ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Cancer Letters
Volume 261, Issue 1, 8 March 2008, Pages 74-83
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (467 K)

  E-mail Article   
  Add to my Quick Links   
Bookmark and share in 2collab (opens in new window)
Request permission to reuse this article
  Cited By in Scopus (0)
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2007.11.015    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd All rights reserved.

Androgen manipulation alters oxidative DNA adduct levels in androgen-sensitive prostate cancer cells grown in vitro and in vivo

Sanjeev Pathaka, b, Rajinder Singha, Richard D. Verschoylea, Peter Greavesa, Peter B. Farmera, William P. Stewarda, J. Kilian Mellonb, Andreas J. Geschera and Ricky A. Sharmaa, c, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aCancer Biomarkers and Prevention Group, Department of Cancer Studies and Molecular Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK bUrology Research Group, Department of Cancer Studies and Molecular Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK cRadiation Oncology & Biology, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ, UK

Received 20 August 2007; 
revised 3 November 2007; 
accepted 5 November 2007. 
Available online 21 December 2007.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) may cause oxidative DNA damage, resulting in the formation of adducts such as 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-oxo-dG) and the cyclic pyrimidopurinone N-1, N2 malondialdehyde-2′-deoxyguanosine (M1dG). These adducts have been associated with carcinogenesis, genomic instability and clonal evolution. We tested two hypotheses in human prostate cancer cells grown in vitro and in a xenograft model: (1) treatment of androgen-sensitive cells with DHT increases levels of oxidative DNA adduct levels; (2) flutamide, a competitive androgen receptor antagonist, prevents DHT-induced changes. Levels of M1dG and 8-oxo-dG adducts were determined by immunoslot blot and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. M1dG and 8-oxo-dG levels were significantly higher than control levels in LNCaP cells exposed to supra-physiological concentrations (25–100 nM) of DHT (both P < 0.05 by ANOVA). Flutamide pre-treatment completely prevented this increase. In the xenograft model, tumour levels of M1dG were decreased by 46% (P = 0.001 by Mann–Whitney Test) in flutamide-treated animals compared to controls. The changes demonstrated suggest that oxidative DNA adducts may serve as biomarkers of the efficacy of androgen manipulation in chemoprevention trials.

Keywords:Carcinogenesis; Testosterone; Flutamide; DNA damage

Abbreviations: AR, androgen receptor; DHT, dihydrotestosterone; MDA, malondialdehyde; ROS, reactive oxygen species; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography; ig, intragastric; M1dG, cyclic pyrimidopurinone N-1, N2 malondialdehyde-2′-deoxyguanosine; 8-oxo-dG, 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2′-deoxyguanosine; LC–MS/MS, liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry; PSA, prostate specific antigen

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Cells and incubations
2.2. Animals and treatments
2.3. Histopathology
2.4. Measurement of PSA, M1dG and 8-oxo-dG DNA adduct levels
2.5. Statistical analysis
3. Results
3.1. Oxidative DNA adduct levels in cells in vitro and effects of exposure to flutamide
3.2. Effect of flutamide on LNCaP tumour growth, serum PSA and oxidative DNA adduct levels in vivo
4. Discussion
Acknowledgements
References







Cancer Letters
Volume 261, Issue 1, 8 March 2008, Pages 74-83
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.