doi:10.1016/j.carres.2007.02.029
Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.
Octa-O-propanoyl-β-maltose: crystal structure, acyl stacking, related structures, and conformational analysis
aSouthern Regional Research Center, US Department of Agriculture, 1100 Robert E. Lee Blvd., New Orleans, LA 70124, United States
bDepartment of Chemistry, University of New Orleans, LA 70148, United States
Received 9 November 2006;
revised 21 February 2007;
accepted 22 February 2007.
Available online 1 March 2007.
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must
purchase this article.
Abstract
The crystal structure of β-maltose octapropanoate (1) was solved to improve understanding of di-, oligo-, and polysaccharide conformations. The O6 and O6′ atoms are in gg and gt orientations, respectively. Extrapolation of the coordinates of the non-reducing residue and observed linkage bond and torsion angles of 1
yields a left-handed helix similar to amylose triacetate I. The
and ψ values of 1 are also similar to those of other crystalline, acylated maltose compounds as well as some hydroxyl-bearing molecules. Acylated maltose moieties are often stabilized by stacking of the carbonyl groups and α-carbons on O3 and O2′ as well as by the exo-anomeric effect. The conformation of 1 is within the 1-kcal/mol contour on a hybrid energy map built with a dielectric constant of 7.5, but corresponds to higher energies on maps made with lower dielectric constants. In one region of
,ψ space, both hydroxyl-bearing and derivatized maltose moieties are found but no inter-residue, intramolecular hydrogen-bonding occurs. In another region, only hydroxyl-bearing molecules crystallize and O2′
O3 hydrogen bonds are always found. In agreement with the energy surfaces, amylose helices extrapolated from available linkage geometries were almost all left-handed.
Graphical abstract
Keywords: Carbohydrate; Conformation; Hybrid; Molecular; Quantum mechanics; Starch; Propionate
Figure 1. Thermal ellipsoids and atom numbering for maltose octapropanoate. The ellipsoids indicate the regions within which the probability of finding the nuclei is 50%.
Figure 2. B3LYP/6-31+G(d) and B3LYP/6-311+G(d) energies for various orientations of an ‘anomeric’ acetate group on tetrahydropyran in an equatorial disposition. Both observed orientations in 1 and 2 with H1–C1–O1–C7 = 2.5° and 46.4°, respectively, have low energies.
Figure 3. The experimental geometry of maltose octapropanoate, showing just the two rings, the propanoyl groups located on C3 and C2′, and the distances between several pairs of atoms. The short distances indicate attraction between the propanoyl groups despite a fairly long distance between O3 and O2′.
Figure 4. Experimental (a) C–C and (b) C–O bond lengths from 1 (esterified), averaged with data from glucose pentaacetates and β-maltosylnitromethane heptaacetate, compared with results from B3LYP/6-311+G(d) calculations. Also shown are bond lengths for the native (hydroxyl-bearing) glucose and maltose molecules. All C–C bonds found in the native molecules were included, while C–O bonds were from those attached to the 1, 2, 3, 6, and 2′, 3′, 4′, and 6′ carbons. The diagonal line shows the ideal, on which all points would fall if there were no differences among the structures or computational methods. The shortest bond lengths in each set in (b) are for the C1–O1 bond in the β-configuration.
Figure 5. Crystal packing in 1 (see text). (a) Projection onto the b–c plane with the unit cell shown. C6 and C6′ groups are indicated on one molecule to show their proximity to the intersection of the channels. (b) Left: close-up view of b–c projection showing the position of the 21 screw-axis. Two molecules of 1 are shown. Right: Projection onto the a–b plane, with four molecules of 1 shown as well as the screw-axis symbol.
Figure 7. Hybrid (see text) potential energy surfaces for maltose. The
represents the linkage conformation observed in 1 and all other conformations from Figure 6 are shown by dots. (a) Dielectric constant set to 1.5. (b) Dielectric constant set to 3.5. (c) Dielectric constant set to 7.5. Contours above 20 kcal/mol are not shown; other contours (9, 11–14, 16–19) are omitted to avoid clutter.
Figure 8. An n–h map for amylose, showing the conformations for the various extrapolated amylose helices. The extrapolated n–h point for 1 is indicated by the
. The vertical dashed line separates left- and right-handed structures. Structures with h = 0 or with n = 2 are neither right- nor left-handed.
Table 1.
Crystal data and structure refinement for maltose octapropanoate

Table 2.
Intermolecular dipole–dipole interactions (>0.12 kcal/mol) for an mm4-optimized model based on two methyl acetate molecules, numbered according to 1 (dielectric constant of 1.5)

Table 3.
Stacking distances for carbonyl groups in crystals and methyl acetate dimer models

Table 4.
Refcodes and chemical names for compounds related to maltose octapropanoate
