Reinforced bioresorbable implants for craniomaxillofacial osteosynthesis in pigs

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.07.011Get rights and content

Abstract

Our aim was to design a new bioresorbable fixation device for craniomaxillofacial surgery based on reinforcement of fibres between 2 different polymers. The final device, the 2.8 mm polyglycolide fibre-reinforced-poly-l-lactide screw (PGA FR-PLLA; PLLA/PGA: 70%:30%), was evaluated for its mechanical properties and compared with a commercial resorbable device that was not reinforced with fibre. To model clinical conditions, a unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy fixation model in pigs was then used to compare the clinical effectiveness of the resorbable screw with that of a titanium screw in vivo, followed by 3-dimensional reconstructive imaging and histological analysis. Finally, an ex vivo biomechanical test was completed to investigate the immediate fixation stability of the newly designed screws. The PGA FR-PLLA screw resulted in clinical healing that was comparable to that of the titanium screw and was mechanically superior to the commercial device, indicating that the newly-developed screws have a potential clinical application.

Introduction

Optimal healing of fractures and osteotomies in the craniomaxillofacial region generally requires the use of rigid internal fixation with titanium systems. However, there are many drawbacks to these non-degradable metallic alloys, such as interference with imaging, shielding from stress, limitations of use in children, and the presence of a foreign body with the possibility of infection.1

Bioresorbable screws are selectively used clinically to address these drawbacks. These are commonly made of the biocompatible materials poly-(d,l)-lactic acid, poly-(l)-lactic acid (PLLA), or copolymers of polylactic acid (PLA) and polyglycolic acid (PGA).2, 3 These biodegradable materials have been approved by the Federal Drug Administration in the US, and do not cause appreciable inflammatory or toxic reactions in humans.4 However, the main consideration for bioresorbable products is in sustaining appropriate rigidity throughout the healing process, as degradation begins at the time of implantation, which leads to less mechanical stability.1, 5

Reinforcement of screws by material modification is possible through self-reinforcement, which uses oriented reinforcing elements such as fibres within the screw matrix that are made of the same material. This allows the development of devices with ultra-high mechanical strength and different degradation properties.3 The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a new fibre-reinforced, composite screw that incorporates unidirectional PGA fibres with a PLLA matrix through the injection-moulding manufacturing technique. In contrast to traditional self-reinforced screws, this new heterogeneous polymer reinforcement technique may provide new mechanical variables that are suitable for clinical use.

Section snippets

Biodegradable and titanium screws

Medical grade polymer materials, poly-glycolide and poly-l-lactide, were acquired from Purac Biomaterials® (The Netherlands). PGA Fibre-reinforced PLLA Acid Screws (PGA FR-PLLA Screw, PLLA/PGA: 70%/30%) were produced with 2.8 mm external diameter, 12 mm long, and a thread width of 0.2 mm, using an injection moulding machine (ARBURG 221 K, ARBURG®, Germany) within the Industrial Technology Research Institute GMP plant under ISO 13485 standards. Production variables included a 4-stage process with

Mechanical tests

The shear strength of the reinforced screw was significantly higher than that of the commercial, non-reinforced Inion® PLLA screw (p = 0.01). However, the bending strength was not increased by reinforcement with PGA fibres (p = 0.12). Grossly, the PGA FR-PLLA screws had a tendency to bend when they failed, rather than fracture as seen with the Inion® PLLA screws. The PGA FR-PLLA screws had significantly greater torsional stiffness than the Inion® PLLA screws (p < 0.001). During the pull-out test the

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a new composite bioresorbable screw made of PGA fibre-reinforced PLLA by injection moulding for craniomaxillofacial fractures. In comparison, the current standard of reinforcement of bioresorbable screws is self-reinforcement by applying the same material in two forms, matrix and fibre. Existing commercial devices are not suitable for all clinical conditions and cost is an issue, so research to develop new devices using new

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant provided by the Industrial Technology Research Institute in Taiwan, a non-profit research and development organisation. The organisation did not contribute to the original work in this article in any way.

References (18)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (5)

  • Analytical methods in resorbable polymer development and degradation tracking

    2019, Materials for Biomedical Engineering: Absorbable Polymers
  • Recent advances in the management of oral and maxillofacial trauma

    2015, British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    There was no difference between the groups in the distance the fracture was displaced under loading, and maximal breakage forces were similar, which suggested that the fracture pattern should not affect the operative technique. Chen et al compared the use of resorbable poly-L-lactide screws (reinforced with polyglycolic acid fibres) with titanium and non-reinforced resorbable screws to fix sagittal split fractures in pigs.23 Shear and torsional strength were greater in the reinforced poly-L-lactide screws than the non-reinforced screws, and there was no difference in breakage force for each screw.

View full text