Elsevier

Calphad

Volume 74, September 2021, 102288
Calphad

Thermodynamic modelling of the Al–Co–Fe system

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2021.102288Get rights and content

Abstract

In the present work, the Al–Co–Fe ternary system is thermodynamically modelled using the Calphad method. Experimental data such as liquidus, tie lines, phase boundaries, magnetic transition and order–disorder data points are included and critically examined. The data that has a better quality has been chosen to optimize the system. An order–disorder model has been used to describe the bcc and B2 phases. Experimental bcc/B2 transition data points were carefully examined and inconsistent data points were weighted less. A four-stage optimization was employed to fit the magnetic and bcc/B2 transitions and phase boundaries. The thermodynamic models of Al5Fe2, Al5Co2, Al2Fe, and Al9Co2 are adjusted to include the third element to reflect the solubility of this element in the ternary system. Ternary interaction parameters for bcc and fcc were optimized, using all the relevant experimental data in the literature. The calculation of isothermal and vertical sections are performed using the optimized model parameters and compared with the experimental data. A comparison between modelling and experimental measurements showed a good agreement between the present results and experiments.

Introduction

The Al–Co–Fe ternary system is one of the systems that describes Fe- and Ni-based superalloys, and high-entropy alloys. Al–Co–Fe has been extensively studied. In this ternary system, B2 as an ordered structure of disordered bcc phase dominates the centre of the phase diagram and extends from the AlCo to AlFe side with a miscibility gap from low to medium temperature. The disordered bcc solid solution is stable in the Fe-rich side, where it has bcc/B2 and magnetic transitions. Fcc is located in the Co-rich side of the phase diagram and propagates toward the Fe-rich side in medium temperature with a limited solubility range of Al. The solubility of hcp in the ternary phase diagram has not been investigated but is assumed to be very limited in the Co-rich side at low temperature. All the intermetallic phases are located in the Al-rich part. In this region, M-Al13(Co,Fe)4 is stable from Al–Co to Al–Fe binary. Al5Co2 extends in the ternary system toward Al–Fe binary. Al9Co2, Al5Fe2, and Al2Fe have a restricted range of solubility of the third element. All the intermetallic phases have a very limited homogeneity range of Al in the ternary system. It should be noted that Al5Co2 and Al5Fe2 have different types of crystallographic structure (see Table 1). The propagation of Al8Fe5 in the ternary system is unknown. Other intermetallic phases have no solubility in the ternary system.

Al–Co–Fe has been experimentally studied by Köster [1], Edwards [2], Raynor and Waldron [3], Miyazaki et al. [4], Ackermann [5], Kozakai and Miyazaki [6], Kozakai et al. [7], Kamiya et al. [8], Grushko et al. [9], and very recently by Zhu et al. [10]. Ostrowska and Cacciamani [11] have published a Calphad assessment of this ternary system.

In a recent assessment of the Al–Co–Mn system [12], we modified the bcc and B2 phases in the binary Al–Co system in order to improve the fit of the bcc/B2 second-order transition in the ternary system. If this modified Al–Co assessment is used together with the Al–Co–Fe assessment from Ostrowska and Cacciamani [11], the ternary phase diagram is not reproduced. The new experimental data from Zhu et al. [12], which were not available to Ostrowska and Cacciamani [11], are in good agreement with previous data, but additional data for bcc-fcc equilibria for Fe-rich compositions at 1000, 1100 and 1200 °C, show that the calculated Al solubility in fcc from Ostrowska and Cacciamani [11] is too low, in particular at 900 °C. Furthermore, they used rather large ternary interaction parameters and, in particular, the bcc interaction has a large temperature dependence. With this they could get a reasonably good representation of experimental data, both at relatively low temperature (650 °C) and at higher temperature, but extrapolations to higher order systems could be problematic. The bcc/B2 transition is second-order at 800 °C and above, but in Ostrowska and Cacciamani [11] it is shown as first-order to a considerable extent up to 1000 °C. For these reasons we decided to make a complete new assessment of the Al–Co–Fe system using all available experimental data.

Section snippets

Review of the literature

Table 1 illustrates the crystallographic information on all phases in the Al–Co–Fe ternary system and all binary subsystems together with their thermodynamic models.

Thermodynamic models

The thermodynamic description of pure elements are taken from Dinsdale [30] in the present work. Compound energy formalism that is explained by Hillert [31] is employed to express the Gibbs energy of the phases of the Al–Co–Fe ternary system.

Optimization of parameters

Parrot module of Thermo-Calc [37] was used to perform the optimization of the thermodynamic parameters. The first step of the optimization is to collect all the binary subsystems and do all the necessary changes to make a consistent ternary database. Afterwards the extension of the sublattice models that is described in Section 3 was done by comparing the extrapolation from all the binary subsystems with the available data in the literature. Based on this comparison, the effective parameters

Results and discussion

Table 2 demonstrates all the parameters that have been used in this work including the optimized parameters. The optimized magnetic transition in bcc and B2 using data points from Köster [1], Miyazaki et al. [4], and Jacobs [38] is shown in Fig. 4. No experimental work distinguished magnetic ordering of B2 and bcc. Thus, the selection of B2 and bcc magnetic transitions was based on some trial and error and also the phase region which was in agreement with the experimental observations.

Conclusions

  • (1)

    The magnetic ordering parameters were independently optimized using magnetic transition data points from the literature.

  • (2)

    The necessary interaction parameters were introduced and optimized separately using relevant experimental data points from the literature.

  • (3)

    Various isothermal and vertical sections were calculated and compared with the literature. The comparison showed a reasonable agreement between the calculation and experimental data.

  • (4)

    In comparison to the last Calphad assessment, a better

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgement

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Germany within the collaborative research SPP-CCA (HA5382/6-1, project-ID 388166069).

References (41)

Cited by (4)

  • Crystal chemistry and thermodynamic modelling of the Al<inf>13</inf>(Fe,TM)<inf>4</inf> solid solutions (TM = Co, Cr, Ni, Pt)

    2022, Journal of Alloys and Compounds
    Citation Excerpt :

    According to all these observations and results, SL models that include structural vacancies are not recommended for the thermodynamic modelling of the Al13(Fe,TM)4 solid solution. This is in contrast with the CEF model developed by Sundman et al. [22] which has been extensively used in the past years [22,62–67]. As a final remark, it should be noted that in most cases, the solubility of an element in the Al13Fe4 binary compound usually involves substitutions on the Fe sites.

View full text