ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
Volume 20, Issue 2, 15 September 2004, Pages 260-268
Special Issue in Honour of Professor Pierre Coulet
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (149 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.bios.2004.01.010    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Electrochemical modulation of antigen–antibody binding

J. Justin GoodingCorresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, a, Christine Wasiowycha, Donald Barnetta, D. Brynn Hibberta, Joseph N. Bariscib and Gordon G. Wallaceb

a School of Chemical Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia b Intelligent Polymer Research Institute, University of Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia

Received 21 June 2003; 
Revised 15 January 2004; 
accepted 22 January 2004. 
Available online 25 February 2004.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

The label-free amperometric detection of a rabbit IgG antigen by an anti-rabbit IgG antibody is achieved by observing the electrochemistry at a glassy carbon electrode modified with antibody entrapped in an electrodeposited polypyrrole membrane. In a flow injection apparatus the electrode is pulsed between −0.2 and +0.4 V versus Ag/AgCl. The pulsing of the electrode switches the polypyrrole membrane between the oxidised and reduced states. When antigen is injected into the flow stream a change in current is observed at the electrode despite the antigen or antibody being redox inactive at the potentials employed. It is proposed that this current is due to a change in the flux of ions into and out of the polypyrrole matrix during a pulse when the poly-anionic antigen is present. The immunoreaction was reversible because the 200 ms pulse at each potential was too short to allow secondary bonding forces (hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic forces) which are responsible for the strength of the antibody–antigen complex to be established. The consequence of the reversibility of the antigen–antibody binding is a low apparent affinity constant but an easily regenerated recognition interface.

Author Keywords: Antigen; Polypyrrole; Anti-rabbit IgG; Label free immunosensor; Electrochemical biosensor

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Experimental
2.1. Reagents
2.2. Apparatus
2.3. Electrode fabrication
2.4. Flow injection analysis
3. Results
3.1. Optimisation of the PED immunosensor response
3.2. Control experiments: response to other proteins, self-assembled monolayer electrodes and polytyramine–antibody electrodes
3.3. Response to different antigen concentrations in flow injection analysis
4. Discussion
5. Conclusion
References









Biosensors and Bioelectronics
Volume 20, Issue 2, 15 September 2004, Pages 260-268
Special Issue in Honour of Professor Pierre Coulet
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.