Correspondence and Communications

Dermoscopy – time for plastic surgeons to embrace a new diagnostic tool?☆

Dermoscopy is a noninvasive tool that improves the diagnostic accuracy of melanoma and other cutaneous malignancies; yet, it is not widely used by plastic surgeons, who commonly manage skin lesions. Thus, the purpose of this study was to explore current practice patterns and knowledge of dermoscopy among plastic surgeons and postgraduate plastic surgery trainees. Additionally, interest to establish a formal dermoscopy curriculum as part of plastic surgery residency training was evaluated.

An online electronic questionnaire was developed and distributed through email to practicing plastic surgeons and plastic surgery trainees at two Canadian universities.

Of the 59 potential participants, 27 (46%) responded. While the majority of participants were familiar with dermoscopy (n = 26; 96%), only one respondent reported using dermoscopy in clinical practice. However, all respondents reported exposure to melanoma clinically (n = 26; one participant did not provide a response). A lack of training, along with lack of access to dermatoscopes, were the most frequently cited reasons for not using dermoscopy. Knowledge scores with regard to dermoscopic features were also low; coupled with a noted propensity toward diagnostic or excisional biopsy, whichcould raise the benign to malignant ratio. Overall, 89% (n = 24) of respondents expressed interest in dermoscopy training in plastic surgery postgraduate training.

Few responding plastic surgeons or plastic surgery residents currently use dermoscopy in training or practice but are interested in formal dermoscopy training in residency.

Dermoscopy improves sensitivity and specificity and helps in the early detection of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSC). Because of the multidisciplinary approach to melanoma, plastic surgeons may be required to perform dermoscopy evaluation. For this reason, in some university hospitals, plastic surgeons in training might perform these evaluations. To assess the validity of digital dermoscopy conducted by plastic surgery registrars, the authors collected the diagnoses of excised lesions from a dermoscopy outpatient clinic, comparing results with literature.

A total of 1094 consecutive dermoscopy evaluations performed at Padova University Hospital between 2015 and 2018 were included in the study. All examinations were carried out by 3 plastic surgery registrars who received comparable training on dermoscopy. Excised lesions were classified according to pathological reports.

Four hundred sixty-six lesions were excised, and of them, 224 (48%) were considered pathological or atypical lesions: 34 melanomas (15%), 83 dysplastic or uncertain significance nevi (37%), and 107 NMSC and their precursors (48%). Considering only the 347 pigmented lesions, 34% were malignant or dysplastic lesions. The number needed to treat (NNT) was 10. The nevi-to-melanoma ratio (NMR) was 8, and the malignant melanoma-to-melanoma in situ ratio (MM:MMIS ratio) was 0.36.

This retrospective study tested the performance of specifically trained plastic surgery registrars in the detection of malignant skin lesions. Compared to literature, the analysis reflects a good sensibility for melanoma, especially in early curable stages. Moreover, our study underlines quite a high number of total excisions, which could be explained by the “surgical imprinting” of plastic surgery registrars.

Malignant skin cancers are common and are ever increasing annually. They can be divided into two main groups, non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC), which include basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, and malignant melanoma. This paper reviews the various surgical and non-surgical treatment modalities available for the management of skin cancers.