Elsevier

Bioresource Technology

Volume 258, June 2018, Pages 376-389
Bioresource Technology

Review
Effects of wastewater constituents and operational conditions on the composition and dynamics of anodic microbial communities in bioelectrochemical systems

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.090Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Anodic microbial communities and the roles of different microbes were examined.

  • Syntrophic interaction between fermenting bacteria and exoelectrogens is crucial.

  • Wastewater components may lead to enrichment of species competing for current.

  • Such species include methanogens and sulphate- and nitrate-reducing bacteria.

Abstract

Over the last decade, there has been an ever-growing interest in bioelectrochemical systems (BES) as a sustainable technology enabling simultaneous wastewater treatment and biological production of, e.g. electricity, hydrogen, and further commodities. A key component of any BES degrading organic matter is the anode where electric current is biologically generated from the oxidation of organic compounds. The performance of BES depends on the interactions of the anodic microbial communities. To optimize the operational parameters and process design of BES a better comprehension of the microbial community dynamics and interactions at the anode is required. This paper reviews the abundance of different microorganisms in anodic biofilms and discusses their roles and possible side reactions with respect to their implications on the performance of BES utilizing wastewaters. The most important operational parameters affecting anodic microbial communities grown with wastewaters are highlighted and guidelines for controlling the composition of microbial communities are given.

Introduction

Bioelectrochemical systems (BES) are devices that enable a transfer of electrons to or from a biocatalyst via a working electrode. In case this electrode is operated as anode (i.e. accepting electrons) it can sustain the biological oxidation of organic or inorganic substrates under anoxic condition. Such a biobased current flow is for instance used in microbial fuel cells (MFC) for the generation of electrical energy from the chemical energy in biomass. For electricity generation in a MFC usually oxygen is reduced at the corresponding cathode. In microbial electrolysis cells (MEC) or microbial electrosynthesis cells (MES), the reductive current is used to produce hydrogen or other compounds, such as acetate, at the cathode with the help of an additional voltage. For further information, see for instance the reviews by Hamelers et al., 2010, Logan and Rabaey, 2012.

At the anodes of BES the organic carbon content of various wastewaters, including domestic, distillery and dairy wastewaters, can be oxidized biologically (Ha et al., 2012, Montpart et al., 2015, Yu et al., 2012). If the wastewaters contain complex organics, such as cellulose, hemicellulose, fats, proteins, sugars, alcohols, or volatile fatty acids (VFAs), the biological degradation often requires syntrophic interaction of mixed species microbial communities or in other words, the capabilities of an interacting microbiome. In nature, the first degradation step is often the hydrolysis of a biopolymer. Thereafter, fermentative bacteria metabolize the monomeric sugar compounds, fatty acids, and amino acids into alcohols, VFAs, H2, and CO2 (Fig. 1). Current producing bacteria, called exoelectrogens, can oxidize different sugars, alcohols, and VFAs through anaerobic respiration using the anode of the BES as terminal electron acceptor. The wastewaters can, however, also contain inorganic compounds, such as sulfate or nitrate, which serve as electron acceptors instead of the anode and thus, result in competing metabolic reactions that direct electrons away from current production (Fig. 1).

By optimizing process design and environmental parameters (such as anode potential, pH and presence of O2, see Section 3), it is possible to direct the growth of microorganisms and improve the performance of BES. However, to be able to select for the right microbial species and to control the oxidation of organic compounds, it is important to understand the microbial community dynamics and interactions at the anode. Different microbial communities at the anode (Logan and Regan, 2006) as well as syntrophic interactions of bacteria utilizing different substrates for electricity generation (Kiely et al., 2011b) have been reviewed earlier. However, the number of publications on microbial community compositions in BES anodes has increased significantly in the past years. Furthermore, the wastewaters used as substrate at the anode may contain inorganic compounds, which may result in competing metabolic reactions (such as nitrate- or sulfate-reduction, see Section 2.1). These metabolic reactions that compete with electricity generation need to be taken into account when designing a bioelectrochemical system, but have not been considered in previous review articles.

The purpose of this review is to describe the roles of different microbial groups at the anodes of bioelectrochemical systems. Furthermore, the abundance of different bacterial phyla and species in the anodic microbial communities are compared and their capabilities to improve or hamper current production are discussed. Based on the literature, the effects of operational parameters on microbial communities are illustrated. In addition, some guidelines are derived regarding the selection of desired microbial communities and inhibition of microbial species hindering current production by changing environmental and technological parameters. At the end, further necessary research topics are highlighted.

Section snippets

Anodic microbial communities

The microbial communities enriched at the anode (as biofilms and/or planktonic cells) are diverse and depend on i) the composition of waste streams, i.e. presence of organic and inorganic compounds or microorganisms, ii) the type of BES being used, i.e. one- or two-chamber BES and anode electrode material (Sun et al., 2011), and iii) the operational conditions.

Currently, only a few microorganisms that are capable of directly producing electrical current from sugars or other complex organics are

Anode potential

In order for the microorganisms to grow, thermodynamics need to be favorable for the production of ATP, i.e. the potential difference of the electron acceptor and electron donor has to remain positive. The thermodynamics also influence the microbial communities. In this context, the microbial community composition can be influenced by the redox potential of the substrate, the redox potential of the electron acceptor (e.g. anode), and the potential difference between the two. Thus, reductive

Challenges and possibilities for controlling the microbial communities

To be able to control and direct the metabolic pathways of the microbes as well as to optimize the current yields it is important to understand the behavior of the exoelectrogenic communities at the anode. The exoelectrogenic communities can be controlled by changing process parameters at the anode (see Table 3). The main challenge related to anodic microbial communities is the inhibition of methanogenesis that decreases current yields and coulombic efficiencies. Methane production has been

Conclusions

Although the main possible metabolic reactions at the anodes of BES are known, the syntrophic and competing interactions among different microbial species should be further studied. This can be done, e.g., by studying different co-cultures and their responses at various operational conditions. In addition, finding novel ways to inhibit the competing metabolic pathways is required to be able to produce current from real wastewaters effectively and the operational parameters for each wastewater

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) under the program “ERWAS” (Grant No. 02WER1314).

References (150)

  • B.R. Dhar et al.

    Ohmic resistance affects microbial community and electrochemical kinetics in a multi-anode microbial electrochemical cell

    J. Power Sources

    (2016)
  • K. Dolch et al.

    Characterization of microbial current production as a function of microbe–electrode-interaction

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2014)
  • S. Freguia et al.

    Microbial fuel cells operating on mixed fatty acids

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2010)
  • B. Halan et al.

    Biofilms as living catalysts in continuous chemical syntheses

    Trends Biotechnol.

    (2012)
  • E.S. Heidrich et al.

    Quantification of effective exoelectrogens by most probable number (MPN) in a microbial fuel cell

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2016)
  • Z.-H. Hu et al.

    Anaerobic degradation of cellulose by rumen microorganisms at various pH values

    Biochem. Eng. J.

    (2004)
  • J. Jia et al.

    Electricity generation from food wastes and microbial community structure in microbial fuel cells

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2013)
  • K.P. Katuri et al.

    Microbial analysis of anodic biofilm in a microbial fuel cell using slaughterhouse wastewater

    Bioelectrochemistry

    (2012)
  • S.F. Ketep et al.

    Lowering the applied potential during successive scratching/re-inoculation improves the performance of microbial anodes for microbial fuel cells

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2013)
  • P.D. Kiely et al.

    Long-term cathode performance and the microbial communities that develop in microbial fuel cells fed different fermentation endproducts

    Special Issue Biofuels - II: Algal Biofuels Microbial Fuel Cells

    (2011)
  • P.D. Kiely et al.

    The electric picnic: synergistic requirements for exoelectrogenic microbial communities

    Energy Biotechnol. – Environ. Biotechnol.

    (2011)
  • H.J. Kim et al.

    A mediator-less microbial fuel cell using a metal reducing bacterium, Shewanella putrefaciens

    Enzyme Microbial Technol.

    (2002)
  • E. Kipf et al.

    Systematic screening of carbon-based anode materials for microbial fuel cells with Shewanella oneidensis MR-1

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2013)
  • R. Kumar et al.

    Exoelectrogens: Recent advances in molecular drivers involved in extracellular electron transfer and strategies used to improve it for microbial fuel cell applications

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2016)
  • E. Lalaurette et al.

    Hydrogen production from cellulose in a two-stage process combining fermentation and electrohydrogenesis

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2009)
  • J. Lee et al.

    Use of acetate for enrichment of electrochemically active microorganisms and their 16S rDNA analyses

    FEMS Microbiol. Lett.

    (2003)
  • X.M. Li et al.

    Bioelectricity production from acidic food waste leachate using microbial fuel cells: Effect of microbial inocula

    Process Biochem.

    (2013)
  • L. Liu et al.

    Double-chamber microbial fuel cells started up under room and low temperatures

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2013)
  • Z. Liu et al.

    Performance and microbial community of carbon nanotube fixed-bed microbial fuel cell continuously fed with hydrothermal liquefied cornstalk biomass

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2015)
  • B.E. Logan et al.

    Electricity-producing bacterial communities in microbial fuel cells

    Trends Microbiol.

    (2006)
  • D.R. Lovley

    The microbe electric: conversion of organic matter to electricity

    Chem. Biotechnol. Pharmaceutical Biotechnol.

    (2008)
  • L. Lu et al.

    Pyrosequencing reveals highly diverse microbial communities in microbial electrolysis cells involved in enhanced H2 production from waste activated sludge

    Water Res.

    (2012)
  • L. Lu et al.

    Syntrophic interactions drive the hydrogen production from glucose at low temperature in microbial electrolysis cells

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2012)
  • J. Madjarov et al.

    Revisiting methods to characterize bioelectrochemical systems: the influence of uncompensated resistance (iRu drop), double layer capacitance, and junction potential

    J. Power Sources

    (2017)
  • X. Mei et al.

    Adaptation of microbial community of the anode biofilm in microbial fuel cells to temperature

    Bioelectrochemistry

    (2017)
  • M. Miyahara et al.

    Use of cassette-electrode microbial fuel cell for wastewater treatment

    J. Biosci. Bioeng.

    (2013)
  • N. Montpart et al.

    Hydrogen production in single chamber microbial electrolysis cells with different complex substrates

    Water Res.

    (2015)
  • T.C. Pannell et al.

    Effect of fed-batch vs. continuous mode of operation on microbial fuel cell performance treating biorefinery wastewater

    Biochem. Eng. J.

    (2016)
  • P. Parameswaran et al.

    Hydrogen consumption in microbial electrochemical systems (MXCs): the role of homo-acetogenic bacteria

    Special Issue Biofuels - II Algal Biofuels Microbial Fuel Cells

    (2011)
  • S.A. Patil et al.

    Electricity generation using chocolate industry wastewater and its treatment in activated sludge based microbial fuel cell and analysis of developed microbial community in the anode chamber

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2009)
  • X.c. Quan et al.

    Comparative investigation on microbial community and electricity generation in aerobic and anaerobic enriched MFCs

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2013)
  • X.-C. Quan et al.

    Effect of anode aeration on the performance and microbial community of an air–cathode microbial fuel cell

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2012)
  • P. Aelterman et al.

    Continuous Electricity Generation at High Voltages and Currents Using Stacked Microbial Fuel Cells

    ES&T

    (2006)
  • I. Angelidaki et al.

    Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays

    Water Sci. Technol. J. Int. Asso. Water Pollut. Res.

    (2009)
  • J.P. Badalamenti et al.

    Coupling dark metabolism to electricity generation using photosynthetic cocultures

    Biotechnol. Bioeng.

    (2014)
  • N. Beecroft et al.

    Dynamic changes in the microbial community composition in microbial fuel cells fed with sucrose

    Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.

    (2012)
  • D.R. Bond et al.

    Electrode-Reducing Microorganisms That Harvest Energy from Marine Sediments

    Science

    (2002)
  • D.R. Bond et al.

    Evidence for Involvement of an Electron Shuttle in Electricity Generation by Geothrix fermentans

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (2004)
  • A.P. Borole et al.

    Controlling accumulation of fermentation inhibitors in biorefinery recycle water using microbial fuel cells

    Biotechnology Biofuels

    (2009)
  • C. Butler et al.

    Performance and microbial ecology of air-cathode microbial fuel cells with layered electrode assemblies

    Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.

    (2010)
  • Cited by (48)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text