doi:10.1016/j.bios.2008.05.010
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Development of a biosensor microarray towards food screening, using imaging surface plasmon resonance
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must
purchase this article.
Sabina Rebe Raza, b,
,
, Maria G.E.G. Bremera, 1, Marcel Giesbersc and Willem Nordeb, d
aRIKILT – Institute of Food Safety, Wageningen UR, P.O. Box 230, 6700 AE Wageningen, The Netherlands
bLaboratory of Physical Chemistry and Colloid Science, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 8038, 6700 EK Wageningen, The Netherlands
cLaboratory of Organic Chemistry, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 8026, 6700 EG Wageningen, The Netherlands
dUniversity Medical Center Groningen, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands
Received 12 February 2008;
revised 8 May 2008;
accepted 28 May 2008.
Available online 3 June 2008.
Abstract
In this study we examined the possibilities of implementing direct and competitive immunoassay formats for small and large molecule detection on a microarray, using IBIS imaging surface plasmon resonance (iSPR) system. First, IBIS iSPR optics performance was evaluated. Using a glycerol calibration curve on underivatized surface we observed high baseline variability, but uniform and robust sensitivity between hundred regions of interest. Further on, a direct immunoassay for bovine IgG detection and a competitive immunoassay for gentamicin and neomycin were developed. The direct immunoassay for bovine IgG detection in a microarray format showed poor sensitivity in comparison to the assay performed in Biacore 3000, due to low immobilization efficiency on spots. The competitive immunoassay for parallel gentamicin and neomycin detection in a microarray format displayed sensitivity in the ng mL−1 range, comparable with the sensitivity achieved in Biacore 3000 and in the range of maximum residue limits in milk, established in the European Union. We expect that, utilization of the IBIS iSPR system for food analysis, by screening high and low molecular weight compounds, will allow rapid and simultaneous detection of various ingredients and contaminants, providing the end-user with a detailed food profile. However, assay transfer from conventional SPR biosensors to the imaging microarray platform also presents new challenges, such as sufficient immobilization on spots, that must be addressed in future studies.
Keywords: Imaging surface plasmon resonance; Microarray; Biosensor; Immunoassay; Food analysis
Fig. 1. Scheme of the workflow with a microarray biosensor based on imaging SPR system. CMD sensor chip is spotted with different ligands using contact spotter. Then the sensor chip is mounted on a glass prism and assembled with the flow cell. The surface of the sensor chip is illuminated at different light angles and images of the surface are taken by a CCD camera. For each spot the SPR angle is determined from angle versus intensity plots. The change in SPR angle (sensorgram) is monitored in real time and simultaneously on all the spots during buffer, sample and regeneration solution injections.
Fig. 2. SPR images of sensor chips with immobilized anti-bIgG antibody. CMD sensor chip spotted in Microgrid II with 1 mg mL−1 anti-bIgG (a). CM5 sensor chip with different immobilization levels (FC1: 0 RU, FC2: 8892 RU, FC3: 2078 RU and FC4: 543 RU) of anti-bIgG, coated in Biacore 3000 at 0.025 mg mL−1 concentration (b).
Fig. 3. Direct immunoassay for bIgG detection performed in a microarray format using IBIS iSPR and in conventional four FCs format using Biacore 3000. CMD sensor chip was spotted with 1 mg mL−1 anti-bIgG and bIgG calibration curve was measured in duplicate on each spot using IBIS iSPR (black). CM5 sensor chip was coated with different levels of anti-bIgG, and bIgG calibration curve was measured in duplicate using Biacore 3000 (white, FC2: round, FC3: triangle, FC4: square series).
Fig. 4. Sensorgrams recorded during competition immunoassay for gentamicin and neomycin, in a microarray format, using IBIS iSPR. CMD sensor chip was spotted with 3 mg mL−1 gentamicin and neomycin on different spots. Gentamicin and neomycin at several concentrations were mixed in solution with anti-gentamicin and anti-neomycin antibodies and introduced to the sensor chip in triplicate. Sensorgrams measured simultaneously on gentamicin (dark grey), neomycin (black) spots and a reference spot (light grey) during triplicate injections of 1, 5 and 10 ng mL−1 of antibiotics.
Fig. 5. Competition immunoassay for gentamicin and neomycin detection performed in a microarray format using IBIS iSPR. Gentamicin and neomycin at several concentrations were mixed in solution with anti-gentamicin and anti-neomycin antibodies and introduced to the CMD sensor chip spotted with gentamicin and neomycin. Inhibition curves for gentamicin (white) and neomycin (black) were constructed from binding percentage for each antibiotics concentration and IC50 values were calculated.
 | (3615 K)
|
Table 1.
Summary of the IBIS iSPR optics performance

Δ: Change; n: refractive index of solution; variation = (standard deviation/average response) × 100; LOD: baseline noise plus three standard deviations.
* Based on 1 mdeg = 10.8 pg mm
−2.

Corresponding author at: RIKILT – Institute of Food Safety, Wageningen UR, P.O. Box 230, 6700 AE Wageningen, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 317 480256.
1 Tel.: +31 317 480233.