Representation of a velocity model with implicitly embedded interface information
Introduction
The velocity of seismic wave propagation in the medium of underground formations can provide valuable information regarding the subsurface structure and lithology. Therefore, acquiring accurate velocity models becomes one of the central issues of geophysics. In geophysical forward and inverse applications, the parametric form of the velocity model lays an important foundation, and can significantly affect either the process or the results. Many parameterizations of velocity models have been proposed for different applications. These parameterizations can be roughly divided into two groups: velocity models without and with a particular description of velocity discontinuities.
The striking feature of the first group is that velocity changes slowly and smoothly without sharp variations. The widely adopted strategy is to parameterize the velocity model in cells (or grids), including regular and irregular parameterizations. The most attractive characteristics of regular parameterizations are their simple concept and easy formulation. Cells with constant velocity or grid nodes with some interpolation functions are broadly employed forms. Facilitations to forward and inverse solvers have made regular parameters very popular. However, a uniform grid size of regular parameterizations greatly constrains the ability of the model to recover the length scale of velocity anomalies. Although the expression of velocity heterogeneity can be maximized by reducing the grid size (the extreme case being that the size selected is the minimum velocity structure wavelength), the resulting model size is usually computationally prohibitive. The largest advantage of irregular parameters is that they can offer mesh size with variable scale, and thus overcome the inherent disadvantages of the regular ones. Irregular parameters are usually applied to fit the irregularity of data distributions, such as irregular observation geometry or uneven ray coverage, to maximize the amount of information extracted from data. In spite of the strong ability to describe different scales of velocity information, the implementation of irregular parameters would result in many problems, such as computational inefficiency and complicated computational algorithms for building, storing and searching.
Models in the second group are usually used to describe relatively complicated velocity distributions with drastic changes of values. A typical form is the layer model, which usually depicts the model region by several horizontally stratified layers. Forward and inverse applications based on such models are not rare (Zelt and Smith, 1992, Guiziou et al., 1996, Rawlinson et al., 2001). However, the ability of layer models to describe more complicated structures is not enough; instead, blocky models can perform well. A blocky model describes an earth volume as an aggregate of irregularly shaped sub-volumes bounded by surface patches. The velocity distribution within a region is assumed to be varying slowly and smoothly, whereas sharp velocity discontinuities are explicitly modeled as interfaces. Gjøystdal et al. (1985) first introduced a solid modeling technique to generate such a model. The term solid modeling refers to the fact that the internal geometrical properties of the model can be modeled as a combination of solids or volumes in 3D space. However, the algorithm defines complex regions using counter-intuitive set theoretical operations on the volumes limited by simpler surfaces. Pereyra (1996) further developed the method by using smooth surface macro-patches to represent interfaces and smooth functions to describe properties within the sub-region. The greatest advantage of Pereyra's method is that the surfaces are continuous everywhere in the curvature, whereas the main drawback is the nonlinear descriptions of surfaces, which may result in difficulties in some applications, such as ray gaps in ray tracing. Xu et al., 2006, Xu et al., 2010 also extended the work and used triangulated surfaces to represent interfaces. The use of triangulated interfaces can facilitate calculations in many occasions, e.g., the calculation in obtaining the intersection point between a ray and an interface. However, the represented interfaces by their method are discontinuous. Although the smoothness of the surface can be improved by applying some smoothing filters for the normal vectors, the represented surface is still an approximation and has errors.
Each type of model parameterization has its merits and disadvantages. An ideal velocity model can describe the velocity anomaly faithfully, and is easily applicable to general applications. The aim of the present study is to propose a novel model parameterization to describe very complex velocity models. Volumetric properties and velocity interfaces are described by different approaches. The new parameterization can properly handle complexities such as faulted interfaces, pinch-out layers or salt domes with overhangs. It belongs to the second group but still exploits the advantages of regular or irregular parameters. It can facilitate many operations. For example, it can efficiently determine the intersection point between a ray and an interface, and sufficiently describe the velocity information in the proximity of interfaces. Therefore, it can be a good candidate for general ray-based forward and inverse applications.
Section snippets
Representation of velocity model
Blocky models are normally used to describe velocity model for complicated media, as illustrated in Fig. 1. The overall model region is divided into an aggregate of irregularly shaped block elements. Seismic velocities vary smoothly within the block elements but are discontinuous across the element boundaries. In general, describing such a complicated velocity model mainly involves the following subtasks: properly representing the discontinuity interfaces, using the interfaces to partition
Applications
Ultimately, the style of model parameterization must be chosen to suit the details of particular applications. In this section, the merits of the proposed model parameterization will be illustrated in combination with three specific applications.
The first application involves the construction of a very complicated velocity model. The proposed representation method can faithfully model without simplification the complexities, such as normal and reverse faults, pinch-out layers, salt dome with
Conclusion
The discontinuous velocity model mainly includes two types of velocity information with distinct wavelength scales: large-scale information corresponding to a velocity that smoothly and slowly changes, and small-scale information corresponding to a velocity that is drastically varied. This paper uses different strategies to describe the two different scale features. The introduction of an implicit function makes the description of velocity discontinuities no longer subject to the wavelength
Acknowledgments
National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 61003110), National Key Scientific and Technological Specific Project Foundation of China (Grant 2011ZX05008-004-10), Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Software Development Environment (Grant SKLSDE-2010ZX-10), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Grant YWF-10-02-057) jointly supported this work.
References (19)
- et al.
3D-reconstruction of complex geological interfaces from irregularly distributed and noisy point data
Comput. Geosci.
(2007) - et al.
Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speedalgorithms based on Hamilton–Jacobi formulations
J. Comput. Phys.
(1988) Seismic Ray Theory
(2001)- Claerbout, J., 1999. Geophysical Estimation by Example: Environmental Soundings Image Enhancement: Stanford Exploration...
- et al.
Computer representation of complex 3-D geological structures using a new solid modeling technique
Geophys. Prospect.
(1985) - et al.
3-D seismic reflection tomography on top of the gocad depth modeler
Geophysics
(1996) - et al.
Algorithm of complex conforming Delaunay triangulation
Sci. China Inf. Sci.
(2010) - et al.
Multi-level partition of unity implicits
ACM Trans. Graph.
(2003) - et al.
Level Set Methods and Dynamic Implicit Surfaces
(2003)
Cited by (1)
Geophysical inversion for 3D contact surface geometry
2020, Geophysics