hydrogen of reducible- and irreducible-oxide supported rhodium catalysts was investigated for partial oxidation of methane by Ruckenstein and Wang [17]. It was concluded that irreducible-oxides (MgO, γ-Al2O3, SiO2, Y2O3, La2O3) are suitable supports with high stability due to strong interactions with the rhodium. The strong metal–support interaction between rhodium and alumina support, inhibiting sintering and growth of large of rhodium oxide particles below 900 °C, was also reported by Beck et al. [18]. Rh/Al2O3 was found to have the highest stability of all tested catalysts (Rh, Ru, Pd, Pt, Ni, Co supported on Al2O3) for hydrogen production by steam reforming of 2-propanol at 400 and 500 °C [19].
In our work, Rh-impregnated alumina foams have been tested for catalytic partial oxidation and oxidative steam reforming of propane as potential high-throughput structured catalysts. The main subject of this paper is the stability of the Rh foam catalyst. Furthermore, the structural details of the catalysts and possible changes under the conditions applied have been investigated using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM). Finally, we wish to establish to which degree any structural changes can be directly linked to changes in activity and selectivity.
Section snippets
Experimental
Rh structured catalysts were prepared by impregnation of extruded alumina foams of 84% porosity (Goodfellow) with 99.5% nominal purity. Cylindrical foam pieces (3 mm i.d., 15 mm o.d., 12.7 mm length) were cut and then impregnated in Rh(NO3)3·2H2O solution to obtain a final Rh loading of 0.01wt.%, as estimated by the solution uptake. The impregnated foams were dried at 100 °C for 1 h and calcined in flowing air at 600 °C for 4 h. Reduction was performed in situ at 700 °C for 1 h in a flow of hydrogen
Results and discussion
Conversion of reactants and selectivity to main products during partial oxidation (POX) and oxidative steam reforming (OSR) of propane over the Rh/Al2O3 foam catalyst are shown in Fig. 1A and B, respectively, as a function of furnace temperature. Aspects of temperature, residence time, pressure and contributions from homogeneous reactions are discussed elsewhere [20], but some main conclusions are summarised below. Oxygen and propane conversion increased with temperature, and was complete at 700
Conclusion
Rh-impregnated (0.01 wt.%) Al2O3 foam catalysts are active for both partial oxidation and oxidative steam reforming of propane. The highest selectivity to hydrogen (0.92) relative to propane converted at almost complete propane conversion (0.96) was obtained by oxidative steam reforming at 700 °C. Higher stability and lower selectivity (0.72) of the 0.01wt.% Rh/Al2O3 catalyst was observed for POX than for OSR, indicating that the presence of steam in the reaction mixture is the strongest cause of
Acknowledgement
The financial support from the Research Council of Norway is gratefully acknowledged.
References (20)
Catal. Today
(2001)- et al.
Catal. Today
(1992) - et al.
J. Catal.
(1998) - et al.
Catal. Today
(1998) - et al.
Appl. Catal. A: Gen.
(1999) - et al.
Appl. Catal. A: Gen.
(2004) - et al.
Chem. Eng. J.
(2004) - et al.
J. Catal.
(1994) - et al.
J. Catal.
(1994) - et al.
J. Catal.
(1997)
Cited by (61)
Influence of metal loading and reduction temperature on the performance of mesoporous NiO–MgO–SiO2 catalyst in propane steam reforming
2021, Journal of the Energy InstituteThermochemical hydrogen production using Rh/CeO<inf>2</inf>/γ-Al<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> catalyst by steam reforming of ethanol and water splitting in a packed bed reactor
2021, International Journal of Hydrogen EnergyEffect of burner types and steam injection methods on thermal destruction of waste refrigerants (HFC-134a)
2019, Process Safety and Environmental ProtectionCitation Excerpt :In comparison with the situation when steam is not injected in the incinerator using this burner, the incinerator internal temperature increases with increase in the steam supply until 0.6 kg/h. However, at a stream supply rate above 0.7 kg/h, the temperature at T1-T4, located at the bottom of the incinerator, decreases more when compared to the case when steam is not being supplied. The fact that the combustion chamber temperature increases when the proper amount of steam is supplied to the combustor is because, at 800 °C ∼1,000 °C, a reforming reaction occurs between steam and the incompletely combusted intermediate product, generating H2 and promoting combustion (Shaw, 1974; Syred and Beer, 1974; Silberova et al., 2005; Tsai, 2005). But the reforming reaction that occurs between steam and incomplete combustion products has a limit on the amount of steam.
Thermodynamic equilibrium analysis of combined dry and steam reforming of propane for thermochemical waste-heat recuperation
2017, International Journal of Hydrogen EnergySpectroscopic characterization and catalytic activity of Rh supported on CeO<inf>2</inf>-modified Al<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> for low-temperature steam reforming of propane
2016, Catalysis TodayCitation Excerpt :In addition, a highly active and stable catalyst is desired for more efficient reforming at low temperatures. Rhodium has been found to be one of the most suitable metals for steam reforming [7,8], and irreducible-oxides (γ-Al2O3, MgO, etc.) are found to be suitable supports with high stability due to strong interactions with rhodium [9]. The addition of ceria can usually improve the activity and carbon resistance of reforming catalysts [10–13].
- 1
Tel.: +47 735 94151; fax: +47 735 94080.