ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Volume 43, Issue 12, December 2005, Pages 1543-1558
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (210 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.brat.2004.11.007    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

How effective are cognitive and behavioral treatments for obsessive–compulsive disorder? A clinical significance analysis

Peter L. FisherCorresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Adrian Wells

Department of Clinical Psychology, Rawnsley Building, Manchester Royal Infirmary, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK

Received 22 June 2004; 
revised 15 November 2004; 
accepted 19 November 2004. 
Available online 1 April 2005.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Controlled outcome studies investigating the efficacy of psychological treatments for obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) have employed different methods of determining the clinical significance of treatment effects. This makes it difficult to draw conclusions regarding the absolute and relative efficacy of psychological treatments for OCD. To address this issue, standardized Jacobson methodology for defining clinically significant change was applied to recent psychological outcome trials for OCD. The proportion of asymptomatic patients following treatment was also calculated. When recovery is defined by Jacobson methodology, exposure and response prevention (ERP) appears the most effective treatment currently available (50–60% recovered). However, when the asymptomatic criterion is used as the index of outcome, ERP and cognitive therapy have low and equivalent recovery rates (approximately 25%).

Keywords: Obsessive–compulsive disorder; Clinical significance; Efficacy

Article Outline

Introduction
Clinical significance findings of the outcome studies
Validity of the Y-BOCS as an index of outcome in OCD
Method
Studies
Jacobson methodology for defining clinically significant change applied to the Y-BOCS
Asymptomatic criterion
Overview of data analysis
Results
Recovery rates by outcome study
Asymptomatic status
Recovery rates across treatment approaches
Discussion
References

Behaviour Research and Therapy
Volume 43, Issue 12, December 2005, Pages 1543-1558
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.