10 QuestionsTen questions concerning future buildings beyond zero energy and carbon neutrality☆
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Buildings are responsible for approximately one-third of global primary energy consumption and one-third of total direct and indirect energy-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions [1]. The ambitious goal of reducing building GHG emissions by 75% by 2050 [2] remains challenging because fragmented solutions that emphasize only a single driving factor, such as innovative energy systems [3], control of climate tipping points [4], or water resource engineering [5], may fall short of the desired outcomes that minimize environmental impacts while achieving healthy, adaptive, resilient, and productive buildings.
Buildings are a challenge and an opportunity for environmental sustainability. On one hand, population and economic growth and urbanization [6], with the increasing demand for energy, land, water, and other resources, are causing major economic and environmental transformations. Buildings are a reflection of this growth and are where humans spend over 90% of their time [7], directly contributing to many energy and environmental issues. Buildings use significant volumes of water for direct consumption and power generation and affect long-term water availability by contributing to storm water runoff and climate change [8]. The GHG emissions, landfill waste, and pollution (SO2, airborne particulates) produced from building construction and operation are directly related to health threats [9]. On the other hand, urban living promotes energy efficiency from dense buildings and reduced land use [10], with the addition that a well-designed, positive indoor environment can significantly increase occupant satisfaction, health, and productivity [11].
Aggregate building development at the district and city scales and beyond has profound effects on environmental and human health and well-being. One critical outcome of urban building development since World War II has been sprawl—characterized by unplanned and uneven patterns of growth, driven by processes such as the advent of personal vehicles, market demands, and public infrastructure investments, and leading to inefficient resource use [12].
What should be the long-term vision for our total built environment? Past visions for buildings that draft solutions based on a clean slate (such as Bruno Taut's Utopian City in 1919 [13], Le Corbusier's Radiant City in 1924 [14], Frank Lloyd Wright's Broadacre City in 1932 [15], and Paolo Soleri's Arcosanti in 1970 [16]) proved difficult to realize. Current benchmark frameworks for sustainable buildings are focused on driving near-term market transformation or describing specific sets of goals for exemplary performance [17], [18], [19]. An integrated vision that is concerned with the long-term evolution of the U.S. building stock is needed that moves the full breadth of buildings from exemplary to “typical” performers. Furthermore, this vision acknowledges that the individual buildings of the future will connect to community systems and resources such as transportation, utility infrastructure, and land use. Emerging 21st Century challenges, such as vulnerability to a changing climate and the need for a more resilient built environment, are historical opportunities to develop a forward-looking vision of future buildings.
According to the International Energy Agency [1], more than half of the current global building stock will still be standing in 2050; in OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries (where buildings are more frequently refurbished than replaced), perhaps three-quarters of existing buildings will still be in use. Assuming an 80-year average life of buildings in the U.S. [20], Fig. 1 shows one scenario of the U.S. building stock turnover in the next 100 years. (Note that the median expected lifetime for nonresidential buildings in the U.S. ranges from 50 to 65 years, depending on the use type.) Building evolution is a relatively slow but continuous process. A third to a half of the building stock is always over 40 years old and needs major renovations. Retrofitting the existing stock of buildings is an ongoing effort, which applies not only to existing buildings, but also to those in the future — i.e., buildings that are being built and will be built in the next decades.
With sustainable development calling for even longer building service life, the challenge is to keep up with the fast-changing technologies and consumer preferences in the future. This requires innovative ways to rethink how buildings can be designed and constructed. Acknowledging the gradual but dynamic building stock turnover process that will occur over the next century, we envision common building characteristics that will apply to retrofits of existing buildings as well as to new construction. A vision described for buildings 100 years from today may take 100 years to realize.
We conducted a year-long research effort through panel discussions and structured workshops that involved collaboration among hundreds of thought leaders in various fields related to building development. The topics included resilience, biomimicry and biophilia, smart cities and urban informatics, building-grid integration, building codes and regulations, public health, occupant behavior, enabling technologies and building controls, information technologies and Internet of Things, building envelope technologies and additive manufacturing, real estate market dynamics, and security [21]. A special issue of the ASME Journal of Solar Energy Engineering includes a number of articles that address some of these aspects in more detail [22].
Acknowledging the unpredictability of the future, we consider the common context under all future scenarios to include changing demography, demand for affordable housing and livable environments, and continuing pursuit of health and wellbeing. Aging population, due to rising life expectancy and declining birth rates [23], [24], poses more challenges to building development, which needs to accommodate the physical and social needs of the growing senior population. Buildings in urban areas will remain the focus of discussion as population growth and urbanization continue throughout the century [23], [25], [26]. The pursuit of built environments that support health and wellbeing is considered as the major driver of building and city developments. During our panel discussions, we asked participants what the most important attributes of future buildings would be. Increasing health, productivity, and wellbeing was rated as the most important building characteristic among the nearly 600 respondents, regardless of their background.
Based on the above projections, we explored a new framework to guide the evolutionary design process of the U.S. building stock. The framework includes desired characteristics of future buildings that are derived from multidisciplinary perspectives (i.e., environmental science, climatology, transportation, urban planning, public health, building and urban science). We use energy and GHG emissions as the common thread to examine interrelated aspects of the built environment and investigate the potential implications of supporting design paradigms, strategies, and technologies that could change the built environment. After developing descriptive building characteristics, we developed corresponding quantitative metrics, as well as average nationwide 100-year targets. Through the following 10 questions, we discuss 14 metrics for measuring future building performance. Many of these metrics use GHG emissions as a common measurement to cross-compare various aspects of buildings. These proposed metrics and associated 100-year targets directly tie building functions, occupants, and economics to buildings' environmental impact.
Section snippets
A 100-year vision: key characteristics of future buildings
The framework consists of a systematic list of future building characteristics in five categories (Fig. 2). These characteristics link a number of key measures of building performance, such as energy and water use, GHG emissions, waste, material consumption, environmental resiliency, and occupant health and productivity. The characteristics also incorporate many actors and infrastructure systems (e.g., utility infrastructure, building controls and communications, real estate market dynamics,
Ten questions concerning key metrics and targets for future buildings
For each category of building characteristic, we identified two or three quantitative performance metrics associated with long-term targets (Table 1). It would be difficult to promote fundamental changes in the current building practice without defining targets for what we propose to achieve. The metrics are intended to take the first step towards transferring the vision into actions. With technological advances, there is no doubt that there would be various means to achieve the targets. As we
Summary and conclusions
Our vision looks beyond the current century and sees buildings as active components of larger districts, adapting to changing environmental conditions and demography, supporting occupant health and well-being, and using resources efficiently to provide ubiquitous building services. We anticipate that climate change, population growth, and resource scarcity will be important design drivers, and that economic, social, health, and productivity factors, equipment and information technologies, and
Acknowledgement
This project was funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Building Technologies Office. This research project has benefitted from the input of many individuals from various organizations. Special thanks go to all of the organizations and individuals who have actively participated in our discussions, shared their ideas, and provided constructive suggestions (http://futurebuildings.labworks.org/people-and-partners.html).
References (83)
Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010
Lancet
(2012)- et al.
Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: a literature review
Energy Build.
(2010) Transition to Sustainable Buildings: Strategies and Opportunities to 2050
(2013)Transition to Sustainable Buildings: Strategies and Opportunities to 2050
(2013)- et al.
Decentralized energy systems for clean electricity access
Nat. Clim. Chang.
(2015) Early warning of climate tipping points
Nat. Clim. Chang.
(2011)Sustainable water management under future uncertainty with eco-engineering decision scaling
Nat. Clim. Chang.
(2016)World Urbanization Prospects
(2014)- et al.
Everyday life in twelve countries
Water Facts: Climate Change, Water, and Risk: Current Water Demands Are Not Sustainable
(2010)
The New Sustainable Frontier: Principles of Sustainable Development
Environmental standards and labor productivity: understanding the mechanisms that sustain sustainability
J. Organ. Behav.
Urban sprawl measurement from remote sensing data
Appl. Geogr.
The City Crown
Towards a New Architecture
The Disappearing City
Cosanti Foundation
U.S. Green Building Council. LEED
International Living Future Institute. Living Buildings Challenge
Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure
Assumptions to the Annual Energy Outlook 2016, Chapter 5, Table 5.2
Population Totals, National Totals: Vintage 2014
An Aging Nation: the Older Population in the United States
Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division
Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division
Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature
Green Infrastructure: a Landscape Approach
Biophilia
Quantification and mitigation of long-term impacts of urbanization and climate change in the tropical coastal city of San Juan, Puerto Rico
Int. J. Low-Carbon Tech.
Envisioning Florida's Future: Transportation and Land Use in an Automated Vehicle World
Are Humans Good Sensors? Using Occupant as Sensors for Indoor Environmental Quality and Thresholds that Matter
The Intuitive Control of Smart Home and Office Environments
A safe operating space for humanity
Nature
Measurement of diversity
Nature
The Mathematical Theory of Communication
Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences
Ecology
Comparison of Tree Condition and Value for City Parks and Stephen F. Austin State University in Nacogdoches, Texas, U.S
Cited by (74)
Experimental investigation of thermal and mechanical characteristics of slag cement mortars with PCM for radiant floors
2024, Case Studies in Construction MaterialsEmission-side drivers affecting carbon neutrality based on vegetation carbon sequestration: Evidence from China
2024, Chinese Journal of Population Resources and EnvironmentA dynamic intelligent building retrofit decision-making model in response to climate change
2023, Energy and BuildingsA review on zero energy buildings – Pros and cons
2023, Energy and Built Environment
- ☆
A video (http://futurebuildings.labworks.org/videos/vision-for-future-buildings.mp4?v=2) about the future buildings vision can be found at futurebuildings.pnnl.gov.